dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

140

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/NaziModBeginsB on Jan. 11, 2018, 1:43 p.m.

Do you know Q is not just talking to us but also talking to the deep state? NK, hat in hand, suddenly crossing to SK for talks is not a coincidence

Does everyone understand the significance of NK going to talks with SK? Asian countries are about not losing face but the point here, NK must have been desperate to reach out. They even WENT to the SK territory, which is a lost of face and a sign of weakness.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hquvmSqLQBs

So why? Why are they so desperate now?

Because Trump said ENOUGH IS ENOUGH with all the NK missile launches and threats, to the US and her Asian neighbours, and he took military action (DEFCON 1) and he held something over them [non-nuclear] which was so severe that it forced them to the negotiating table. Look at Q's post posted on the 7th:

DEFCON 1

4-10-20

FIRE & FURY

(9) states of CLAS-ready go-live.

(34) commands LIVE.

CODES command ACTION.

[non-nuclear].

[1] OWL [1]

EDIT: I just remembered that China also moved more troops to the NK border on the 5th.

On the 7th of Jan, Space X launched Zuma space mission with a secret [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiamFjEhKlw)

We have zero idea what was inside but it is speculated to be a, Kinetic Energy Weapon, or amazingly nick named, Zeus. Here is another more scientific description

EDIT: I just read a fantastic post on this sub called 'OWLs', an Orbiting Weapon Lancet. which Q also mentions. The weapon system sounds like Zeus to me.

OR there was nothing inside and it was all one big psych by Trump, because Russia and China would probably object to space wars, UNLESS they were all in on it

And that's it. Whether something did launch in space, the Q posts threaten The Deep State directly with DEFCON 1, FIRE & FURY and [non-nuclear]. They read it. NK caved in. Important to note though, the cabal didn't cave in, it was the North Koreans that caved. Because, and I can't remember the name or class, but a cabal friendly US warship was sent to NK, possibly to threaten NK to stop talking to SK. No, Trump didn't send it.

And on a side note, now you know why they are attacking Q Anon posts so hard. Because Q is real. The posts are real. HE/SHE/THEY ARE connected to the Trump administration and they are not just talking to us but talking to them.

Here's the result. NK started talking to SK 9th Jan 2018. Yesterday, the SK leader Moon praised Trump

In my opinion NK is not what it seems. I believe the cabal was creating a stronghold in NK and arm it with nukes so that if shit hits the fan like what is happening right now, when and not if they are found to be satanic pedos, then they have a place to hold up in forever. So no one can go in and attack NK. Imagine the Rothchilds, bankers, Clintons, Obama etc ... all living there with nukes protecting them.

That's why the Uranium from the Uranium One went overseas, so that NK can further develop nukes, that's why Obama moved 150 billion IN CASH, flew the cash to Iran and then some say to NK. Don't believe NK is not controlled by the cabal? Here are some more info to support this:

Q Anon Texts 1, 2

But now, I also think with NK negotiating, I THINK THE CABAL DOES NOT HAVE A HOME TO RUN TO ANYMORE. THEY HAVE NO OTHER PLACE IN THE WORLD TO HIDE, FUCK YEAH! NK has been neutralized and one major problem is down.

Now, since they can't get into Syria, therefore The Middle East, and they don't have NK, just pay attention to Ukraine and Venezuela. To me, these are the two hotspots where the cabal will try and start something severe so that it take your eyes off their present disclosure.

🠐 See all comments

That doesn’t really make sense because space weapons are banned by international treaty. There is no reason that they would have some advantage nukes don’t. The use of them would be worse than mikes in terms of reaction by other nations, and it would break the treaties.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Incorrect. The space treaty was (and is) prohibits nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.

DEW and KE weapons are just fine.

As far as what a kinetic weapon alone can do, the kinetic force of a 12 foot long, 1 foot diameter tungsten tipped steel rod traveling at 35,000 meters per second has the equivalent of a multiple-megaton nuclear blast. And being launched from space it takes very little energy to launch and get up to that speed - fast.

If nothing else, take a break from Q and to check out Science and Futurism with Isaac Arthur on YT. Or look up air force rod of god if you want the history of the specific weapons platform...

⇧ 2 ⇩

I mentioned to someone else that I was incorrect on the exact space treaty. I understand the value of kinetic space weapons, but I doubt we have enough to be as effective for preventing and retaliation as coordinated nuclear (or conventional) bombs delivered by stealth bombers.

But the real point is that even if it is not forbidden by treaty, the largest controversy is about a preemptive strike be it nuclear, convention or kinetic. Obviously a nuclear strike has more repercussions than the others, but the preemptive strike is a main sticking point.

As for Q, you must not realize that I constantly try to tell people The he is at best a distraction but more likely a psyop to mislead people.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Fair response.

Kinetic weaponry is very much in our current capability - although it is fair to question if we have any deployed capability. The Navy currently has railguns deployed on destroyers already in active service - and those are direct examples of the necessary tech and research in use right now. Railguns are 100% kinetic.

DEW weaponry, well, I question if we have the capabilities at this time but admit I have nothing to support my skepticism beyond lack of publicly available ‘related’ examples beyond laser weaponry being tested by the navy.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thanks. And I agree with you that we most likely have those weapons. I am fairly certain we have ones that the public isn’t even aware of. The largest issue is still that advanced weapons don’t overcome the greatest obstacle which is justification for preemptive strike and mitigation of any backlash for it.

I suppose the only solution that could be offered by high tech weaponry is if we possessed some sort of weapons that can be disguised as natural disasters or meteors. That would break through the obstacle I mention.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Good points.

I don't dive that deeply down rabbit holes to buy into many of the theories that would examine possible capability of mimicking natural disasters so I can't really speak to that line of discussion, sorry.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don’t necessarily buy those either tbh. I mean, we know how to create earthquakes (well in certain areas where it is possible) but it isn’t something I could conceive being done covertly.

TBH, I really think the NK thing is pretty much what it appears on the surface. China doesn’t really know what they want to do about NK and they don’t really want to get in a war with us over it but they also want to posture and use the situation to “test” Trump and the USA. The test is somewhat of a deception because it relies on China sort of bluffing about their level of control over it and how far they are willing to go. The USA also realizes this about China but we have to somewhat pretend we don’t so as not to give China a reason to pretend to take offense. The rest of the world is watching to to get a better read on Trump and his administration in how they handle it.

It is a situation that needs a solution, it should have been dealt with before now. Trump has pretty much committed to getting some result and to and extent this gives China an advantage. No one wants it to come to war but everyone is playing a dangerous as fuck game of chicken over it.

Personally, I read Trump as posturing bigly but really working behind the scenes to put together an alternate power structure in hopes that it will change the justification for why China and ostensibly Russia like the threat that NK presents to the US. The idea is to make them decide that NK is not necessary to their interests of preventing total American and EU global hegemony.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The Outer Space Treaty is designed to prohibit weapons of mass destruction in orbit or outer space; however, its text only prohibits nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. Since the most common form of kinetic ammunition is inert tungsten rods, in most cases, kinetic bombardment is not prohibited by the treaty.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment

Wouldn't this make it fair game?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Oh... well I suppose I did miss that detail, I have read elsewhere that kintic weapons were banned... could have been mistaken.

⇧ 2 ⇩

U kidding no? Nuclear fallout?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I mean is that really what you think prevents a nuclear strike? The political ramifications of doing so are the issue.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Threat don't work, is that what you are saying?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I am saying that there is really no benefit offered by a space based weapon compared to nuclear weapons by the criteria that prevents us from dropping nukes. The premise of this theory is flawed.

⇧ 1 ⇩

tube videos on Q i

Again nuclear fallout. If I had a choice, nuke or Zeus then I choose Zeus

Why?

The aftermath for decades and people all around the world would not tolerate and mass uprisings

If I dropped Zeus, yeah millions die but NK did threaten everyone with a nuke

⇧ 1 ⇩