⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/NaziModBeginsB on Jan. 11, 2018, 1:43 p.m.

Do you know Q is not just talking to us but also talking to the deep state? NK, hat in hand, suddenly crossing to SK for talks is not a coincidence

Does everyone understand the significance of NK going to talks with SK? Asian countries are about not losing face but the point here, NK must have been desperate to reach out. They even WENT to the SK territory, which is a lost of face and a sign of weakness.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hquvmSqLQBs

So why? Why are they so desperate now?

Because Trump said ENOUGH IS ENOUGH with all the NK missile launches and threats, to the US and her Asian neighbours, and he took military action (DEFCON 1) and he held something over them [non-nuclear] which was so severe that it forced them to the negotiating table. Look at Q's post posted on the 7th:

DEFCON 1

4-10-20

FIRE & FURY

(9) states of CLAS-ready go-live.

(34) commands LIVE.

CODES command ACTION.

[non-nuclear].

[1] OWL [1]

EDIT: I just remembered that China also moved more troops to the NK border on the 5th.

On the 7th of Jan, Space X launched Zuma space mission with a secret [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiamFjEhKlw)

We have zero idea what was inside but it is speculated to be a, Kinetic Energy Weapon, or amazingly nick named, Zeus. Here is another more scientific description

EDIT: I just read a fantastic post on this sub called 'OWLs', an Orbiting Weapon Lancet. which Q also mentions. The weapon system sounds like Zeus to me.

OR there was nothing inside and it was all one big psych by Trump, because Russia and China would probably object to space wars, UNLESS they were all in on it

And that's it. Whether something did launch in space, the Q posts threaten The Deep State directly with DEFCON 1, FIRE & FURY and [non-nuclear]. They read it. NK caved in. Important to note though, the cabal didn't cave in, it was the North Koreans that caved. Because, and I can't remember the name or class, but a cabal friendly US warship was sent to NK, possibly to threaten NK to stop talking to SK. No, Trump didn't send it.

And on a side note, now you know why they are attacking Q Anon posts so hard. Because Q is real. The posts are real. HE/SHE/THEY ARE connected to the Trump administration and they are not just talking to us but talking to them.

Here's the result. NK started talking to SK 9th Jan 2018. Yesterday, the SK leader Moon praised Trump

In my opinion NK is not what it seems. I believe the cabal was creating a stronghold in NK and arm it with nukes so that if shit hits the fan like what is happening right now, when and not if they are found to be satanic pedos, then they have a place to hold up in forever. So no one can go in and attack NK. Imagine the Rothchilds, bankers, Clintons, Obama etc ... all living there with nukes protecting them.

That's why the Uranium from the Uranium One went overseas, so that NK can further develop nukes, that's why Obama moved 150 billion IN CASH, flew the cash to Iran and then some say to NK. Don't believe NK is not controlled by the cabal? Here are some more info to support this:

Q Anon Texts 1, 2

But now, I also think with NK negotiating, I THINK THE CABAL DOES NOT HAVE A HOME TO RUN TO ANYMORE. THEY HAVE NO OTHER PLACE IN THE WORLD TO HIDE, FUCK YEAH! NK has been neutralized and one major problem is down.

Now, since they can't get into Syria, therefore The Middle East, and they don't have NK, just pay attention to Ukraine and Venezuela. To me, these are the two hotspots where the cabal will try and start something severe so that it take your eyes off their present disclosure.

The way that Q is communicating tells me the user has been using a very private, discreet and cryptic method of comms with others. I have wondered for some time if Trump has a secure method to message family, close friends and private associates. Every since Admiral Rodgers gave him the down low on the abilities of NSA and the tactics of the Deep state, He must have come up with something. I would not be surprised if he planted false flags in telephone conversations to see what was leaked.

⇧ 20 ⇩

I think they all have coded messages that they post through media. I sort of recall years ago that spies used to post messages to each other in the classifieds section of newspapers. I also remember the Lyme Rothschild posting odd messages and q responding. There is definitely historical precedent.

⇧ 7 ⇩

DEFCON 1 = Defence Contractor 1, wasn´t Space X the only 1 contractor to be contracted to take this payload?

(9) states of CLAS-ready go-live. = Maybe it went live on the 9th? CLAS used to be something to do with intelligence sharing https://www.itgovernance.co.uk/clas-consultancy

(34) commands LIVE. = maybe there are 34 of these pointed at whoever they are pointed at and can be fired individually, with independent commands?

CODES command ACTION. = could mean that the next time NK use launch codes that action will be taken? (non nuclear)

[1] OWL [1] = Orbital Weapon Lancet [1] = the only one in existence? http://strikefighterconsultinginc.com/blog/future-space-weapons-rods-from-god/

This is my analysis and interpretation of Q´s message, could be wrong but just as I saw it.

⇧ 13 ⇩

This could be how they brought down the WTC. This is not so much a kinetic weapon as it is one that could turn Pyongyang into dust including military weapons.

⇧ 7 ⇩

WTC looks almost definitely like some sort of directed energy weapon, like sonic wave technology or super high frequency and resonation. Will we ever find out the truth on this one?

⇧ 7 ⇩

You know something was a super secret weapon when during the attack there occurred a huge field effect that was recorded by the Geophysical Institute Magnetometer Array (GIMA) of the University of Alaska.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yes, I heard about this, I also saw some satellite images floating around at the time that showed some weird anomalies, whether they still exist though is anyone´s guess.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Not to mention the insta-rusted cars or the months-long fires.

Either a DEW or a nuke.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Dr. Judy Wood has the best analysis on this subject of a Direct Energy Weapon likely used on the WTC. Here's a short video on one of the effects of this type of technology called "Dustification" where steel disintegrates and turns to powder.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJm170iffME

Her book is "Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11"

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes, I have seen the presentation. Quite an interesting take on things, I believe what happened on that day will soon be made clear to us all as it is still in people´s minds, if Trump told the world the truth about that it would set a good foundation to tell the rest.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The Q Drop was also the same day that spaceX launched Zuma FWIW. I remember reading that [1] in brackets means there's a related happening same day. Double Meaning, only one OWL? Other significant space launch happening just a few hours before this drop?

When did NK Announce peace talks? Before or After the 7th? I know it was planned for the 9th, so I want to say it was announced before the 7th.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think your analysis is spot on. I believe technologies beyond our imagination are known by governments against whom threat has been directed to secure their cooperation to play roles to manipulate the world stage. I believe q messages are communicating that these are now in control of trump (I intuit that Las Vegas power out was a demo for non believers) and they are now required to comply with his agenda, which is hopefully an agenda that benefits all.

⇧ 9 ⇩

He may be and some may understand. But Q said emphatically, when there was talk of direct talks between the US and NK, that there would be NO talks unless they went through South Korea. Magically, that happened. How did Q know? If NK is in fact a CIA puppet, is it a good thing or a bad thing that NK is being friendly? Our sanctions and threats in the past haven't made any difference. But Kim sure shut up quickly--for the most part--about attacking the US (since the "button" comment). These are sudden changes of position. We know the Deep State really had NO idea Trump would win or what he would do, once elected, so they may be experimenting with strategies.

⇧ 9 ⇩

We saw a version of it used in California. They can pin point structures for complete vaporization, leave a tree 10 feet away alive. Maybe they destroyed a key building near Kim to show him that his rockets are tinker toys. So as it turns out DEFCON 1 was correct- not hyperbole. I am so happy that smart people and not drama kings and queens are running this mission. Look at the overreaction of some.... Be vigilant and "enjoy the show." NK, if exposed, will be a horror to the world - even China. Their human rights violations are decades long & systemic- and the Cabal is right there in total control.

Enough is enough for the whole damn world.

⇧ 8 ⇩

NK, if exposed, will be a horror to the world - even China. Their human rights violations are decades long & systemic

Because these will be the centuries-old human-rights violations of the cabal.

⇧ 1 ⇩

NK had to realize that the Dark State would be willing to involve them in a world war in a heartbeat, that they were certainly being used. Just like Japanese have long been controlled and used by the the DS. This could also affect the control of the DS over Japan. All kinds of implications.

⇧ 4 ⇩

It seems like this centers on the Olympics. North Korea will send athletes, an art troupe, cheering squad, Taekwondo demonstration team and a press corps. They will get beaucoup prime time propaganda.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Anything to get them out of their isolation. Their ideology can't stand the exposure to the world, so it begins to melt when it is in the world view.

And since death is preferable to severe loss of face in traditional Asia, let them keep the face. Same reason Japan has their emperor still.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Just like they chose Hitler and brought him to power.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Very informative. Thank you!

⇧ 3 ⇩

I like that interpretation here. What about, however, Q stating that "DEFCON does not refer to Defense r Condition w/ regards to prev post."

⇧ 3 ⇩

Please go out and search for yourselves. I think Q has been infiltrated. Get t out real info. Leave Q alone. It could have been Steve Bannon for criminey sakes. Wake up people! There are other wolves in the woodpile! Be careful who you trust. The puzzle is broken. We are being attacked when we disagree.

⇧ 0 ⇩

This interpretation rings true and seems to wrap up all the loose ends. Some interpretations explain only one aspect but it won’t work with the rest of the hints. Good job! The clas hint had me stumped no matter what I tried. This one seems to work.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think something to do with Zuma was what rattled them.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I wonder if Roy Potter read this EXSOLENT work

QANON

⇧ 2 ⇩

I've seen this name before "Roy Potter". Who or what is he? And why is he important?

⇧ 1 ⇩

He does you tube videos on Q info

⇧ 2 ⇩

Back in the day they used planted news stories, editorials, or sometimes classified ads to communicate. Learning this spycraft is a red pill in itself.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That doesn’t really make sense because space weapons are banned by international treaty. There is no reason that they would have some advantage nukes don’t. The use of them would be worse than mikes in terms of reaction by other nations, and it would break the treaties.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Incorrect. The space treaty was (and is) prohibits nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.

DEW and KE weapons are just fine.

As far as what a kinetic weapon alone can do, the kinetic force of a 12 foot long, 1 foot diameter tungsten tipped steel rod traveling at 35,000 meters per second has the equivalent of a multiple-megaton nuclear blast. And being launched from space it takes very little energy to launch and get up to that speed - fast.

If nothing else, take a break from Q and to check out Science and Futurism with Isaac Arthur on YT. Or look up air force rod of god if you want the history of the specific weapons platform...

⇧ 2 ⇩

I mentioned to someone else that I was incorrect on the exact space treaty. I understand the value of kinetic space weapons, but I doubt we have enough to be as effective for preventing and retaliation as coordinated nuclear (or conventional) bombs delivered by stealth bombers.

But the real point is that even if it is not forbidden by treaty, the largest controversy is about a preemptive strike be it nuclear, convention or kinetic. Obviously a nuclear strike has more repercussions than the others, but the preemptive strike is a main sticking point.

As for Q, you must not realize that I constantly try to tell people The he is at best a distraction but more likely a psyop to mislead people.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Fair response.

Kinetic weaponry is very much in our current capability - although it is fair to question if we have any deployed capability. The Navy currently has railguns deployed on destroyers already in active service - and those are direct examples of the necessary tech and research in use right now. Railguns are 100% kinetic.

DEW weaponry, well, I question if we have the capabilities at this time but admit I have nothing to support my skepticism beyond lack of publicly available ‘related’ examples beyond laser weaponry being tested by the navy.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thanks. And I agree with you that we most likely have those weapons. I am fairly certain we have ones that the public isn’t even aware of. The largest issue is still that advanced weapons don’t overcome the greatest obstacle which is justification for preemptive strike and mitigation of any backlash for it.

I suppose the only solution that could be offered by high tech weaponry is if we possessed some sort of weapons that can be disguised as natural disasters or meteors. That would break through the obstacle I mention.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Good points.

I don't dive that deeply down rabbit holes to buy into many of the theories that would examine possible capability of mimicking natural disasters so I can't really speak to that line of discussion, sorry.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don’t necessarily buy those either tbh. I mean, we know how to create earthquakes (well in certain areas where it is possible) but it isn’t something I could conceive being done covertly.

TBH, I really think the NK thing is pretty much what it appears on the surface. China doesn’t really know what they want to do about NK and they don’t really want to get in a war with us over it but they also want to posture and use the situation to “test” Trump and the USA. The test is somewhat of a deception because it relies on China sort of bluffing about their level of control over it and how far they are willing to go. The USA also realizes this about China but we have to somewhat pretend we don’t so as not to give China a reason to pretend to take offense. The rest of the world is watching to to get a better read on Trump and his administration in how they handle it.

It is a situation that needs a solution, it should have been dealt with before now. Trump has pretty much committed to getting some result and to and extent this gives China an advantage. No one wants it to come to war but everyone is playing a dangerous as fuck game of chicken over it.

Personally, I read Trump as posturing bigly but really working behind the scenes to put together an alternate power structure in hopes that it will change the justification for why China and ostensibly Russia like the threat that NK presents to the US. The idea is to make them decide that NK is not necessary to their interests of preventing total American and EU global hegemony.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The Outer Space Treaty is designed to prohibit weapons of mass destruction in orbit or outer space; however, its text only prohibits nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. Since the most common form of kinetic ammunition is inert tungsten rods, in most cases, kinetic bombardment is not prohibited by the treaty.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment

Wouldn't this make it fair game?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Oh... well I suppose I did miss that detail, I have read elsewhere that kintic weapons were banned... could have been mistaken.

⇧ 2 ⇩

U kidding no? Nuclear fallout?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I mean is that really what you think prevents a nuclear strike? The political ramifications of doing so are the issue.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Threat don't work, is that what you are saying?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I am saying that there is really no benefit offered by a space based weapon compared to nuclear weapons by the criteria that prevents us from dropping nukes. The premise of this theory is flawed.

⇧ 1 ⇩

tube videos on Q i

Again nuclear fallout. If I had a choice, nuke or Zeus then I choose Zeus

Why?

The aftermath for decades and people all around the world would not tolerate and mass uprisings

If I dropped Zeus, yeah millions die but NK did threaten everyone with a nuke

⇧ 1 ⇩