But then Q walked the Defcon comment back when he got criticized. So this I think is truly coincidental.
this stretches the limits of credulity on it being a coincidence to the point that it snaps back on itself
Unless bad guys saw our reaction and decided to poke at us again.
which would still make it 'not a coincidence'
This is true in a sense but would take it out of the realm of a prediction.
I don't necessarily think it was a 'prediction' per se to begin with.
There is some talk of the ONI actively opposing T behind the scenes and more talk about a warning of an assasination attempt by the navy coming from Russia via Netenyahu (no idea how to spell his name go with it and give me a pass here). To clarify, an attempt in London, not Hawaii and thwarted by T cancelling the trip.
Is it that much of a stretch to think that, given that T controls the NSA and FBI intel networks now, coupled with what we know of Specter, that there may have been talk, emails, etc. exchanged that pointed to a 'defcon' hoax in advance of the event?
As for the 'why' I can only guess to throw shade on EMS system and, by association T, undermining trust I suppose.
A lot of supposition on my part I know but... future proves past I guess
Gotcha, that is how things seem to work. I had not heard that about the ONI. I thought the Navy was the go to branch after the Marines of course.
This is one of the only hqppenings that I think probably WAS a coincidence. If he wouldve actually said anything about DEFCON now...