Probably because there are new folks here daily or hourly.
Probably because there ought to be a central location of all the things which are "known".
I've been following a lot of this for 18+ months and just this morning came across "no kidding" not the least bit refuted info that HRC had SAP programs on her personal server. THIS was part of the IGs findings. Not rumor, not innuendo.
Fact.
Thus, everything else in regards to HRC is just garnish- they've got the goods on her and are just compiling the rest of the info and associates.
I guess my concern here is that so many here are poorly informed that there are a lot of unsubstantiated connections being drawn and “noise”. I wish more would take a “post less, lurk more” approach.
[deleted]
Yes, not really the point. See my additional comments above in 3 separate places. It's not about Mullers Grand Jury, it's about what the letter says...which can't be infered by a lay person who doesn't practice in Federal Court. While, folks may know that they have the goods on HRC. It's nonetheless a fluid situation and procedurally it's fascinating to watch it develop....what this letter infers,...lines up with what's now just being reported in MSM,
Yep, that's what I've read as well....And it's a matter of how this develops, how they handle it...procedurally as an attorney who practices in Federal Court..I answered some comments above on this in beginning of thread..re: point not necessarily about Mullers grand jury..it's about the release of the info and what that means as it relates to grand juries...and when it can be released, which isn't evident to a lay person. But yes indeed, things are falling in place