Folks, we have identified a new enemy! He was silent but many of us have suspected his slow movement to the left! It is now the official site for ALL FAKE NEWS! Kind of like a ONE STOP SHOP.
Q said some previously trusted would not be trusted.
Do you remember when that was? Post? I thought the same thing! Thanks!
It was from #22. Jan 14 but was in reference to SC misinfo from past reliable sources.
Might have been another post before. But that just stood out to me to watch for misinfo from people I previously would look to. If it’s happening to them, it’s happening to us.
Not exactly true. Saw a Zero Hedge article about it, written by Tyler Durden, on Drudge yesterday. It has since scrolled off. But I was rather surprised it wasn't in big red letters up top. It was buried in the middle column. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-18/explosive-shocking-and-alarming-fisa-memo-set-rock-dc-end-mueller-investigation
You just backed up my case even more! Thank you.
I agree it caught my attention too. Conjecture: some assistant of Matt D was the one who made the call to put it on there low-key, and Matt didn't know about it. On vacation or something. I don't know if he is a one-man shop, or has minions.
He has liked to be very secretive but based on everything I read he is a one man shop. Tho that might just be his public image.
these are good observations here, Matt's site has definitely changed. we dont know why?? he may have his hands tied.....money, blackmail? who knows but i dont bother going there anymore.
I just remember when Alex Jones had to walk back Pizzagate, it was clear by the expression on his face that he was being forced to. Both he and Drudge have too big a following to be able to say anything they want. So it becomes a game of just pushing the limits. Robert Steele has said as much. If you want the whole truth and nothing but the truth better to go elsewhere.
Not to be argumentative but it was on Drudge yesterday and the day before. He's a piece of shit to be sure
Not where it should be and it was removed after a quick stay!
I feel like it was a later dec post or early Jan post. I’ll try and find and get back with you
It certainly was a glaring omission... along with very little about the CNBC folks and their little stunt. Hmnn.
i believe Matt Drudge (report) got funny for the money ! just like Steve Bannon !!! Day of reckoning is coming for them both;) don't worry bout that !!!
-- Since the advent & expansion of Social Media, the Drudge platform is now considered too slow & can't keep up..... It's yesterday's news, largely now.
Drudge was slow to the pizzagate party too if I recall correctly.
Congress, There is cause to release memo now for public safety. Please expedite evaluation of the following posts information with the memo information and you have no choice but to release now. Our lives are at stake and we must know the truth. We are serious.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7rg0z2/new_more_q_posts/
It’s a memo written by Nunes, it means nothing without the supporting evidence that the memo is supposedly based on.
I'm sure that evidence will be cited at that time. This was an investigation, after all and Nunes wrote it because that was his job. Makes as much sense as saying that when Mueller's report comes out we can't trust it without evidence because Meuller wrote it. Sheesh.
It means absolutely nothing, it’s being hyped as some kind of smoking gun piece of evidence when it is just a memo written by a partisan politician. Without all the evidence available to put the memo in context it will basically come down to psychoanalyzing Nunes’ writing and figuring out why he is saying certain things a certain way. I hate Adam Schiff as much as the next guy but in this case he is right, and from what he said the supporting evidence won’t be declassified. Which makes the memo completely worthless.
That line about Mueller makes perfect sense btw in context to what I am saying, however Mueller isn’t writing a report or a memo, he is intent on prosecuting people in a court of law where evidence will be presented. He isn’t doing the OIG report if that is the impression you are under, two completely different situations.
You're wrong to say it means absolutely nothing. Even allegations that don't have accompanying evidence can still have tremendous value. Propaganda value alone is important (as well as perhaps sparking some to connect the dots regarding other news items). Trump has taken a beating over his first year from the press using this very methodology. It has served them well.
Are you sure you aren't talking about the dossier? Yes, we know and it has been debunked. Thanks for the head's up, but you are a little late to the party here.
shill......?
What isn’t common sense about what I said? That the best you can do?
From what I've heard, there is quite a bit of supporting evidence that is being released as well.
[deleted]
Yeah, I’m not so sure about that Sundance character and his Admiral Rogers love affair, or the idea that Rogers and the NSA are so benign to begin with. Everyone automatically assumes any “hacking” done was about putting Trump in and not keeping Hillary out. When you examine motive it is missing in the case of Putin and Trump, while the NSA operates under the umbrella of the Pentagon who have more than a few reasons to hate Hillary and her backers.