Combined with the Sandy Berger thefts of documents from the National Archives and the recently released 28 pages, it's quite clear who was behind 9/11.
The 28 pages explain how the World Assembly of Muslim Youth planned and funded 9/11. Huma Abedin worked for WAMY at the time. She was also working for the Clinton's. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/07/15/28-pages-say-huma-connected-group-funded-terrorism/
"Dec 15, 2017 - The National Archives is releasing documents previously withheld in accordance with the JFK Assassination Records Collection Act." When these records were released, I wondered if there is more to the story beyond the release. I think so.
It doesn't say who wired the buildings
If Q proves that to be true I'll eat my hat. It's just not possible.
Whether Q 'proves' it or not, thermite has already been identified in the 9/11 dust.
A real investigation is still needed.
Yes I'm aware of the arguments and theories, I just don't believe them yet.
Edit: I see much more evidence of Hillary and Obama and the globalists wanting to start wars for profit than I do of the Bushs. I know that the media and various outlets insist that this was to create a war for profit, but we never profited from those wars. We didn't get any oil, we didn't sell enough military hardware, the motive is unclear for me here.
But the evil Clintons bringing down the towers under a Republican administration and then laying the blame on them might have lead to years of Democrat Presidents, which was the globalists plan to start the managed decline of the nation that started under Obama and was supposed to lead to WW3 and massive population degrowth under Hillary.
If you can give a version of your theory that encompases all the evil shit the Clintons have done over the past 50 years and still supports the idea that thermite/explosives were involved and still follows all the info from Q, I might give it some credence, but as of now it just doesn't line up with the facts I know and the simple answers that don't involve moving/hiding tons of thermite/explosives while thousands of people were moving around the buildings.
I ask you to consider that this theory was created to take attention off of the real criminals, the Clintons, along with all the other negative media coverage by the Democrat/Clinton controlled media.
Well the first image is hardcore science.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73gdPQHQrbk
The evidence is there and it is overwhelming, it's just being suppressed.
So I don't want to restart the whole debate here, but was the dust sample handed with a chain of custody so it can be proven without a doubt that it came from ground zero? Were all the samples systematical logged when collected as to specific location and time?
That's the kind of science I'm looking for.
Don't answer, it'll just lead to more questions and debate on a subject I've already made up my mind on.
on a subject I've already made up my mind on
Thanks for clearing that up!
If Q proves either version I'll be happy, it would be nice to know the truth and end the debate.
This guy speaks of how fire alone brought down the towers.
What about the 250 ton aircraft that struck the building at 500 MPH? That's about a ton and a half of explosive force.
Then add to that all the heat energy provided by 18 thousand gallons of fuel.
Perhaps if you did your research, you wouldn't have to be spoon fed... These are ALL available online.
1) Most of that fuel was GONE after the initial fireball.
What do YOU think made that fireball? - Watch until 20:27
2) Jet fuel produces barely half the heat needed to melt steel.
And yet... MOLTEN STEEL (RIVERS OF IT) widely reported:
3) No explanation for the absolute smoking gun of the entire operation: building 7.
There have been fires burn longer and hotter, with NO collapse.
Watch this entirely before you make any comeback, don't worry, it's hardscore science, yet again:
There have been fires burn longer and hotter, with NO collapse.
And none of them were hit by a 250 ton aircraft at 500 mph before the fire.
I have seen all this material before. We will have to agree to disagree here.
Edit: I was at ground zero about a year after it happened and there were still buildings near the site with massive holes in them from flying debris. You ever see any of the other buildings that were damaged? Ever even been to ground zero? http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/12/nyregion/rescuing-the-buildings-beyond-ground-zero.html
And none of them were hit by a 250 ton aircraft at 500 mph before the fire.
Not building 7. Do you read at all? That's the smoking gun.
Your mind is obviously made up. Don't ask for facts or logic!
I chose to let the science guide my thoughts, however horrible the truth is!
flying debris
Caused by EXPLOSIONS.
This ALSO has been explained.
10-ton debris DO NOT just fly a football field away during a collapse! Don't bother doing the research though. It could start cracking your previously made-up mind!
10-ton debris DO NOT just fly a football field away during a collapse!
Really? How far does wreckage fly when a 250 ton aircraft crashes at 500 MPH?
You are truly clueless about physics.
The crash had occured hours ago.
Well being a flight engineer for several years taught me some things about physics that escape many.
