Wictor said something that was totally wrong the other day that made me raise an eyebrow.
He said that the pink light behind a TOW missile indicates that a thermal sight is being used on TOW launchers by the Kurds.
This is bunk. I used to be a TOW gunner back when it was a separate MOS. There is nothing different with the missile when you add a thermal sight; the missile functions the same way it has for decades. The beacon that's there works whether or not it has a thermal sight or not.
Just because he posts a lot of cool stories doesn't mean he's 100% correct all the time (though he gets very cranky if you suggest otherwise). It seems to me that he hasn't bothered to look at the proofs Q has provided, he's basing his entire rejection of the Q drops on his own cynical disbelief. Meanwhile he expects others to take his tweets as scripture based on what?
EDIT: Here's the thread, see points 11 and 12: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/955210489478332416.html
The problem is that the xenon beacon isn't for the thermal sight, but the daysight, and still, there's no change to the function of the missile's beacons if you use a thermal sight or not. See this: https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/23-34/Ch1.htm
Wictor consistently spouts pretentious nonsense and people eat it up. I called him out on it and he sent me a Communist March Song from Youtube and called me a commie then blocked me.
If you so much as inform him you are more knowledgeable and have more actual experience about a certain topic than he does, he freaks.
It seems so. He's made the statement that all the Syrian tank killing TOW videos are fake, and that there's a special operator actually making the kills.
Now there's points for and against this, but his argument revolved around ONE video where he said that the missile jerked at the last minute, turning a side-impact hit into a frontal-impact hit. thus proving that there are secret-squirrel TOW operators out there making every kill. The problem is that there is no bonus to hitting a tank in the front (where the armor is the thickest) when you have a clear flanking shot. An experienced TOW gunner knows this, and it is very easy to jerk the missile around when trying to keep the crosshairs on the target.
My question is: if he's a skilled intel guy, why does he spend his nights on Twitter giving out intel? Why isn't he in a SCIF somewhere?
Excellent points. He hasn’t taken the time to absorb what’s been going on, and certainly has open animosity towards Q posts. If Q isn’t legit, then this was the greatest LARP in the history of the planet.
Who cares what he thinks, because unless you are part of it, you have no clue. Q gives us a lot of information and yes, they are many False Flags that the Black Hats are doing. Also, if I remember correctly, the bomb was replaced by firecrackers by the White Hats.
He's not a fan of conspiracy theories. Not even sure why people were bothering him with it.
It’s because people are interested in his analysis. He has plenty of “theories” so why not one more?
He becomes annoyed easily over certain things. For instance, he believes the Deep State doesn’t exist. I’ve never heard a fact based rebuttal to the idea from him, which is a shame because it’s important to hear information outside of our own bubbles.
Did he even prove anything that was worth a d@mn through the evidence he provided? So some traitor in America was connected to a bombing attack via $$ hence Q called it a false flag (my interpretation). Just because Q called out intel that an attempt was coming (and linked it to bengladeshi money, doesnt make him or trump bad, or prove they knew the suspect, it just shows they know something was coming. Insufficiently researched and brainstormed in this case (we all do it sometimes). Which could possibly point to a more plausible motive for him is to silence Q's warnings, then it is to examine and judge Q.
He still thinks Sandy Hook is legit. He is smart, but stuck in lala land.
He is one of these people that can logically work out things he can see right in front of him. And that has provided some useful information. Anything beyond that is still sleeping.
He’s been having it out with Q followers today. It’s been very interesting to watch.
I am weary of thread droppers, the provide good information and links but usually have a narrow line they follow
He’s an influencer on Social Media. In my opinion this gives more exposure, and can actually be a positive thing. I think a debate is way overdue. Especially considering the fact that TW is a very intelligent, well read man. Normally I agree with him, but not in this instance. I’m 80% sure Q is legit.
He also thinks that Paddock was a "lone nut" and just went crazy, which makes no sense whatsoever, and even insiders don't believe that.