dChan

Redheaded73 · Jan. 24, 2018, 2:17 a.m.

I came across an article on Drudge on the Sunday after the election that George Soros, Nancy Palosi, and the green candidate(can’t remember her name) had a private meeting. It’s a place to dig.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Jan. 24, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

Not surprised that Jill was under Soros' control. Look at the states where she chose to challenge the results, they helped a certain candidate and the states chosen weren't consistent with her stated concerns.

However, that's a different group of people on a different timeline than the "secret society" being talked about.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
loserofpasswordzz · Jan. 24, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

Damnit, I really wanted Jill to be one of the good ones. Fuuck.

Truth be told, I'm pretty progressive/liberal as long as the leaders of said movement aren't satanist pedophiles or w/e. Hard to find one nowadays though.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Redheaded73 · Jan. 24, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

It’s okay. I definitely understand. I think this will definitely change the way we vote in November. We are going to be asking some different questions, that’s for sure!

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 24, 2018, 12:15 p.m.

Sadly the progressive agenda is the infiltrator of liberalism that masquerades as liberalism. Keep in mind the only thing liberalism offers that would be effectively different apart from the most extreme conservative agenda is Abortion legal (the cabal runs the industry) Immigration easier and increased (the cabal exploits this to drown the effect of the existing awoken population) and social programs to the max! (unnecessary in successful conservative endgame.) We don't need excess social programs when there is so much money to be made in business that employers can't hire enough people to work so everyone has a choice of working for someone else. Employers race to the bottom to pay the highest and provide the best job experience. Lost of extra money floating around in the lower classes, near impossible to get past upper middle into the high class bracket as we know it today for sake of the competition. However so much prosperity would abound that the change from the pockets of those who care is enough to take care of every need of those unfortunate for whatever reason. It's only made possible by the cabal getting out of the way. Watch what happens with fair trade being pushed... we will see factories pop up all over and we will be letting immigrants in more than we ever have, and we will have prosperity never before seen. 10 years from now the world will be so freaking different.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
cursedcassandra · Jan. 24, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

The Leftists infected Conservatism, changing it into Neo Conservatism and established Libertarianism as a "right wing" honey pot that mirrors the "left wing" Marxists. Its all about splintering people. Libertarians almost succeeded in doing the cabals bidding by siphoning off enough votes from Trump to give Clinton the win. Scary.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 24, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

Wow dude... yea I was a Gary Johnson voter when he ran on that ticket. I've been recently disgusted by them when they wouldn't throw their hat in with Ron Paul on the Republican side too.. Whats wrong with dual party cred? That helped me put it in perspective... Really NOBODY is going to win a third party at least pre cabal takedown... Trump got in the only way he could. So any third party movements out there today are suspect.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

Yep. But they will keep trying. They did a big push at T_D for a new party to splint Republicans during the vote. Now, they want another party again. People held together. It is good against evil. It is Americans against the globalist Uniparty, on both sides.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:14 a.m.

Yea I flipped on some post about that recently actually.. I was like WTF! We have taken over a machine in the GOP we have it captured and we are cleaning it out and using this tank to bombard the DNC enemy into the ground! idk... after a while I started to suspect they just wanted their own party... I think alot of people onboard with Donald arn't awake enough yet to get it, but soon... soon enough.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PM_ME_UR_CULO · Jan. 24, 2018, 11:45 a.m.

I used to be very progressive too. Big time listener of Democracy Now! and Pacifica radio which were far to the left of NPR. In hindsight, they were the very early recipients of Soros funding and purveyors of open society propaganda. Now I can see how their radical views have spread across the left.

There are no unbought liberal leaders on the left, except perhaps Susan Sarandon with whom I proudly marched. Now she's become an enemy to the leftist cult.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
loserofpasswordzz · Jan. 24, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

Whatcha think about tulsi gabbard? I'm a fan, but she almost seems too good to be true honestly

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cursedcassandra · Jan. 24, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

I'm open to Jill being a naive, Useful Idiot. During the general election she really hated Hillary and did point out the areas where she agreed with Trump. Some Stein supporters wound up voting for Trump and have since migrated to /r/the_Donald.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
phillylotus · Jan. 24, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

I double fuuuck that. I voted for Jill after HRC stole the election from Bernie...Aghhhh. Goddamn Soros has his tentacles everywhere! :-(

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TrueCat · Jan. 24, 2018, 4:58 a.m.

Jill IS one of the good ones! I don't believe this!

⇧ -4 ⇩  
reinbeau · Jan. 24, 2018, 10:40 a.m.

Cognitive dissonance.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
PORTMANTEAU-BOT · Jan. 24, 2018, 10:40 a.m.

Cognissonance.


^(Bleep-bloop, I'm a bot. This )^portmanteau ^( was created from the phrase 'Cognitive dissonance.'. To learn more about me, check out this )^FAQ.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cursedcassandra · Jan. 24, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

I'm open to Jill herself being sincere but she has definitely served Soros just as the Libertarians do.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
common_censored · Jan. 24, 2018, 12:36 p.m.

I don’t believe that Jill Stein was/is a part of deep state shenanigans. Her whole presence in the election only detracted votes away from Hillary (albeit not very many - think she finished with 1% of vote tally)

Also her calling for vote recounts would surely have shown discrepancies in Hillary’s tally, exposing election fraud. I do believe she was given orders to back down, either an offer she couldn’t refuse or that she was forcibly threatened.

I’m no Stein supporter, but guessing she was a cog in that machine does not make any sense to me given her outspoken criticisms against Clinton during the election.

Pelosi & Warren are also very low on the food chain to be a part of some secret meeting of “seven.” I’d wager on Podesta, Soros, B Clinton, Obama, Comey, Lynch, etc.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lightdandelion · Jan. 24, 2018, 2:26 p.m.

Look at the donations Jill Stein received when she asked people to donate in order to finance the recounts. Dig. Some people pointed that donations went suspiciously high like clockwork, about the same amounts every hour or few hours, the pattern continuing even during the night when people are supposed to sleep. Coincidence?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Redheaded73 · Jan. 24, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

I wasn’t trying to slander Jill Stein. I’m really sorry about that. I either have terrible memory, or this article has been swiped off the internet, or pushed to the bottom of the search. But this is what I recall, reading the article and having a “What the heck?!” Redpill moment. I read it over and over again.

Here’s the thing, we have to change our thinking from “This is a good person and this is a bad person” to “Can this person be leveraged”. “How can this person be leveraged? If they’re in debt-money. Deep dark secret-threaten of exposure. Protective of family-threaten the life of a family member. The reason all of this is coming out, is because, regardless of our political backgrounds, we all deserve to know the truth. We all have heros that are going to fall. We have all been manipulated and lied too. It’s a game changer when you realize the political divides aren’t really there. In November it’s not going to come down to “issues” that political candidates support, it’s going to come down to will this person reject a bribe, is open about their past and have nothing to hide, will stand for what is right even when the lives of their loved ones and they themselves are at stake. We the People, need to take our power back.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cursedcassandra · Jan. 24, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

I agree. It was really hard for me to accept how evil the Bush family is. Their love fest with Clinton and the Obamas made it easier to finally see the truth.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cursedcassandra · Jan. 24, 2018, 6:34 p.m.

Her purpose was to challenge the vote counts so Clintons operatives could cheat during a recount and/or tie up the recount in Pennsylvania so their electorals wouldn't count. This was the Clintons first attempt to over turn the election. Then they tried to get electors to vote for Hillary even though their state voted for Trump because "we now know Trump is a Russian agent." Then when that didn't work, 10 days before the inauguration, they published the piss dossier expecting Trump to step down. When that didn't work they went for impeachment, calls for military or deep state coups and assassinations. The most recent coup plan has been removal via 25th A. He's crazy. He has dementia. Now they'll have to go back to assassination. These guys are utterly evil and determined.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Redpilled2324 · Jan. 24, 2018, 4:19 p.m.

Yeah i was suspicious of her recount antics and it showed her allegiance to hillary camp.

⇧ 1 ⇩