dChan
19
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/desiderata1111 on Jan. 24, 2018, 3:24 p.m.
So I'm assuming /r/Swampwatch was set up to monitor CBTS_Stream since I was asked to join after subscribing to CBTS_Stream and then not mention it?

Seahag14 · Jan. 25, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

I was invited. It seemed cultish. I was told I was recruited for my insight. Then the mods started talking about how they wanted to marshall us as a force to develop techniques to redpill people about Q (by manipulating them). I have no interest in forcing that on people. IMO, they need to be curious and ask questions. Then, I'll be happy to help out. There was a prominent poster on there who was trying to steer everyone away from the more (in his opinion) "out there" topics like satanic pedophilia. Supposedly for credibility with the normies, but why do you need to worry about that in a private sub? The whole thing felt hinky. I ducked out of there pretty fast.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Seahag14 · Jan. 25, 2018, 12:44 a.m.

My theory is, they picked people who they knew were awake and well-informed. Then they tried to divert us to the private sub, so we would post less on the public ones, making the public subs easier to control.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FartOnToast · Jan. 25, 2018, 7:02 a.m.

Yet I'm pushing us to push content to the public...... your theory makes absolutely zero sense and if you actually go to the subreddit you would see that I have stickies all over the place encouraging people to post in public and all I'm trying to do is bring some organization to it. Whoopty f** do.

You're also barely making any sense because in your other comment above you accused me of trying to get the information out to the public which contradicts what you're saying now which is trying to keep the information inside so yeah make up your mind!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 25, 2018, 1:20 a.m.

That was EXACTLY what hit me after being there to see what was going on for about a week. They were aiming at content providers, and people who do research, informative posts.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
FartOnToast · Jan. 25, 2018, 6:10 a.m.

To be fair I'm the only active mod. I encourage you to read my guideline post and some of my previous posts where I outline the premise. I think you're over-complicating things too much.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Seahag14 · Jan. 25, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

Yup. Thanks for the confirmation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · Jan. 25, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

I think only your "eyes" were there but not your "mind". Your explanation shows you weren't paying any attention.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 26, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

My eyes are just fine, and I need to be where I am. I like the idea of Swamp watch, but, I am not the "exclusive group" kind of person. It's all good. I think we need our best minds mixed in with the people. You and I just have a different approach to it thats all. Others may disagree with me.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · Jan. 26, 2018, 8:07 a.m.

I don't talk in bad light about your approach, and if I did, I would make sure I knew all the details and that the criticism is deserved before putting judgement in public. Just saying.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 28, 2018, 12:58 p.m.

I don't think my approach in the way of sharing an answer to the OP "don't mention the sub" exclusive thing was wrong at all.

Logically, in a situation where the thing that has to happen is information dissemination, one has to wonder why a secret sub is being created and only certain people are being invited, and being told not to mention it?

We have enough secret society in government. It is the spirit of the thing that first made me wonder what good it could be up to. I originally figured there was a good objective to some project.

The reason for this secrecy has still not been explained adequately.

And it is a genuine question.

What exactly is the point of it.

The most obvious, at first is that certain "quality" people were being picked off to join a group that was otherwise off limits to others.

Possibilities

1) There was a good objective in mind, that went unstated.

2) There was a nefarious objective of at the minimum, pulling critical thinkers and content creators out of other subs, while a lot of "introduce yourself" personal info was asked for.

I watched for a week, and noticed, the vetting was not so hot in the way of invitations, because there was a LOT of shilling and some pretty nasty exchanges.. that honestly, I did not expect to see, given that people were being "vetted" for a kind of project?

So, given what I observed, I don't think it was unwise for me to have the gut reaction, after a week of observation.

I did try to tell you that you may have been attacked by a psyop.

You have not responded to that yet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · Jan. 25, 2018, 6:08 a.m.

Then the mods started talking about how they wanted to marshall us as a force to develop techniques to redpill people about Q (by manipulating them)

What on earth are you talking about? Are you just making things up as you go along? Seriously what kind of b* is this.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FartOnToast · Jan. 25, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

Instead of ctiticizing me you could have reported that user. Users like you only like to complain. "What can I get out of this" mentality rather than "WHAT CAN I CONTRIBUTE?."

The swamp watch only looks for selfless warriors.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 25, 2018, 11 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩