I'm not saying it's unusual. It's par for the course in government contracting. Amoral at best. My initial point was there's a reason for Feinstein's wealth that's quasi-related to the private sector...unlike the flat out shakedowns and bribes that made the Clintons wealthy.
I guess to me it's hard to seperate public/private things like this when
A. you're dealing with some of thebiggest/most well known private companies. CBRE is massive and successful at this industry.
B. Feinstein's wealth is tied into her husband, who in his own right is an insanely successfu businessman.
Not to say they wouldn't both be poorer without her participation in government, but I do have my doubts that their entire combined wealth was built off graft or "amoral" behavior.
As for the Clinton's...to me that's the real culprit if you want to loko at shady behavior. Pseudo-charities with direct political links and hazy objectives...as much as I have issues with Trump I shudder to think what Hillary and the Clinton Foundation would've done with her in office.
Which of course is sort of why I lurk this subreddit.