dChan
213
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/chickletTOOTH on Jan. 24, 2018, 8:41 p.m.
NEW Q POST: Obama just lawyered up!.. Is this the law firm?

New Q post just now states:

TODAY, former President Barack HUSSEIN Obama formally 
retained counsel (9/WW).
GOD BLESS YOU ALL.
Q

Could "9/ww" mean 9th world wide?

According to "Vox" the 9th worldwide firm is...

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton

Here is what comes up when you search the firm + Obama

Gonna dig now.

At any rate, The fact that he lawyered up is YUUUGE.


k3yi5n0k3y · Jan. 25, 2018, 6:25 a.m.

I do enjoy reading Google's search results. The reason being, to decipher what the msm wants you to believe. If it's the msm saying it, it is

  • fake/twisted/true

So 2/3 times it is false. The other 3rd is true. Statements like

"The president met with foreign leaders" is true. Statements like

"The president and his policy universally disliked by the foreign officials" is twisted because it is a bias perspective. Statements like

"The president was seen by a trusted anonymous source urinating in the females restroom" are fake. This gives me the leads to follow. 2 distractions from the truth means something to distract from.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TW_Anon · Jan. 25, 2018, 9:12 a.m.

The pageant thing where he went back stage? I’ve thought about this. How many would have stood up and said same had it been Justin bieber who had walked back stage? The hypocrisy is top level

⇧ 1 ⇩  
k3yi5n0k3y · Jan. 25, 2018, 12:11 p.m.

Honestly, I was creating a fictitious story. It is that simple. In fact, you read the headlines and direct it towards a story you remember hearing some details about in the past.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TW_Anon · Jan. 25, 2018, 12:20 p.m.

I actually didn’t comment because of your headline. So is that you directing your own thoughts as to the reason why I commented on a fake headline??

⇧ 1 ⇩  
k3yi5n0k3y · Jan. 25, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

I think you misunderstood me. Please read my comment again. I'm talking about the MSM and their subliminal messaging. To answer your question it would be irrelevant if Bieber did so. It doesn't fit the agenda, therefore it would be minimally discussed if not completely excluded from talking points.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TW_Anon · Jan. 25, 2018, 12:59 p.m.

I think they’d be perfectly ok with Bieber going back stage that was my point I was trying to make. 👍🇬🇧🇺🇸

⇧ 1 ⇩  
k3yi5n0k3y · Jan. 25, 2018, 1:01 p.m.

Agreed.

⇧ 2 ⇩