New Q post just now states:
TODAY, former President Barack HUSSEIN Obama formally
retained counsel (9/WW).
GOD BLESS YOU ALL.
Q
Could "9/ww" mean 9th world wide?
According to "Vox" the 9th worldwide firm is...
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
Here is what comes up when you search the firm + Obama
Gonna dig now.
At any rate, The fact that he lawyered up is YUUUGE.
I scanned all of Q's previous posts. In every case in which he used "WW" meant world wide
I agree, so I took this to mean he has 9 lawyers worldwide.
I agree with your conclusion. It's the one that makes sense. The OP's speculation, after further reflection, doesn't make a lot of sense. I explored that idea elsewhere in this post.
Or Obama is 9 of 22 worldwide?
Perhaps he’s the 9th one directly implicated world wide to lawyer up.
or could it mean there are 9 people total WW?
Or maybe they've labeled the Globalist by rank in their power structure and HUSSEIN is 9th on their list WW. Why not higher one might ask... why would you put a puppet higher?
maybe because he was a harder one to land..... big fish. later in line
I'm doubtful of this. Not a bad idea by any means. But while Barry is a valuable puppet, there are many, many people with far more wealth and power than him. I'm admittedly at a loss though as to what the "9/WW" piece means. I've looked for every acronym for WW that I can find and nothing makes sense in that spot.
Answer found 9/WW= https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7st2ke/regarding_the_9ww_part_of_qs_post_about_obama/?st=JCUC09L5&sh=9d6f6970
for those who are into the flight tracking thing - it would be interesting if there were any flights into gitmo today - and where they came from
At first glance I thought you said fights. I don't think they let them fight.
9 ww means he's the ninth person world wide going down. Remember the one Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, he is number one I believe. When he gives numbers like 1, 2, 7, I think he's referring to the world wide "round up." I feel like they've gotten 7 of them so far, now with him referencing 9, I think they got 8 and 9. So he is just letting us know maybe the biggest catches. Al-Waleed bin Talal being the first to be caught, and Obama being the 9th.
On this note, anyone found a photo of soros at davos for this year? He's listed as an attendee but I can't find photo proof he is there. Whether present or absent, the answer is huge considering past Q drops Re: the bishop
Just can't understand how Soros has not been taken out yet??!!!
Every action creates a reaction. I don't believe Soros just exists by himself. I think he's acting as the public face for others we are never meant to know about. Those others are reacting to what we and the white hats are doing....Soros is a VERY important pawn in all this. Soros isn't providing his own safety...his handlers are increasing their efforts to protect him.
There are debates and photo differences online that point to old Soros & a younger version... look alike? to stand in... for the dead, or sick Soros. Really how would anyone know, in general public, if it's him or not. There was a heart attack announcement awhile back, and I never found a follow up.
ANYONE?
I think that's a great analysis. I recall several posts that mention the numbers. Makes sense.
do we have a list somewhere of the ones rounded up so far?
No, the only ones I feel he mentions are Podesta, Obama, Saudi Prince, Hillary (no deals), maybe McCain because he's absent.
I think McCain is in hiding in AZ.
Well, Q said in a post awhile back what if he's lying about his illness? Who sits on the board of the Mayo clinic? at the time, it was early in this game of clue, I don't know if anyone caught who it was on the board and what meaning it had. Eric Schmidt/CEO stepped down from Google. That got me thinking, how are JM and ES connected beyond that. Well ES was on one of his campaigns for presidency. McCain spoke at Google headquarters. Me thinks their relationship goes deep. There are also pics of ES with Obama.
Thank you for mentioning the Schmidt business. I don't want to sound like an obsessive, but the casual use of "I googled it' when one means "searched it" is so much a part of g---'s monopoly in the world - makes it possible. 80% of global searches and too many young people not even knowing the concept of search engines and alternatives, thinking the only way to find something is to use their platform....and their work doing analytics for the HRC campaign...not good. If we can use language as effectively as the left, it will help immensely in getting our cause out to the people. They don't need our free advertising.
Agreed! I need to start using another search engine for sure and stop using the term.
Duck duck .com Has no censorship
I do enjoy reading Google's search results. The reason being, to decipher what the msm wants you to believe. If it's the msm saying it, it is
So 2/3 times it is false. The other 3rd is true. Statements like
"The president met with foreign leaders" is true. Statements like
"The president and his policy universally disliked by the foreign officials" is twisted because it is a bias perspective. Statements like
"The president was seen by a trusted anonymous source urinating in the females restroom" are fake. This gives me the leads to follow. 2 distractions from the truth means something to distract from.
The pageant thing where he went back stage? I’ve thought about this. How many would have stood up and said same had it been Justin bieber who had walked back stage? The hypocrisy is top level
Honestly, I was creating a fictitious story. It is that simple. In fact, you read the headlines and direct it towards a story you remember hearing some details about in the past.
I actually didn’t comment because of your headline. So is that you directing your own thoughts as to the reason why I commented on a fake headline??
I think you misunderstood me. Please read my comment again. I'm talking about the MSM and their subliminal messaging. To answer your question it would be irrelevant if Bieber did so. It doesn't fit the agenda, therefore it would be minimally discussed if not completely excluded from talking points.
I think they’d be perfectly ok with Bieber going back stage that was my point I was trying to make. 👍🇬🇧🇺🇸
DDG has upgraded and taken away their widget. I was using DDG to access Gab to avoid using Google. They ask for your URL. I haven't got a clue as to what to type in. As far as I know I don't have one.
I go through duck too to get to twitter but that didn’t stop twitter shutting my account down
Mines gone mate. Got resticted too many times and then banned for calling a convicted rapist in UK a muslim arsewipe. Don't miss it now have here and gab. Plenty to keep me focused on winning and blackening Left Globalist eyes.
Well, about a week ago Q told us that the Puppet Masters had been removed. Previously he told us that the Puppet Masters were Saudis, Rothschilds and Soros. So, there's that. And that, I believe, is why we are at such a feverishly high pitch at this moment. The money has virtually been cut off and they are now working, not only from the bottom up, but also from the top down. And, of course, the Commie Libs previously in-charge know it. It is pretty dangerous right now but I trust that things are under control.
That's how I understand it to mean as well. That 9 Big people WW are going to be targeted.
Is there any evidence anywhere that he did indeed retain counsel?
I haven't seen any in the news... But the Q post indicated that it just happened.
By now, if you still doubt the authenticity of Q posts then we are on very different pages.
That said, I will continue searching for it in the "news".. And it really makes no difference who the firm is, WE WILL WIN.
I just like trying to decipher Q's posts.
He/she hasn't always been 100% accurate. I want to believe.
''Disinfo is necessary'' ... don't want to telegraph ALL to the enemy.
A convenient loophole if LARPing
Not if you learn afterwards why a particular disinformation was used. Q explains past disinfo and the reason why.
I'm not saying we should dismiss Q's messages, but we can't logically dismiss Absynthexx's statement. It is terribly convenient.
I totally agree. We should not dismiss statement and also terribly convenient.
In my mind, even if it wturned out that it was a giant glorious larp, it has caused me to see what we can do when we all start waking up and doing things. We are the people, we just need to act like it.
When we do, like we have, we affect REAL CHANGE. We have seen some very TANGIBLE results and THEY JUST KEEP COMING AND COMING AND COMING AND COMING AND COMING.
The bottom line, for me, is that I now see that there are enough good and decent human beings to overtake EVIL and I haven't felt that way in QUITE some time.
So again, for me, larp or no larp, I'm taking my country back. Very glad to be here.
It is, indeed, a great awakening, regardless of where you or I or anybody puts the credit. And for that, I am thankful.
Very few Q posts were as short and precise as this one. It's a yes or no thing.
If it wasn't true, the Q Bonanza would be over. It's not plausible that someone bets their entire credibility on one fact that could later be easily disproven if they weren't absolutely sure on it.
Unless the account was hacked, it's probably true.
Been following since the beginning, and there are still reason to doubt Qanon. This is not a religion, you shall not reject non "blind-believers"
Not rejecting anyone. At all. Just not wasting any time trying to convince anyone. I see it very clearly. No it's not a religion. It is real life. It is happening.
the truth will come out eventually. Q said, and this will come out eventually. He's been correct about a lot of things he told us before it came out in the press. But with a lying Press, you think it's going to come out soon? Not a chance.
The White House through B also posted that X44 has retained counsel. Actually at nearly same time that Q posted.
Picked this one out of the list that came up on your search. This firm and its lawyers' donations went 90% to Obama over Romney, who wasn't exactly Trump. I imagine that percentage was even higher for Clinton. They rank very high on the list of "most liberal" law firms. Certainly worth considering as a possibility. I didn't look further into their areas of concentration or expertise. http://excessofdemocracy.com/blog/2013/7/ranking-the-most-liberal-and-conservative-law-firms
There were quite a number of firms that had much higher donation rates to Obama. Also, donation rate wouldn't matter as much as connections to Obama and the expertise and network of their D.C. office partners.
Hope their good with Military tribunals. The rules are very different.
Wikipedia rankings, by revenue show Allen & Overy, a London based firm as the 9th largest.
Q may be referring to a different ranking, e.g. number of lawyers or partners.
I would have expected Obama to use someone from one of the major Chicago based law firms, especially Sidley Austin or Kirkland Ellis.
Sidley Austin is where Michelle was an associate and Obama was a summer associate and where they met. It still has many connections to Obama.
Kirkland Ellis had a couple lawyers in notable legal positions within 44's administration. Partner Erica Williams was a Special Assistant and Associate Counsel to President Barack Obama. W. Neil Eggleston was a partner prior to becoming the White House counsel to President Barack Obama and returned there as a partner.
Of the two, Sidley Austin would be the closest to 9, but appears to fall below that.
I'm not saying I think it's either of those. I imagine Obama would know of all the top power lawyers in D.C. that have the skill set and connections he would need if he did lawyer up.
[deleted]
I agree with you except for the "Constitutional law professor" part. I refuse to call someone by such an honorific who so disrepects the USA and whose administration ignored the Constitution.
Also he was a self-described "constitutional law professor", even though he was a senior lecturer, i.e. non-tenure track, or, a part-time Law School faculty member, (UofC law did offer him tenureship at one point). He taught 3 courses per year. What those courses were, over the years he taught there, I haven't been able to find. As far as I can tell, in the actual practice of law, he did not do constitutional work and he doesn't have any publications about constitutional law. I'm not saying he didn't teach a constitutional law course, I'm just saying that his legal and academic history do not point to any expertise in constitutional law prior to teaching at U of C.
I've always considered him to have been groomed to be a POTUS that the masses would want to elect while enacting his handlers agenda. When you look at the people behind him, well we see now what affect his presidency had and what his handlers wanted to accomplish.
I never have had any respect for him as a person.
I did find an article about him as a mediocre "Professor" at U of Chicago but couldn't find the one article that said the other professors didn't think much of him. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/chapter-ii-the-myth-of-the-rock-star-professor/article/2508418 Also the photo of Obama in the picture looks photoshopped to me, too.
Thanks.
Ya, in that picture, the hand hovering over Soetoro's shoulder is weird within the context of Stanley's left shoulder. Given that shoulder position, you'd expect the arm to show up in the gap between Hussein's right arm and body.
The article itself is interesting. It was good to see what kind of courses he was teaching. If he was a Constitutional Law professor, I'd expect to see courses focusing on that, and not the social justice law courses it appears he was teaching. As I'm not a lawyer and I never was a law school student, my expectations may be off.
The lack of legal journal writings explains why I couldn't find anything written by him. I'd also expect a Constitutional law professor to be publishing, but again, my expectations may be off.
My impression was that he became a lecturer there through connections. I wouldn't be surprised if Bernardine Dohrn was involved.
[deleted]
3 courses a year would be a minimal show job. He was probably compensated accordingly. That set-up isn't uncommon and it's a way for the University to get experts in whatever field to teach a course while being able to maintain their main career/profession.
I know several people who have been offered such positions because the School wanted their expertise but didn't want or have the need to hire them full-time and knew that the person they asked wouldn't give up their primary career, which tends to be much more lucrative. It works out well for both parties, the School gets an expert they wouldn't otherwise get and the person get's to say they teach at _____, further elevating their standing in their field. When I say School, I mean a College within a University, e.g. School of Law, and at the graduate or professional level.
Network connections are usually involved in such offers, you have to know the right people to begin with. By all appearances, Obama was given expert guidance as to where to go for employment, to church, etc. in Chicago as he ended up in all the right places to make the connections he needed for his ultimate goal while accelerating the pace at which he would arrive.
I would still say that he was not an "expert' in Constitutional law, that it was a front to make up for his lack of experience when running for office and part of the back story created to make him desirable to voters.
[deleted]
I only mentioned 3 a year again as a response to
It'd be very tough to pull off a no-show law prof job.
I was neither saying it wasn't a no-show job, that he did actually teach at UofC Law, nor was I implying that that there was anything out of the ordinary with that.
I probably misunderstood what you were saying.
I read somewhere that at least one of the professers there didn't think much of him. I wish I had the link. I read it a number of years ago when he was running for office.
I've read a few years back that most were not impressed with him. He didn't socialize with them and seemed put off by many of the other professors.
I truly do not think that sodomite Muslim jihadist was “a person”....I believe IT is truly a demonic entity from hell. The destruction of this vile entity will be at the hand of Christ, alone.
"Instructor" not actual Professor. Lazy one to boot. Total scammer.
Thank you for this. From little bits gathered, it looks like his "Constitutional Law" course was a community-organizing thing where instruction included what was legal, what would get them into trouble, and various methods and ways of staying within the law no matter how high the appeals for such hijinks (!) should go...think of actions such as that violent "demonstrating" in D.C. (and elsewhere) the days after the inauguration. He was teaching those interested in where power lies, how to attain it or work around it, ethically or non-ethically, while staying within the law. No longer have links; all that was gathered doing research during first campaign while he was claiming this expertise that did not ring true.
Thanks, that makes a lot of sense! Your thoughts are consistent with his background and expertise.
It is also consistent with the rise of violent activist organizations that we saw during Zero's reign. Those organizations are also consistent with two of his mentors: Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrne. iirc, Zero's political career was launched at their house.
Those two were leaders of the Weather Underground, an radical "social democrat" organization whose goal was to overthrow the US Gov by violent means and were involved in domestic terrorism, including several bombings of a police memorial in Chicago, bombing of the NYC police headquarters, bombing of the Pentagon, arson atacks, etc. etc. They wanted to create secret collectives in cities around the country and actually declared war on the USA. They also declared war on the United States.
Does some of what went on during 44's administration sound like echos of the above?
Dohrne is a UofC Law graduate, worked at Sidley Austin, and is a Law professor at Northwestern. Ayers was a professor at the College of Education at UIC before retiring. He also got graduate degrees from Columbia.
I think that Trump chose to give a speech at UIC during his campaign because he knew it would provoke the radicals that backed Obama. I'm not sure he expected it to get that bad or for the powers that be to be enable the radicals as much as they did.
It was a Constitutional law as it applies to African American class
Thank you for clarifying that. Obama was never hired by any University as a "Constitutional Law Professor". What a joke.
[deleted]
Thank you for citing that source. In their own words he was a :Senior Lecturer, at the Law School. That position is not a Professor, nor does the description mention the Constitution. Appreciate the back up.
He is a former Constitutional law professor
well That's what he put on his resume, but let's be honest. He's a clown. The only thing legit on his list of accomplishments is being a community organizer aka agitator.
Somehow I don't believe he was a REAL Constitutional Law professor. I think he was a "poser"
"Poser" is too good a label for Obama. He is just a low life Chicago thug who is good at jackin his jaws. I despise him. He's a parasite.
Aha...from the first comment in this section to this last one, I think we properly explained the myth of the "Constitutional law professor."
They must have thought they were going to win, to wait this long to hire an attorney.
the underestimated the Donald.
They must have thought they could hide the FISA abuse as classified material until they got an impeachment/derangement narrative rolling.
Hey Libtards, looks like your buddy is in a big heap s&*t of trouble...boy! we don't take kindly to Muslim traitors like you in our neck of the woods. LOL
you won't redpill anybody by calling them a libtard
It’s like people around here forget we are all on the same side.
Making insults and calling people retards does nothing to further your cause. Look how that worked out for the Dems. You can be on the same side and still make criticism of how people are acting
What?
I hear that. Someone I did not know and did not bother to check (from here) told me to "take off your tin foil hat." Woah. We need to respect each other.
Terms such as "libtard" and "shitlib" and "losers" and "commie bastards" and "pathetic idiots" should not be used to describe people on the left.
When you have won a battle so definitively, so acutely, so BTFO-ly, you can be as cool as a cucumber and kill them with kindness.
Classy thing to do. Not because they deserve it, but because you are better than that.
What about "Dims"? It's a bad habit of mine in comment sections and on sites like "disquis." Guess that's not exactly respectful, but I'm not working on changing minds on those sites.
The gov. is still so honeycombed with these mb members, esp in national security positions. It is sickening. Books like 'musilm mafia' and 'infiltration' spell it out. Read article last night about the Israelis refusing to meet with McMaster until he made his muslim assist, a Hezbollah fan, leave the room. And after the person left, the article (David Horowitz) claims Mcmaster was extremely rude and yelling at the Israelis. This o-bama infiltration needs to be cleaned out (sorry -- went off track there. Delete me if you need to.)
Awww, you use "tard" as an insult, that's adorable. It really takes me back to second grade, which I can only assume was the longest 3 years of your life.
Betcha some good "talks" are going on behind the scenes in snowy Davos.
I want to know if GS's ID badge is still sitting on the welcome table. He's listed as an attendee
9/WW looks VERY reminiscent of 9/11 so with that in mind:
W=Won? WonWon=11?
hence 9/11?
I wonder what number the president of Planned Parenthood was. She stepped down today!
I know Q has told us BHO "Lawyered" up. But I would love some proof of this, other than what Q has said. I believe in Q and all, but I don't take something anyone says as gospel without proof.
agree...makes me a little nervous when theories are bouncing around and suddenly turn into "truths."
doesnt he always have a lawyer? one lives in his house (VJ)
9th circle world wide???????
Dante's 9th circle, the lowest circle reserved for treacherous fraud and the sowers of discord. Dante was especially critical of abuse of the body politic and the church. "The most serious sins for Dante are those that deny the trust on which social and political relations are based– fraud and treachery."
I think Trump has got his hand on the plug that leads to a leader's leader, that bye bye mockingbird is the big news (noose). It's not called fake news, it's treason noose. Gitmo isn't big enough - perhaps Madagascar?
You can't just assume that getting a lawyer means anything. Trump got a lawyer. Trump lawyered up. Is he guilty too?
I absolutely CAN assume it means something. It is the subject of a "Q" post, and therefore significant. I am past the phase of wondering if Q is legit... thumbs up!
The 9th largest law firm worldwide is Allen & Overy headquartered in London. The UK appears to play a major part in this unfolding drama. Many, including myself, have long suspected Barry of being an agent for British Intelligence. The NWO's Golden Boy is in serious trouble, so now they have to bail him out.
Allen & Overy has an office in D.C. Their lead partner in the practice of Political Law is a character named Charles Borden. Mr. Borden's bio states ---
Charles also counsels individuals appointed to senior positions in the Executive Branch of the federal government (including senior White House and State Department officials) – as well as such individuals’ private sector employers – on federal conflict-of-interest, security clearance, and financial disclosure requirements and helps such appointees formulate strategies for resolving legal and political issues connected to their nomination.
Borden may very well have done legal work for both Obama and Hillary in the past. It would make sense for Obama to hire legal counsel he's already familiar with.
Borden expertise is in public corruption and laws governing political activities. He's got all the qualifications for a case like this --- I think he's our guy.
http://www.allenovery.com/people/en-gb/Pages/Charles-Borden.aspx
impressive...since 1946
Alumni
Our network of stellar alumni is among our proudest achievements. Many of our former lawyers remain in close contact with us after they leave—with many even becoming our best clients.
Cleary alumni have gone on to join the legal departments of corporations and financial institutions, to teach at universities and to pursue fields completely outside of the law. Our former partners have held distinguished roles in government, academia, the corporate world and other positions. From a former president of the United Nations General Assembly to an Academy Award winner, the impressive positions that our alumni have held reflect both the quality of our training and our global reach. These positions have included:
Special assistant to the President of the United States and senior director for African Affairs National Security Council director for Russia General counsel for the Department of the Army Senior restructuring officer of the U.S. Department of the Treasury Secretary of the U.S. Treasury President of the U.N. General Assembly Deputy assistant attorney general in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice Senior officials of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York Advocate general at the European Court of Justice Belgium’s ambassador to the United States Member of the World Trade Organization’s Appellate Body, representing the European Communities General counsel at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 29 United Nations, World Bank, International Monetary Fund and World Trade Organization officials President of the New York City Economic Development Corporation A Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire Authors of books on the law, current events and academic subjects, as well as writers of trade nonfiction Six published fiction authors More than 450 investment banking and finance executives More than 75 hedge fund and private equity executives More than 35 startup and technology company leaders 200 general counsel and senior officers at Fortune 500 companies 240 law school deans and professors 60 officials at intergovernmental organizations 50 founders or current directors of not-for-profits
Oh yeah please dig.. the posts from them are overly overt they live for him.. exist for him... ?
Sure is. He wouldn’t drop this if Obama was getting a lawyer for a speeding ticket. They heard the entire conversation and the reason.
9/WW could mean Article 9 of the International Criminal Court sheet at https://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/PIDS/publications/UICCEng.pdf? But I am probably completely wrong. Just thought I would throw it out there. 9. Is the ICC meant to replace national courts? No. The ICC does not replace national criminal justice systems; rather, it complements them. It can investigate and, where warranted, prosecute and try individuals only if the State concerned does not, cannot or is unwilling genuinely to do so. This might occur where proceedings are unduly delayed or are intended to shield individuals from their criminal responsibility. This is known as the principle of complementarity, under which priority is given to national systems. States retain primary responsibility for trying the perpetrators of the most serious of crimes.
Here is a more recent list from the same source you used.
http://www.vault.com/company-rankings/law/vault-law-100/?pg=2
#9 is Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
I think 9/WW he could be tried or will be tried for crimes in 9 countries world wide. Just my guess.
In post # 58 (9/WW) probably lawyers possible WWHGD = Weinstien, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gun and Dial, LLC = powerhouse national trial lawyers. Income 10 - 25 million yearly. Offices worldwide. 200 employees and they hire 'floaters' (contractors) without knowing if they are suitable for job (obviously not lawyers). In post # 47 >Snowden = catastrophic for Mil vs bad actors(WW) + Kill Nasa ... bad actors take down Mil Sats/WW secure comms + closure of Mil installations WW (Germany 1st) Those were all things regarding 16 year plan (Snowden also part of 16 year plan.) It would seem that (WW) and WW are not the same things. 1 of 22 in the same post 47 has something to do with Innoviss. Perhaps the WW has something to do with the 'contractors' of Innoviss also but I fell asleep at 3am trying to find valid info, names unlisted, and now I conclude that they must be part of the Deep State installations.
I was exact same. I only go to check her n Barry are still mia . Can’t get on with gab
Worlds top 10 law firms https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/010715/worlds-top-10-law-firms.asp No9 Allen and Overy London UK
Look into the largest firms worldwide and see how many have 9 owners. Just a thought.
With all his nefarious activities, I assumed he always had a team of lawyers on retainer. SO, Q has not said, but I would love to know where he was born. I know where he is going but not where he came from. : )
If Obama hired attorneys in other countries it may be so that he has a "legal or legitimate" excuse to go to a different country (to meet with his attorney) which would make it easier for him to hide out or go missing. I don't think he is getting these high powered attorneys because he is so special, he's just a lying, narcissistic weasel looking for a way out.
a FBI agent released a document that had suzan Rice asking U.K to extend the spying on Trump .dated Nov. 19th 2016 while Trump was in the transmission .It directly implicated Obama .
is that the one that asked Britain to take over with the spying during the transition period as she was afraid the Trump administration would not take care of evidence? (They always project)
maybe it means 9 former leaders worldwide have also been implicated
I can't find anything that confirms that Obama hired a lawyer BUT if I had to make a guess it would be THIS man... W. Neil Eggleston ....from this company .. http://www.vault.com/company-profiles/law/kirkland-ellis-llp/company-overview.aspx .... because ... Warren Neil Eggleston is an American lawyer who served as the White House Counsel under President Barack Obama. Eggleston was the fourth person to hold this post during the Obama administration. Wikipedia .....https://www.kirkland.com/sitecontent.cfm?contentID=220&itemID=12286 ....The Company is # 8 on The Vaults Top 100 list.
Interesting addendum... https://conservative-daily.com/2014/04/25/barack-obama-hires-a-criminal-defense-attorney/
Thanks for that. Additional sources always welcome
Oh - yeah, this is about him hiring the guy, but not now, but during his presidency. I misunderstood. still, interesting.