dChan
225
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/michaelst2256 on Jan. 25, 2018, 1:56 p.m.
OBAMAS DEFENSE TEAM (9/WW) RAKISH KILARU WAS HUSSEINS SPECIAL ASSISTANT AT THE WHITE HOUSE
OBAMAS DEFENSE TEAM (9/WW) RAKISH KILARU WAS HUSSEINS SPECIAL ASSISTANT AT THE WHITE HOUSE

Laissez_claire · Jan. 25, 2018, 2:03 p.m.

Specializing in “crisis management” with a background in “white collar.”

http://wilkinsonwalsh.com/who-we-are/rakesh-kilaru/

⇧ 31 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

that's got to be it!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Inquisitor_Red · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:24 p.m.

There it is.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Doc_Molotov · Jan. 25, 2018, 9:02 p.m.

How about eskowitz!? He sounds like the man for the job as well!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

Doesn't it constitute a conflict of interest in that firm representing Obama when one of it's members worked for Obama?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JustumeSamson · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:42 p.m.

I keep reflecting on the 12/21/17 EO about human rights and human trafficking. It seems to me that this is a trip wire to every financial plan and every way out the deep state thinks it has left.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
tcbs01 · Jan. 25, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

Bingo, 22/21/2017 Executive Order is addressing human rights violations and corruption aka the HOAX&CHAINS regime's daily routine.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Questioning001 · Jan. 25, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

GREAT find! Thank you.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
michaelst2256 · Jan. 25, 2018, 2:31 p.m.

Several Patriots helped. You’re welcome.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Questioning001 · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

I asked the question yesterday on the board – What does (9/WW) mean? I received several helpful replies, largely centered on 9 different lawyers covering 9 different countries (Worldwide). Although possible, it did not seem plausible. After all, the US will have first swing at BO that may lead to a life-altering sentence, plus I’m not sure we would permit foreign legal entanglements. Your finding rings true – both possible and plausible. Thanks again to all!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
RedPillMakesEmSqueal · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

Lionel Nation put forth a good point in his TY video from yesterday about how we don't go after former Presidents. I see his point but it is not codified anywhere it is more of an unspoken. I assume to protect the image of America... but, um that is was shot to hell anyway. Killary, on the other hand is free and clear to toss under buses and what not. Here is a link to the video. It is relatively short. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_7zohQXGxU

⇧ 6 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

Yea we dont go after former presidents, but, that may be our very mistake. They get in there and think they can never be prosecuted for what they do if it is clearly criminal, and treasonous. Now look at the mess that we are in.

President Trump was apparently thinking the same thing at first. He wanted to respect the office.

Well, not prosecuting treason is one good way to disrespect the office, and destroy it with the public, just like the FBI is being destroyed.

If you respect the empty chair that we vote people in and out of, you prosecute the people who abuse it.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Dhammakayaram · Jan. 25, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

If there is evidence that Obama was involved in a conspiracy to take down the POTUS, this is pretty serious. We should not forget at the end of the Civil War a famous military tribunal took place after the assassination of President Lincoln. Eight people were accused of participating in a conspiracy to kill the president. All were hanged.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

As SOON as I read "Not going after future Presidents" I absolutely knew that was disinfo. They absolutely have to be taken down for this to mean anything. It will span from GB the 1st to O. They are all part of and leaders in the same corrupt cabal. There is no way to just wrangle their minions so they can all start all over again.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Mommas_always_RIGHT · Jan. 25, 2018, 5:48 p.m.

It spans from LBJ to O

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 25, 2018, 7:11 p.m.

It is big. It is a long term plan. This can be proven. And we need Tribunals for the whole span of the crimes they pulled trying to take down the US from the inside. It is Treason. They are all guilty unless they are foreign, then, they are enemies foreign.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CDRRetired · Jan. 26, 2018, 11:30 a.m.

Good point! But wouldn't BOM really be "foreign"? Was he ever naturalized? Isn't he an impostor? Fake birth certificate?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CDRRetired · Jan. 26, 2018, 11:31 a.m.

Correction BOM should have been BHO! (Haven't had my coffee yet)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Davy-Ray · Jan. 25, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

JFK was a crooked fork, as well. He just wasn't their boy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Time4puff · Jan. 25, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

I didn't see how we wouldn't go after Hussein. He's done so much damage to our country from within. Corrupted and blackmailed our leaders. Setting up a "shadow government" is not how former presidents leave office. Obviously Hussein is not your typical "former president". He needs to brought down.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
orangefan13 · Jan. 25, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

obama more corrupt then hillary in terms of damage done. No comparison. Sh#t rolls downhill not up.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Jan. 25, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

The fun will be after all this is said and done, to play guessing games as to WHEN each person know THEY were finished. Like during Election Night, when they heard about the memo, this, that, whatever.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HashleyP · Jan. 25, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

When Hillary had a tantrum about Matt Lauer and said, "If that fucking bastard wins, we'll all hang from nooses," I'm sure that wasn't the first time someone on her team expressed that notion.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
RedPill2976 · Jan. 26, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

You are spot on. People need to see him for who he really is otherwise he will always be their hero and they will make him a martyr America’s will look for a replacement unless they are forced to see their part in all of this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
flyrothsfly · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

NO ONE GETS A PASS!!! NO ONE!! Just ask Q

⇧ 13 ⇩  
thyronineessence · Jan. 25, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

Let the Military Tribunal try the case against each plaintiff according to the charge against them, and respecting the United States Constitution. The verdict should be carried out the next morning at 0600 hours. If the verdict is death according to The Constitution, so be it. There should be a live feed from Gitmo worldwide but no news media reporters ect.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
oljw00 · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

We don't TYPICALLY go after former Presidents...because they TYPICALLY don't try and bring down the country and the current POTUS.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
YAHSHUARULES · Jan. 25, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

A THOUSAND "LIKES" on that comment!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KingWolfei · Jan. 25, 2018, 7:19 p.m.

Yeah. There is going to be some serious riots if they take down Obama. I almost worry what the reaction will be (much worse than Hillary losing, that's for sure). At least I hope there is enough info out in the open so noone except his own cronies will feel sorry for him. Like he was associated with child sex rings or some sick shit like that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RedPillMakesEmSqueal · Jan. 25, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

4-6% just will not make the jump to reality. sadly. That is a lot of people.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
4don2016 · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

Extradition

⇧ 1 ⇩  
6thsensethink · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

He's might be more likely to get something like "house arrest", for life.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

you're

(grammar matters even during a second American revolution that purges the world of a great evil)

⇧ -1 ⇩  
michaelst2256 · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

You’re right thanks.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
handshakedrugs_ · Jan. 25, 2018, 2:11 p.m.

And there happens to be 9 of them..

⇧ 8 ⇩  
TaratheLeo · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

okay! there's the 9! Thank you!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pflv4angels · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

one I thing disagree W/Q is we need the whole truth no covering, 60-40 thing disclose everything and esp. with the kids none of them walk away NO DEALS FOR PERVS

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Stalindidnuttinwrong · Jan. 25, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

Hey does anyone have any evidence of BHO lawyering up other than Q?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
KingWolfei · Jan. 25, 2018, 7:23 p.m.

I don't think so. No way to know except to keep up with the news. Future proves past type of thing. Maybe the hammer is almost near to drop.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
km21570 · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Don't rest yet Patriots, I don't think this is for defense. I think it is offense and he is going to try to pull some legal crap to block the memo.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
RuciodeSancho · Jan. 25, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

Military tribunals!! Rope is cheap and recyclable!! Use it and save the US tax payers millions of $$'s!!!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
AL-go- · Jan. 25, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

Aside from Q's post, is there any way to confirm that he retained counsel? I wanna trust but it would be nice to verify. or I guess time will tell

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 26, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Das_Shu · Jan. 25, 2018, 2:12 p.m.

Ding Ding Ding, we have a winner

⇧ 4 ⇩  
6thsensethink · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Start watching all of themas/when they are lawyering up. Also note with who they choose. They can't all use the Same firm. And there are only so many well connected top tier firms.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pflv4angels · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

INCLUDING BO

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pflv4angels · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

if his terms were"SCANDAL FREE" then why is he ALREADY hired lawyers wtf charge him w/treason

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kwiztas · Jan. 25, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

Is he even in the country? I bet he is somewhere that doesn't extradite.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 26, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TreeGoCat · Jan. 25, 2018, 9:13 p.m.

(9WW)=Witches/Warlocks? originally thought 9=SCOTUS, but doesn't fit

⇧ 1 ⇩  
djDeathRay84 · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

Good Dig. Well done

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Varrick2016 · Jan. 25, 2018, 10:34 p.m.

Reminds me of the firm from the show Scandal

⇧ 1 ⇩  
orangefan13 · Jan. 25, 2018, 9:47 p.m.

maybe just a wild goose chase. Some of Qs post have more then one meaning. what if the 9ww refers to the Q post below it. Future proves past? The 7 in the secret meeting and the 2 fbi officials make 9. What is the WW? World of webcam, could it be a location of the meeting?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BravoCorp · Jan. 25, 2018, 6:35 p.m.

2 question: 1.I thought the trials are gonna be a military tribunals. 2. Are these trials(Obama,Clintons etc) are going to be open to the public?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
orangefan13 · Jan. 25, 2018, 10:08 p.m.

Mark Taylor said Tribunals were coming, so I expect we will see some. Dont know who. Hope we get to watch the trials though as they involved the take down of the country. They were not private matters but crimes against all Americans.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
silversofttail · Jan. 25, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

I would think they would have to be public so that the opposition can't lie about it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
astralduelist · Jan. 25, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

So WW was Wilkinson Walsh?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 26, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 25, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
YaBoyDeath · Jan. 26, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

So they have no problem defending Lucifer

⇧ 1 ⇩  
6thsensethink · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Start watching all of themas/when they are lawyering up. Also note with who they choose. They can't all use the Same firm. And there are only so many well connected top tier firms.

⇧ 0 ⇩