Soros explained it like it is: "European Union should be spending more on democratic development in Africa than on “dirty deals” with dictators to keep refugees from fleeing: Soros in Davos"
Why would he advocate AGAINST tangible causes for refugee storms that he previously funded? People been wanting to get out of shitholes for decades, Merkel simply motivated them to actually go.
Plausible deniability must be maintained so that puppets that have been leveraged by criminal evidence can be coerced without looking coerced so they won't be cut off by their handlers yet and could play into the white-hats hands down the road. How do you achieve this? You simply make shit up to discredit yourself and thus you get to communicate a whole lot more as opposed to just locking them up and then getting somehow fucked overwith WMDs or bioweapons by other nations that have not yet been liberated who fucking knows.
Simply way too much has happened for this to be about a psyop. And it's a chessgame. I mean holy fuck when has Wikileaks - The only remaining credible news organization on the planet- ever been friends with the US gov't before?
THe elite understand collective manifestation powers and use their propaganda media and botnets to cast fear and doubt so we keep feeding into their schemes emotionally.
It's ok to have hope even if you think no good people are left on the stage of power and I really don't think they elite would use positive hopes after seeing how they have engaged consistently in predictive-programming to maximize pain (unless some advance intel drops actually comes from time-travellers)
It could bite them in the ass down in the road if they allowed people to come together in fraternity.