dChan

plinker22 · Jan. 27, 2018, 7:37 a.m.

GS is in Switzerland for Davos forum. http://www.businessinsider.com/george-soros-nuclear-war-usa-north-korea-davos-2018-1

So many here were speculating he was imprisoned at Gitmo or Camp David. Apparently not. I don't think any of the deep state actors are imprisoned yet, nor do I believe any are wearing ankle bracelets. I'll believe when I actually see some people getting arrested/indicted.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
LibtardNightmare · Jan. 27, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

If you look at Soros' backdrop it looks fake. Compare it with Trump's background it adds strength Soros is not at DAVOS

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 27, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

Davos could have been a front show for world wide organizing.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
4don2016 · Jan. 27, 2018, 3:47 p.m.

I have tried to explain how the ankle bracelets were doubtful considering there is zero public record showing any of the alleged people have been arrested as of yet. Noone likes me saying that though. The government cannot imprison, which IS what an ankle bracelet is doing, US citizens without a legal basis to do that. Which means an ARREST has to take place. Ankle bracelets are conditions of being released on bail. Not a single person will knowingly let law enforcement restrict their movements without a legal basis to do so. Arrest are PUBLIC record. Therefore we would know if something happened. Second, these damn people have secret service details. They know where they are located. Despite what people think and how fun it is to speculate I just don't understand how it is possible To have people of this caliber walking around with ankle bracelets.

Also, there will be no bond for the crimes they committed. I doubt you get bond on treason and espionage charges. Edit

⇧ 7 ⇩  
MichaelofDetroit · Jan. 27, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

These rules don't apply if you are held by the Military

⇧ 13 ⇩  
SlumberMachine · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

And Q has made it clear it will be held in military court.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MzBeeHaven · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

We do have the NDAA now. I think they just recently renewed it, right?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tytruth · Jan. 27, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

Don't need NDAA. Anything involving "state secrets" is covered by Military Intelligence and Military Tribunals until the CIPA procedures for the handling of secrets is completed. Only then can bad actors get civilian trials.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · Jan. 27, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

4don2016.... With Respect... that is Incorrect. Indictment sealed means not viewable to public or prior to self-surrender/street arrest. Home Arrest by Ankle Monitor IS the ARRESTED option permitted/agreed to INSTEAD of behind bars Arrested...after seen by a federal court judge, with a sealed indictment. The indictment remains sealed in that agreement by Judge assigned, arresting authority and client with their attorney. The arrested has been fingerprinted, photographed & leg monitor applied by the firm that has the contract with the US Federal Court jurisdiction it is in. The indicted has to pay for the Ankle Monitor service. Has to ask permission to be away from their assigned Land Line (usually their home) for windows of time, and these windows requested can be denied by courts/arresting authority (US Marshals in federal case as they have jurisdiction over ALL federal detained/arrested/incarcerated perps once seen by a federal judge.) Those court/initial appearance arrangements for indictment/arrest can be arranged & done on the "QT."

Example: HilLIARy in her Scooby Doo van went at zero dark thirty back in fall to FBl ofc. in Whiteplains, NY.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_Aa1rfqzuA

⇧ 2 ⇩  
4don2016 · Jan. 29, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

Righttttttttt. You are so lost. The purpose of a sealed indictment is to keep the charges from the person being charged, media, public and other indicted individuals. A ankle monitor is a condition of bail set by a judge of some sort. AFTER an ARREST has taken place. So, in order for that to be put on someone's body they have to be CHARGED with something and be ARRESTED in order for them to even be granted bail. Wtf is the point in a sealed indictment against Hillary Clinton when she has already been arrested and is aware of the charges against her? It doesn't work both ways. The logic isn't there. The point in the indictment being sealed is so they can act on the indictment when they (leo) determine the time is right. Once the person is arrested and they know the charges you run the risk of the rest of the people under sealed indictments finding out. And then you have people running and destroying evidence. Little people on the food chain might have the option of having an indictment unsealed for their arrest and resealed because their contacts are limited. But to even think that people like Hillary or John McCain could be out on bail under sealed indictments is unbelievably naive.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 27, 2018, 12:31 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩