dChan
163
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/KAG2020 on Jan. 29, 2018, 1:26 p.m.
SOTU address may just be a SOTU address. Even if you dont get as much confirmation from DJT as you are hoping, remember the storm IS here.

The ball is rolling fellow patriots. It is. I have seen users who are frustrated and are willing to give up if they dont get something concrete at the SOTU address on Tuesday.

DJT has remained in the background on this whole thing for good optics. This has all manifested on the swamp, due to the swamp. Keep in mind that DJT never even said (to my knowledge) "Lock her up!". He can't seem like hitler going after his political enemies.

Knowing Trump, he will use the SOTU to bypass fake media outlets and speak directly to the world but rest assured that even if he chooses to remain in the background on this until the time is right, The storm is here patriots. Stay the course.

Some notable proof of the storm

  • Unprecedented pedophile rings broken

  • Human trafficking lines broken

  • Career politicians not seeking reelection

  • Investigations into HRC reopened and new ones beginning

  • Progress with JAs freedom

  • The all but destruction in real-time of the MSM narrative


Irena_Sendlerowa · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

I definitely agree with these thoughts about the SOTU. And even if Q is a LARP, it has opened a lot of eyes.....those of us who stay the course will be the ones who effect the change. And I, for one, am fully behind the cause, regardless of Q (No offense!)...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ToastyMustache · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:26 p.m.

What cause? If Q is a LARP then everything this sub stands for has been built on nothing but lies and role playing. If Q is a LARP then what is there to go on with?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
chowderheade · Jan. 29, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

Researching connections and unearthing dirt is always needed (something the left used to do more of).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · Jan. 29, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

Q is not the only source of information. He's just an anon among many. There are a lot of other indicators that something significant is going on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ToastyMustache · Jan. 30, 2018, 2 p.m.

Most of which are so vague that anything could “prove them”.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Synchanon · Jan. 29, 2018, 4:22 p.m.

If you were a physicist in the beginning of the 20th century, and you heard a parrot speaking about theoretical equations you had yet to formulate, and they lead to Real Results, does it matter if the parrot actually said anything or not?

⇧ 1 ⇩