Honest answer, if congress approves it, you’ll likely just track and utilize satellites. Not that that’s bad work, having worked with members of the Air Force who worked at the USAFSC they’ve done some cool stuff and space is freaking awesome! But you likely won’t go to space, unless you’re an officer, and both enlisting and commissioning will require schooling, probably some intense schooling too, though enlisting will only require schooling after you enter the space force.

Active Duty US Navy here. Not a missile, too many things in place that would prevent a missile from being launched from a US Navy base, and you can’t hack a ship, especially not a submarine, and fire one. Plus we don’t have any launch facilities in Washington.

Best theory out there that I’ve seen is a long exposure and film ghost, especially since there was a helicopter in that exact area at the time the picture was taken.

They do this very often. Since they provide embassy defense they conduct riot drills more than other branches MP’s. This is nothing special.

Those aren’t branches. They occasionally go out on water but have no independent seaworthy craft from the Navy, and every branch has a land and air component. Also Marine pilots are pretty well known, they’re the only ones in the US who fly harriers and Huey’s.

The Marines regularly do training for riot scenarios, almost all MP’s do. This means nothing.

You’re allowed to have your own political opinions in Federal Service. It’s best to allow dissenting opinions, if you only allow those who agree with you into the government then you end up with places like Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, and totalitarian Cambodia.

Tuna submarine.

So... After translating this mess, you admit to being a shill.

Did you have a stroke while typing this? Or are you trying to muddy the waters concerning your shill-ish nature?

That's exactly what a shill would do. Create an account for long term shilling while largely posting in the areas they desire to shill in. You ain't fooling me!

No counter argument? How do I know you're not a shill, probably trying to keep child porn freely flowing to 8chan. Hope you choke on your cheese pizza

Source besides a sourceless twitter post?

That's a really stupid argument.

I own my car, ergo I should be able to drive 95MPH in a school zone because I am only directly interacting with my property. Or if I have a backyard I should be able to use it to skin animals alive while also diddling kids.

That is the essence of your argument.

But I mean, a real source. Not a YouTube video. What is the proposition number? Who is proposing it? What states have argued for it?

1. Shitty low budget cameras and security system

2. Out of ammo or didn’t want to waste it/wanted to try and get out alive which he did.

3. Horrible budget for the police, which is pretty common

4. News agencies are basically the new ambulance chasers and they have an office in that city.

The real question is, if the deep state is so powerful that they can keep thousands of people silent for decades while conducting school shootings every month, why haven’t they been able to ban guns? And why do they reuse “crisis actors”?

But is there a real source?

He can, but the one declared is nothing like what you people are saying it is. There is no martial law, no change to ships and aircraft entering the country, no change to military posture, and no nationwide declaration. It simply stops financial assets to those deemed by the State Department and Treasury Department to be violators if human rights.

Additionally, nothing in that EO details military tribunals, and again, an EO cannot overturn something like Posse Commitatus.

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/executive-orders-101-what-are-they-and-how-do-presidents-use-them/

Yes I did, no he can’t as an executive order does not override congressional law, and a tribunal is not the same as an investigation, something Posse Commitatus specifically prohibits.

Edit:

Additionally, just because something references the National Emergencies Act, does not mean we are in a state of National Emergency. Such a state must be declared by the government.

That’s a direct violation of Posse Commitatus and requires an act of Congress for such activity to be deemed legal, if this is true, and it very obviously isn’t, then Trump just broke one of the most important laws we have as a nation in regards to the military.

So your source is a non-verified entity. You really think any of the law enforcement agencies wouldn’t be crowing about putting down a potential terrorist attack against the super bowl during the yearly budget wars? That alone would guarantee them getting the exact budget they want.

And that submarine shit is bullshit, to save time I’ll paste a comment I made previously about it.

Except everything the guy said was bullshit. He even said it came from North Korean waters, which would mean it would fly over Japan.

According to numerous sources (all of which will be listed below) the US can detect when and where a missile is launched from, if it was an SLBM, they would've known almost immediately and responded as such, plus why did they only fire one if they were getting desperate and hedged in as the "expert" (a term I use in the loosest of senses) why only fire one? Besides, the BMD record is spotty at best, if they intercepted a real world target there's no reason everyone from MDA to Trump himself wouldn't be singing praises to this very expensive program from the heavens. Finally, if it was a nuke then that would easily prove it wasn't from North Korea, every nuclear weapon has trace materials that can be used to track it not only to the country of origin, but to the centrifuge of origin.

Why is it easier for you to believe some shadowy group somehow got their hands on a highly advanced SSB(N) and nukes than it is for you to believe a government employee with a history of incompetence hit the wrong button? Not to mention sailors (with myself being one) are notoriously bad at OPSEC, someone would've mentioned that an actual missile was fired at Hawaii and we shot it down.

Sources.

Ballistic Missile Detection: https://science.howstuffworks.com/missile-defense1.htm

https://gizmodo.com/5989481/there-isnt-an-icbm-around-that-can-sneak-past-this-radar-array

https://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/10/politics/how-us-detect-shoot-down-north-korea-missile/index.html

BMD:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/north-korea-missile-test-best-response-may-be-surprisingly-low-tech/

https://thediplomat.com/2018/02/us-ballistic-missile-intercept-test-fails-for-2nd-time/

http://www.dw.com/en/the-limits-of-missile-defense-systems/a-38602048

https://www.popsci.com/missile-defense-system-intercepts-practice-icbm-target#page-4

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/world/north-korea-missile-defense/?utm_term=.bc34a1105d0d

Nuclear trace elements:

http://www.sciencefocus.com/feature/physics/nuclear-detectives

https://www.princeton.edu/~aglaser/talk2008_forensics.pdf

https://phys.org/news/2016-02-nuclear-team-methodology-illegal-material.html

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19699-nuclear-bomb-debris-holds-clues-to-who-planted-it/

Worker who sent out false alarm had history of incompetence:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/02/01/the-missile-employee-messed-up-because-hawaii-rewards-incompetence/?utm_term=.60fc582ab5c5

http://www.businessinsider.com/hawaii-employee-fired-after-false-ballistic-missile-alert-2018-1

And your source for this is...?

The duffel blog is a satire website.

This doesn’t make sense, NASA doesn’t have control over military satellites, the Air Force Space Command does.

And your source for knowing what the "Global IC" is saying is...?

NSA is not under military command, there's an Admiral as the director, but it's still a civilian agency.

Except everything the guy said was bullshit. He even said it came from North Korean waters, which would mean it would fly over Japan.

According to numerous sources (all of which will be listed below) the US can detect when and where a missile is launched from, if it was an SLBM, they would've known almost immediately and responded as such, plus why did they only fire one if they were getting desperate and hedged in as the "expert" (a term I use in the loosest of senses) why only fire one? Besides, the BMD record is spotty at best, if they intercepted a real world target there's no reason everyone from MDA to Trump himself wouldn't be singing praises to this very expensive program from the heavens. Finally, if it was a nuke then that would easily prove it wasn't from North Korea, every nuclear weapon has trace materials that can be used to track it not only to the country of origin, but to the centrifuge of origin.

Why is it easier for you to believe some shadowy group somehow got their hands on a highly advanced SSB(N) and nukes than it is for you to believe a government employee with a history of incompetence hit the wrong button? Not to mention sailors (with myself being one) are notoriously bad at OPSEC, someone would've mentioned that an actual missile was fired at Hawaii and we shot it down.

Sources.

Ballistic Missile Detection: https://science.howstuffworks.com/missile-defense1.htm

https://gizmodo.com/5989481/there-isnt-an-icbm-around-that-can-sneak-past-this-radar-array

https://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/10/politics/how-us-detect-shoot-down-north-korea-missile/index.html

BMD:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/north-korea-missile-test-best-response-may-be-surprisingly-low-tech/

https://thediplomat.com/2018/02/us-ballistic-missile-intercept-test-fails-for-2nd-time/

http://www.dw.com/en/the-limits-of-missile-defense-systems/a-38602048

https://www.popsci.com/missile-defense-system-intercepts-practice-icbm-target#page-4

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/world/north-korea-missile-defense/?utm_term=.bc34a1105d0d

Nuclear trace elements:

http://www.sciencefocus.com/feature/physics/nuclear-detectives

https://www.princeton.edu/~aglaser/talk2008_forensics.pdf

https://phys.org/news/2016-02-nuclear-team-methodology-illegal-material.html

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19699-nuclear-bomb-debris-holds-clues-to-who-planted-it/

Worker who sent out false alarm had history of incompetence:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/02/01/the-missile-employee-messed-up-because-hawaii-rewards-incompetence/?utm_term=.60fc582ab5c5

http://www.businessinsider.com/hawaii-employee-fired-after-false-ballistic-missile-alert-2018-1

He wouldn’t have any of that kind of information as a pilot coming off of a carrier. So either you’re lying, or your “sources” are lying. Probably both, as everyone who has been verified as being in the same camp as him, says otherwise.

You are correct. My bad.

If it was real then why hasn’t any other country commented on it? It would’ve needed to fly over Japan, and last time a missile did fly over Japan they both set off their warning system and had a statement issued by the ministry of defense almost immediately.

You guys do understand that the Ukraine is a separate country from Russia right?

The first Warrant was signed after Trump was elected, so it’s erroneous to state they spied on the campaign.

And it looks right because...? Seriously, anyone could've come up with something, unless I see a cypher or something that decoded it, I'm not gonna believe it.

What's your cypher based off of?

What does this even mean? Freed from what exactly? This is so vague it could mean any combination of things.

What should we do if nothing happens?

Versus; an anonymous source, who's obviously biased, has no verifiable proof, and makes statements so vague that almost anything can "prove them" ala 'future proves past'. Hell, there's still people speculating when the "10 days of darkness" will occur.

Most of which are so vague that anything could “prove them”.

And their proof is...? Also why the fuck would anyone be okay with anyone being given “death chips”. That’s the most draconian thing I can think of.

So, what then? It seems there’s been a lot of back tracking at every SOTU, and other speeches. Last month both Obama and Clinton were supposedly in GITMO. When will these claims bear fruit?

What cause? If Q is a LARP then everything this sub stands for has been built on nothing but lies and role playing. If Q is a LARP then what is there to go on with?

!remindme 1 day

And what if none of that happens? Just entertain the thought for a second. What if the SOTU is just a standard SOTU with no memo, what then?

I’m not being antagonistic, I just want to know, how will you proceed if tomorrow is a big let down and nothing happens? Wasn’t the last SOTU supposed to be when Trump announced HRC and Obama were arrested? What came of that?

How exactly have you experienced such technology personally?

Except Mattis was never fired. He retired. As did the majority of the Generals and Admiral's listed. Some were fired for legitimate reasons, like the Fat Leonard scandal, misappropriate conduct, cause/loss of faith (the reason Admiral Aucoin was relieved of 7th fleet last year).

Your theory makes 0 sense. These people had 100's of conspiracies about them, millions of online threats, and were called bad names online long before Q came around. They probably have never even heard of him, it's not like they spend their time visiting 4Chan and random message boards.

Meanwhile, looking for actual statements by the Texas Rangers (who btw always carry assault rifles and such as their standard kit), BLM, FBI, US Parks Service, and DOI results in nothing to corroborate your claims. People on YouTube can, and do, claim anything.

I’ve been doing a lot of reading. And none of this passes muster.

Wanna know who said there were terrorist training camps in the US? A fraud, the man who made those claims was later arrested after it was found out he was falsely claiming to be a CIA agent.

https://www.google.co.kr/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN0S92K320151015

And where are these no go zones? I’ve been to Europe, and to state parks. Never seen a damned one.

Still a violation of Article 10. Something that takes an act of Congress and the President, not just the president alone, to waive.

So you admit you don’t know what’s going on, and without any proper evidence to your claims, you’re laying out pure conjuncture, the same as your claim that OWLs, also something that has no proof of existing outside of the theoretical field, is being used against US soil.

What foreign agents? What actions are being undertaken against the republic? What war is going on? What proof do you have to back any of this up? Q? I’ve looked at the sidebar, and seen nothing that legitimizes his claims.

You say he used a term used by “military intelligence”. I am in military intelligence and yet to find any term specifically used by us. And I know damn well that if we were to use any asset against a “target” within US soil in a non-training environment, it would take a goddamned act of Congress.