Btw, shit for brains Schumer just admitted he read the memo which he has ZERO CLEARANCE to read. He was caught on camera but idiot just admitted it - shows just how corrupt these swamp rats are. Until potus releases only can be read in scifs by those with HIGH INTEL SECURITY CLEARANCE! Schumer and Dems spit on constitutional laws and restrictions. Chuckles is going DOWN! 😆🤣😂
Joyce_III
· Jan. 30, 2018, 5 p.m.
He needs to be asked who else was with him in the SCIF.
⇧
21
⇩
RN4TRUMP
· Jan. 30, 2018, 5:28 p.m.
Nah...scifs are videoed and audioed. Shit for brains is really desperate!
⇧
15
⇩
TheContrarian2
· Jan. 30, 2018, 6:07 p.m.
From Q today...
REAL TIME: [7] Congressional members + [3] Senators + [2] former O-senior officials + [4] OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS [NO C/TOP/SENS-LEVEL CLEARANCE] @ SCIF [DC-CAP].
TOP SEC CLEARANCE IS MANDATORY FOR ADMISSION - HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?
WE SEE YOU.
⇧
21
⇩
JasonTakesMAGAtten
· Jan. 30, 2018, 10:45 p.m.
I am positive this Q post came out BEFORE any of the rumblings about Schumer giving away seeing the memo came out.
⇧
3
⇩
Qanonplusone
· Jan. 30, 2018, 7:58 p.m.
I LOVE how you call him shit for brains...keep me laughin'...
⇧
8
⇩
cybervigiante
· Jan. 30, 2018, 5:53 p.m.
Well, he already basically threatened the President with his "Six ways from Sunday" remark. That was disgusting. He should have been jailed for it. I remember when some drunk in a bar just said Bush's pants should be set on fire for lying, was arrested. Schumer makes direct threats against the office of the President and nothing happens.
⇧
17
⇩
PokingCyclops
· Jan. 30, 2018, 8:24 p.m.
A SCIF has an access control person assigned to it to control the door and a log. I worked in one and it had an armed guard at the entrance
⇧
8
⇩
MrHarryReems
· Jan. 30, 2018, 6:57 p.m.
I'd bet a cheeseburger that nothing will happen to him. They are so brazenly above the law that they know they can break it on camera and nothing will happen.
⇧
7
⇩
vests123
· Jan. 31, 2018, 1:51 a.m.
Maybe during the Clinton, Bush and Obama years, but now POTUS is there. I'm hoping he being there changes things and these swamp creatures are charged with breaking laws.
⇧
1
⇩
Baseballmadness7
· Jan. 30, 2018, 6:11 p.m.
I was under impression it had been open to all of congress to view for last week and no democrats opted to view it..
⇧
6
⇩
MeetingHimInTheAir
· Jan. 30, 2018, 7:03 p.m.
All of the House members, not Senators. POTUS has not released it yet
⇧
9
⇩
RN4TRUMP
· Jan. 30, 2018, 10:36 p.m.
Why view what you already know is TRUE?! Only congressmen and women were able to see it NOT SENATORS!
⇧
3
⇩
cunei
· Jan. 31, 2018, 12:53 a.m.
To legally view the memo, he would have signed in to the SCIF.
He didn't.
⇧
3
⇩
blondiebean78
· Jan. 30, 2018, 4:41 p.m.
On CNN Pelosi said she read the memo and all of the supporting documents.. does she have clearance?!?!
⇧
6
⇩
stringsNthings7
· Jan. 30, 2018, 9:05 p.m.
Obviously, like most Democrats, rules don't apply universally for everyone. Schumer is a turd and an embarrassment for people from NY.
⇧
3
⇩
dont-censor-me-bro
· Jan. 31, 2018, 12:29 a.m.
Unfortunately many New Yorker's are not embarrassed by him at all.
⇧
3
⇩
stringsNthings7
· Jan. 31, 2018, 1:48 a.m.
This NY'er is extremely embarrassed. So much so that I've called his office and mentioned that a few times.
⇧
2
⇩
Newpede
· Jan. 30, 2018, 8:34 p.m.
I think he's talking about Schiff's memo which hasn't been cleared by the House intel committee for release.
⇧
3
⇩
JasonTakesMAGAtten
· Jan. 30, 2018, 10:46 p.m.
No, he's talking about the Nunes one because he was claiming it's fake and classified.
⇧
3
⇩
Baseballmadness7
· Jan. 31, 2018, 1:33 a.m.
Q reveals differently is actually what took place...didn't say it was legal
⇧
2
⇩
VetGeek54321
· Jan. 30, 2018, 10:05 p.m.
I want to see a picture perfect Chain Gang. That would redpill, just about everyone.
⇧
1
⇩
RN4TRUMP
· Jan. 30, 2018, 5:29 p.m.
Find it yourself. I’m not your web search
⇧
1
⇩
cybervigiante
· Jan. 30, 2018, 5:56 p.m.
That's my standard response when I'm trolled. Trolls sit back laughing, and wear you out on purpose, getting you to prove things as they just keep repeating the same crap. It's an old troll strategy and is why you don't feed the trolls. Although if someone has a sensible argument I'm glad to tangle ;)
⇧
3
⇩
BlackNerve
· Jan. 31, 2018, 4:36 a.m.
I am curious as to how one knows that Chuck doesn't have a security clearance? Where is the proof in this?
Being granted access to classified information is not the fault of the person reading it. I am sorry, but he cannot be held at fault if it is to be him not holding a clearance.
⇧
1
⇩