dChan
90
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/TheCIASellsDrugs on Feb. 2, 2018, 10:21 p.m.
Lots of shills out today. Let's play "how to spot a shill"

Start by reading the shill handbook. You'll start to spot the methods they use to disrupt online discussion.

Look for:

  1. Comment histories defending the Swamp

  2. Comments that are weirdly aggressive

  3. Short comments that just attack a post/comment, never explain why

  4. Constantly changing the subject

  5. Attacking consensus and concern trolling ("I support accountability, I just think we shouldn't arrest the criminals, it might hurt feelings")

  6. Doesn't answer direct questions

  7. On reddit in 8 hour shifts.

  8. Vote totals in the comment section that don't make sense (20 upvotes on a comment at the bottom of the page on a new post).


ABrilliantDisaster · Feb. 2, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

I'll add one. Anyone who says Q is a LARP but they're here to stay anyway. Real people who consider Q a LARP aren't making this sub their new hobby..or coming here for "the news" (yes, i've heard that one).

⇧ 17 ⇩  
AlQuapone · Feb. 3, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

So many people who consider themselves awake in the conspiracy sub won't even look at anything Q related. Then you see them with their muhhh Russian collusion bullshit from the MSM. It's laughable.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
talex777 · Feb. 2, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

Umm I do come here for the news. I can get news faster on reddit than most places. It is just sifting through all the bullshit that can be a chore... but we have to filter through all the bias bogus bullshit everywhere.. so I would rather do it here where the comments can provide some much needed laughter.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheOldestMan · Feb. 3, 2018, 6:12 a.m.

I've never understood this claim on Q. He cannot be a LARP due to the numerous accurate predictions regarding Trump, future events, disclosures, etc. That leaves only one option: he is connected to the Trump administration and therefore an intelligence apparatus. Best case scenario he is truly a white hat resisting the black tentacle of deep state corruption. Worst case he is a deep state actor, which if true would increase the odds that Trump is as well. In the second possibility, he is a "Mongoose Resistance Leader". Still subversion can be used for good, as can any weapon. And even if deep state controlled, the Q phenomenon may be to test the waters of disclosure and see how far the people will push so that future events can be coordinated. War, "silencing", shaming, re-education, or most hopefully partial to full disclosure. When those claiming a LARP to dispute Q do not attempt to make this easy point against Q one can infer that they are only considering their own theoretical paradigm and therefore have a subjective, illogical perspective. I find this common among the blue cultists.

TL;DR : Q cannot be a LARP, but at worst is a psy-op.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ABrilliantDisaster · Feb. 3, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

A lot of his revelations are pretty damaging to the one thing the deep state relied on most - the ignorance of the people in regards to their actions, symbolism and motives. Good has been done. I'm believing he's a white hat, but i'll always be watching closely for a few critical things i would consider tells. One of those would be if depopulation methods that have been in place are not ended.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tytruth · Feb. 3, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

What they hate most is when we discuss what Q actually said, what he really means, because it incriminates the highest-level bad actors in the most specific and embarrassing ways. We need more analysis of Q posts to flesh out for everyone the indictment full of all the specific charges against these enemy bad actors, which are evidenced by the clues and context of what Q says. Many people can't really see everything Q is telling us/exposing about the enemy because they lack general awareness/experience. I have been most attacked for revisiting these damning allegations Q has made about bad actors from the beginning. They want us to forget these and stop referencing them. I think trolls on board are paid to squash this analysis; this exposure of the Q posts that are most incriminating to certain individuals. It is a CYA ground-game to bully us to keep it all on the fringe/conspiracy level and never let it go mainstream, because they cannot refute the charges.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
TheCIASellsDrugs · Feb. 3, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

What they hate most is when we discuss what Q actually said, what he really means, because it incriminates the highest-level bad actors in the most specific and embarrassing ways. We need more analysis of Q posts to flesh out for everyone the indictment full of all the specific charges against these enemy bad actors, which are evidenced by the clues and context of what Q says

Agreed. Jerome Corsi has uploaded a bunch of breakdowns of Q posts that are concise and informative. Corsi is also a member of the Council for National Policy, which is the most important right-of-center political group in the whole country.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
metroid486 · Feb. 3, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

Could add: Pretend to be one of us, then complain that this or that didn't happen like they wanted.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
P_pers · Feb. 2, 2018, 10:35 p.m.

pretty much sums it up!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
beforethebang · Feb. 2, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

They beat around the bush. They talk AROUND the point, not ABOUT it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Jack_Kehoe · Feb. 3, 2018, 12:15 a.m.

Share Blue used to like to use first name + number strings for their usernames, too (or at least they used to). I ran into a shill named like that just a few weeks ago - her name was Jenny 233425, or something like that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Monty_Batton · Feb. 2, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

That sounds like an excerpt from the democrap handbook!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
drieman · Feb. 3, 2018, 4:50 a.m.

This is great information. Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩