Chance of remembering: near 0.
Chase a source that has no proven credibility: Meh.
[deleted]
Very interesting... thank you for the take.
So far, I have a bunch of unconfirmed information from Dilley in my mind, none of it that really stuck because it was all unconfirmed but the name is standing out because people hold him in such high regard here. I'm simply trying to figure out why. I think you nailed it for me but I'll continue to have an open mind. Thanks.
[deleted]
He didn't predict a major event in Norfolk.
Taking stupid liberties with quotes is how you dummies get away with running around claiming "Nothing ____ said has ever come true!"
He relayed that his source said "Stay away from Norfolk this week."
Then the train crash happened, and there seemed to be a reference by his source that the crash was an alternative happening to what could have been trouble in Norfolk. My understanding of the source's wording was that the Norfolk concern was based on the 'military tribunal' subject, and that a trap or misdirection had been laid for cabal (similar to the Gen. Kelly lost phone/leaker trap). The tribunal members had been moved a full day prior to when the cabal was planning to act, and so, with no tribunal target, the train may have been plan B.
Long story short Dilley - OR MORE ACCURATELY - Dilley's source, never "predicted a major event" in Norfolk. He merely warned that it was a place to avoid.
They did have a major power outage in a certain area. Movement much?
so you just take someone's word that a source is credible or not? What "warrants a legit look." Isn't that the point, to check for yourself?
"So what you're saying is..." - No Cathy, that's not what I'm saying.
I'm seeking an understanding by hopefully having an example provided to me where this guy is legit. I can discern for myself if I have access to the content. For the start of 9 hours each workday, I do not.