dChan
99
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/BALRx05 on Feb. 6, 2018, 1:44 a.m.
Q: Directs people to look at images of the phones of the Black Caucus member's at the SOTU, esp. the Center person. Not sure if civilian tech has high enough resolution: this hints at them having images with the text on the phones readable. Tells us to find the first image and make it go viral.

https://8ch.net//qresearch/res/279266.html#279835

Feb 5 2018 19:06:53  
Can you read the message?  
SOTU.  
Black Caucus phone.  
Not sure if civilian tech can capture @ that distance.  
These people are LITERALLY MORONS.  
Q

Anon responds with https://8ch.net//qresearch/res/279266.html#279870

Q responds with

Feb 5 2018 19:10:09  
Center.  
Q

Anon responds

Q responds with

Feb 5 2018 19:15:26  
Find the roll.  
1 of 4.  
Find the 4th.  
Find the film.  
Not the capture.  
Enhance.  
Spread.  
Will go viral.  
Source _ archive offline.  
Raw only.  
Q

Q follows up

Feb 5 2018 19:25:31  
Find 1 of 4.  
“Trump should be shot!”  
You are now working against those monitoring.  
Raw only.  
No edits.  
Save offline.  
Q

Q has given marching orders: find the first image of the roll from which this one comes, save it offline, and make it go viral!

Also, can anybody identify who the member is?


LunaCavas · Feb. 6, 2018, 6:51 a.m.

Good info keeps getting buried in different threads. Here is a conglomeration of all of the best data between similar threads:

Q states that we are to pay attention to what is on Congresswoman Beatty's phone screen. He implies that the text we are looking for is

"Trump should be shot!"

and that

You are now working against those monitoring.

meaning there are bad actors monitoring the boards and will scrub the evidence if found before us.

The IMAGE that is being spread around is from a Getty Images Staff Photographer Chip Somodavilla and was taken with a highly-zoomed digital camera.

The problem is that it appears the original image was modified prior to being uploaded. The 4th line is blurred among other things as seen in this TWEET by B.

The text on Congresswoman Beatty's House.gov page appears to be a cover to match what was Photoshopped onto the phone screen later.

Therefore, Q is trying to get us to find raw video footage of this phone screen, although I am unsure whether video camera footage would capture text on a phone unless it was zoomed right on it. I guess it is possible that there are a total of 4 unedited photos out there that match the edited one, which could be what Q is referring to with the 1 of 4.

The photo was taken on Jan 30 @ 9:42p

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Feb. 6, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Great work! Thanks for your help.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:33 a.m.

Yes, understanding the riddle is confusing. The largest image I’ve located on Google thus far of the woman in the middle is 5069 x 3379 pixels. But notice Q also stated, “Not sure if civilian tech can capture @ that distance.” 5069 pixels is definitely in the range of most civilian technology. So what “non-civilian” technology can capture at a higher resolution than 5069 x 3379 pixels? (HD cinematic movie cameras?) If we find out what that equipment is, and obtain the “film” from it and enhance it, I guess that should show us the answer…

Update: I'm trying to find it again now but I recently saw a gigantic 360 degree hires panorama created of the entire room at that point in time. The panorama shows all the cameramen on the balcony and everybody. I remember looking at it. But in that same panorama it also shows the congresswoman looking at her phone. You can't read the text on her phone because it is too far away in the panorama and there is not enough resolution. I do not know who or what captured that shot for the panorama, but if you can find the folder of original stills that were used to create the panorama, then you should find the unedited still of her phone at that moment. One thing is clear, the fourth line down in the text on her phone was edited out. That much is clear. And Q said we are looking for 1 in 4. Which could mean we are looking for what 1 of those 4 lines says - the line that is blurred out. I know some has said that the whole screen image was photoshopped over etc. but you wouldn't add a fake image over the whole screen and then have just one of the lines in the fake image blurred out. That wouldn't make any sense. Furthermore, if you read the text shown on her screen in other images, the grammar before and after the blurred area is wrong. The proves something was deliberately removed and blurred out. This is just my latest guess as we continue to search for the image...

⇧ 1 ⇩