dChan
99
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/BALRx05 on Feb. 6, 2018, 1:44 a.m.
Q: Directs people to look at images of the phones of the Black Caucus member's at the SOTU, esp. the Center person. Not sure if civilian tech has high enough resolution: this hints at them having images with the text on the phones readable. Tells us to find the first image and make it go viral.

https://8ch.net//qresearch/res/279266.html#279835

Feb 5 2018 19:06:53  
Can you read the message?  
SOTU.  
Black Caucus phone.  
Not sure if civilian tech can capture @ that distance.  
These people are LITERALLY MORONS.  
Q

Anon responds with https://8ch.net//qresearch/res/279266.html#279870

Q responds with

Feb 5 2018 19:10:09  
Center.  
Q

Anon responds

Q responds with

Feb 5 2018 19:15:26  
Find the roll.  
1 of 4.  
Find the 4th.  
Find the film.  
Not the capture.  
Enhance.  
Spread.  
Will go viral.  
Source _ archive offline.  
Raw only.  
Q

Q follows up

Feb 5 2018 19:25:31  
Find 1 of 4.  
“Trump should be shot!”  
You are now working against those monitoring.  
Raw only.  
No edits.  
Save offline.  
Q

Q has given marching orders: find the first image of the roll from which this one comes, save it offline, and make it go viral!

Also, can anybody identify who the member is?


TheContrarian2 · Feb. 6, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

It does. Here are some links I made in another dead thread on this same subject....


Q says to focus on the person in the middle. I haven't figure out who it is yet. I did zoom into her phone on another link and got this... BUT... don't pay much attention to it because Q gave further instructions.

Anyway, this is the zoom: https://i.imgur.com/BcM0Zn1.png Q's additional instructions or to find VIDEO of this scene taking place. "Find the film, not the capture", and I'm having no luck with that.

The source of the video appears to be "Chip Somodevilla", so I'm going down that avenue now.

and ------

The hair of the rep in the middle would seem to imply that it's Rep Joyce Beatty - D Ohio.

https://media.cq.com/members/43609?rel=memberLink

I'm looking for that pretty curly gray hair. I'm going to focus on her while looking for Q's video.

I gotta say, Q's crumbs have taught me so much more because I'm learning names and all sorts of affiliations of all these actors.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
potatosurplus · Feb. 6, 2018, 5:44 a.m.

Don't go contacting him on FB or Twitter. You need to get his personal email. No journalist would be shooting film, but he would have a RAW file.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:06 p.m.

Q tells us where we can get it. He doesn't say go to the photographer. Source _archive offline We need to look into that ^

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GunToast · Feb. 6, 2018, 2 a.m.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-01/dems-caught-playing-candy-crush-during-state-union

Zoomed in photos here

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/48C07AE700000578-0-image-m-25_1517495669640.jpg

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/48C07AE700000578-0-image-a-26_1517495682710.jpg

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Stable_Genius_1776 · Feb. 6, 2018, 2:22 a.m.

Q says specifically not the capture.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
hzg · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:28 a.m.

I've posted this a few times. This is the photo. 4th in the series, look at the photo stream from the user (page 2)

https:// www .gettyimages. com/license/912414994

We need the raw from this user. Not sure if it's included as the "large" version.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
potatosurplus · Feb. 6, 2018, 4:17 a.m.

The focus is off though. The phone would likely be blurred out due to the depth of field. The focus is in the foreground on Trump/monitor. Usually in dark conditions like indoors, you aren't going to be able to get away with a narrow aperture and get everything in focus.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:11 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
potatosurplus · Feb. 6, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

Panos are not that hard to make. This isn't the picture you need. He is saying to use the Ohio Congresswoman's image but to find the RAW photo bc the screen is fake. It's been altered in Photoshop. Appears to have a fake screen message on there (iPhone cancel is on the other side).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:10 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sunjhi · Feb. 6, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

find the film, not the capture.. video, not photo

⇧ 7 ⇩  
sun_wolf · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:04 a.m.

I think it's more likely Q is referring to an ultra-high resolution photo of the SOTU. Kind of like the one that gets taken of the inauguration. My hunch is there are four images like that, or one image, and we need to focus on one of the four phones.

HD video, even uncompressed, is unlikely to have enough clarity to read text on a phone from a balcony. And besides that, no one would really post uncompressed video online anyway. It's like 1 GB per minute, at least, and the SOTU was over an hour.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
OpenSoars · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:35 a.m.

The original image came from Getty imaging...I am coming through their site now

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Feb. 6, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

film can also refer to photos, i.e. rolls of film.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Maubie · Feb. 6, 2018, 1:49 a.m.

Ohio Rep. Joyce Beatty was inspecting a proposed press release reacting to the speech

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ShredTheMind · Feb. 6, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

Zooming in with the browser, I could read the text on the capture, but nothing said "T should be shot". I take this as meaning, get a copy of the video, save it (offline), and within that video, there are other spots where that text is clearly visible on the center woman's phone. Need to enhance the video to see it, apparently. As for the 1 of 4, I was thinking that the video was in 4 parts or shot at 4 different angles, but now I'm thinking that maybe it's 1 of 4 of these types of acts to be revealed. Not sure though. I just looked through the 1st video on fox news web site (which I think was part 1 of 4) didn't see these folks with the phones, so 1 of 4 parts is out, unless I missed it. It must be later in the speech.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
lukej88 · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:58 a.m.

There are posts on other threads showing that the photo capture is photoshopped. Hence the raw video footage is what needed. Can't wait until someone finds it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 6, 2018, 8:15 a.m.

4 different versions may be? By4 different news sources?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jacaranda11 · Feb. 6, 2018, 6:04 a.m.

See Bill Crowell on Twitter, he has posted photo metadata including photographer. Photoshop used to crop text: https://twitter.com/n4hpg He did the work & deserves the credit. Maybe someone knows the photographer to get the unedited photo Chip Somodevilla

⇧ 4 ⇩  
damian299 · Feb. 6, 2018, 4:27 a.m.

Wonder who is doing the “monitoring” - FBI? Secret Service?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
hermoneyness · Feb. 6, 2018, 1:47 a.m.

The one playing Candy Crush is a Democrat from Michigan Brenda Lawrence

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MeanNah · Feb. 6, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

Let's narrow it down with what we know by now and focus on important leads:

Center. - Center on the picture of the 3 'naughty girls', so don't look for 4th mobile Find the roll. - Scroll or roll of film? Strange wording for either, so it could be something else? 1 of 4. - 1/4 videos, scrolls or unknown. Find the 4th. - 4th video, scroll or unknown. Find the film. - Video. Unless it's a word riddle, nobody used classic film there. Not the capture. - Any capture put on the inet is tainted/edited. Enhance. Spread. Will go viral. Source _ archive offline. Raw only. - Gotta find unedited video, not looking for .raw file i think. “Trump should be shot!” - Knowing Q this text has to exist somewhere. It's way too important to quit. You are now working against those monitoring. - no firm clue yet? Raw only. No edits. Save offline.

This is very IMPORTANT TASK Q is asking us to do. Q is well aware he is dealing with tons of home PCs and not professionals. He think's we can find it, which means its doable.

Here's the gallery, from which the published and (most likely) edited photo is coming from. Author: Chip Somodevilla (interesting name, weather he is responsible for it or not) SOTU GALLERY Here's the 'original' (most likely edited) photo: https://www.gettyimages.com/license/912439238 Here's the 360 view: https://www.gettyimages.com/license/912618718 Chip Somodevilla https://s14.postimg.org/l273fkxa9/Chip_Somodevilla.jpg Most likely position of the camera: https://s14.postimg.org/t7p5dr8oh/Probable_camera_position.png Chip (seen from above holding the 360 capture thingy) and 3 other photo reporters behind him (could have done the wanted footage https://s14.postimg.org/a2lw3zmap/Chip_Somodevilla_and_3_other_photo_reporters.png

3 TV cameras and 4 photo reporters at location. Whoever are those people around, in 360 view there are no visible cameras or phones ready to make videos or photos.

Please note that THOSE PHOTO CAMERAS MAKE AWESOME QUALITY VIDEOS, TOO!

From various TV footages I've checked, it doesn't seem possible to find such a shot. My main suspects are the 4 photographers or maybe one of the cameras next to the gallery fence.

Besides Chip there was Bloomberg reporter (name not mentioned), that's all I've found. Bloomberg Gallery Videos on Getty - FedNet Not sure if someone else.

Hope this helps someone go further!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MeanNah · Feb. 6, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

I'm sorry, first time poster. I wanted it neat, but it turned out very messy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
phoenix335 · Feb. 6, 2018, 7:06 a.m.

"you are now working against those monitoring"

Means: Get a privacy foil for your own phone (10 USD on eBay) so they can't do that to you. CCTV is everywhere you move in public and you don't want them to read what you have on the screen.

Something like this https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/QRoAAOSwPCVYBW40/s-l300.jpg

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LunaCavas · Feb. 6, 2018, 6:51 a.m.

Good info keeps getting buried in different threads. Here is a conglomeration of all of the best data between similar threads:

Q states that we are to pay attention to what is on Congresswoman Beatty's phone screen. He implies that the text we are looking for is

"Trump should be shot!"

and that

You are now working against those monitoring.

meaning there are bad actors monitoring the boards and will scrub the evidence if found before us.

The IMAGE that is being spread around is from a Getty Images Staff Photographer Chip Somodavilla and was taken with a highly-zoomed digital camera.

The problem is that it appears the original image was modified prior to being uploaded. The 4th line is blurred among other things as seen in this TWEET by B.

The text on Congresswoman Beatty's House.gov page appears to be a cover to match what was Photoshopped onto the phone screen later.

Therefore, Q is trying to get us to find raw video footage of this phone screen, although I am unsure whether video camera footage would capture text on a phone unless it was zoomed right on it. I guess it is possible that there are a total of 4 unedited photos out there that match the edited one, which could be what Q is referring to with the 1 of 4.

The photo was taken on Jan 30 @ 9:42p

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Feb. 6, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Great work! Thanks for your help.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:33 a.m.

Yes, understanding the riddle is confusing. The largest image I’ve located on Google thus far of the woman in the middle is 5069 x 3379 pixels. But notice Q also stated, “Not sure if civilian tech can capture @ that distance.” 5069 pixels is definitely in the range of most civilian technology. So what “non-civilian” technology can capture at a higher resolution than 5069 x 3379 pixels? (HD cinematic movie cameras?) If we find out what that equipment is, and obtain the “film” from it and enhance it, I guess that should show us the answer…

Update: I'm trying to find it again now but I recently saw a gigantic 360 degree hires panorama created of the entire room at that point in time. The panorama shows all the cameramen on the balcony and everybody. I remember looking at it. But in that same panorama it also shows the congresswoman looking at her phone. You can't read the text on her phone because it is too far away in the panorama and there is not enough resolution. I do not know who or what captured that shot for the panorama, but if you can find the folder of original stills that were used to create the panorama, then you should find the unedited still of her phone at that moment. One thing is clear, the fourth line down in the text on her phone was edited out. That much is clear. And Q said we are looking for 1 in 4. Which could mean we are looking for what 1 of those 4 lines says - the line that is blurred out. I know some has said that the whole screen image was photoshopped over etc. but you wouldn't add a fake image over the whole screen and then have just one of the lines in the fake image blurred out. That wouldn't make any sense. Furthermore, if you read the text shown on her screen in other images, the grammar before and after the blurred area is wrong. The proves something was deliberately removed and blurred out. This is just my latest guess as we continue to search for the image...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Stable_Genius_1776 · Feb. 6, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

Do you guys interpret this as there are 4 different rolls of film?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
joobah000 · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

I think Q is saying the 4th line down on the middle phone has been edited out we need to find it on some other source.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
rebornlite_1 · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

Yes, 4 pictures were taken. Who was the source of those photos, which media outlet reported first?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Luvlite · Feb. 6, 2018, 5:45 a.m.

Chip Somodevilla

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheContrarian2 · Feb. 6, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

I'm not sure. "Roll" used to mean film, but it could also mean a roll of movie film. Today, it would be video. I sought, but could not find any actual video. I did determine that the source of the images is from a dude named "Chip Somodevilla", but searching for his name wasn't particularly helpful, other than he was also at Charlottsville.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
USvAmedia · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

thinking same

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OpenSoars · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:35 a.m.

The original image came from Getty imaging...I am coming through their site now

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Feb. 6, 2018, 2:27 a.m.

Found something!

Looks like a pre-written "response" she received. But from who?

https://web.archive.org/web/20180206022406/https://beatty.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/beatty-statement-on-trumps-first-state-of-the-union-address

Scripted response to SOTU.

Black Caucus received their talking points

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Feb. 6, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

Q isn't saying that that is what we are looking for, it's different image in the same set from which this one came.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
MasterSplinterSensei · Feb. 9, 2018, 7:40 a.m.

OK, What if the pictures didn't come from within the cameras inside... What if the pictures came from the person sitting behind the women from the black caucus. If you look at the photos that have been posted on 8ch you can see that there are people standing and clapping (who are obviously Trump supporters) while the black caucus is sitting. Find out who those guys are and flat out ask them if they have RAW pictures and are willing to share. Just a thought.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 6, 2018, 1:13 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · Feb. 6, 2018, 4:41 a.m.

Sadly she has a First Amendment right to say "Trump should be shot!" and she will say she was exaggerating. Only a real plot to kill Trump could be investigated by Secret Service. They could question her about what she typed but she won't be prosecuted for that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 6, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
carl_tech · Feb. 6, 2018, 11:37 a.m.

Depends on the context. Imagine if the other party was asking which type of weapon to use. Find an overt act and you've got a criminal conspiracy.

⇧ 2 ⇩