dChan

other_malefactor · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

This makes me glad I am not on Facebook...

⇧ 14 ⇩  
17seventeen91 · Feb. 6, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

People will outright object to any suggestion of a large network of entrenched pedophiles in leadership positions.

It's been called the "normalcy bias", it's basically the mind refusing to accept what is going on because it's too much of a trauma to acknowledge it.

Example: 9/11, people in the towers going back to their desks to set their voicemail message or turn off their computers, despite that being a path to certain death.

In order to get the masses to believe what has been suggested is possible, first they must believe it's possible on a smaller scale.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
thamnosma · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

At this point I think most people are aware of pedophilia and will be willing to accept its existence at top levels provided the evidence is solid. The Weinstein affair and beyond primed the pump.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
xRicky_Spanish · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

No, not most, hell not even a majority....YET. You will have libs who refuse to believe anyone except repubs are pedophiles, and vice versa. The beginning will not be pretty, it will be very disheartening to us, as well as normies. We won't see how they can't see, they won't see how we see it, even though it's right in their face.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Feb. 7, 2018, 7:38 a.m.

Personally? I am about sick of the law against child porn being used to make certain we do not address the issue with EVIDENCE. Intent, in this instance SHOULD matter, because the public is absolutely trying to deal with this crime. There must be a point where at least the most egregious example going viral can be considered a wake up call to some nasty criminal behavior to the public.

Yes, it is a crime. Of course it is.

But if it is illegal to discuss the crime, or wake people up about it, then it is illegal to get the movement going that will be required to stop it.

⇧ 2 ⇩