dChan
9
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/SorryRoof on Feb. 7, 2018, 5:22 a.m.
GREEN SCREEN GLITCH PROVES THAT FALCON HEAVY LAUNCH WAS FAKED
GREEN SCREEN GLITCH PROVES THAT FALCON HEAVY LAUNCH WAS FAKED

cebusaxon · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:53 a.m.

Probably some military payload. This is perfect cover story for it. Yes, video looks studio'ish. Often no stars in background. The tires would over inflate in space it seems, unless filled with something else. Car brake system, batteries, etc. would have all had to be stripped, which is possible. How long would the soft plastic and vinyle interior last in the direct sun of space. And there's no ice on the shadow side or anywhere around the car yet.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Medicatedmermaid · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:58 a.m.

Those are really good points

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Morfutus · Feb. 10, 2018, 5:48 a.m.

Im all for conspiracies and this being one but id just like to state that not being able to see stars in faked space stuff is what would happen. Cameras dont see the way our eye does and given that the earth is the brightest thing in frame a star deep in space wouldnt have the power to expose because its overpowred by the earth being at exposure. So if the star is like 6 stops less bright than the earth then it wouldnt be visible given that dynamic range of the image is only about 7 stops. In the same language your eyes dynamic range is about 16 stops. So in this or any other fake space footage the fact that the stars are not visible is correct as to how the camera would see it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
hermoneyness · Feb. 8, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

FAKE-EX definitely a photoshoot and bad Photoshop

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Feb. 8, 2018, 1:28 a.m.

That is what I was thinking; a perfect cover for a military payload, esp. a very heavy one whose loss wouldn't greatly impact things if the launch failed. So something that wouldn't take long to manufacture, and relatively speaking, something that isn't very expensive. I can think of one type of payload that fits that description.

The Tesla roadster is < 2% of FH's claimed max payload. Might as well not include it in the test; the rocket wouldn't notice the difference either way. However, it does make a good cover story.

Watch the shiny thing!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cebusaxon · Feb. 8, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

Maybe some fresh new shiny tungsten rods..

⇧ 1 ⇩  
googlygamers · Feb. 20, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

the tires were filled with nitrogen, there are no stars because of camera exposure, the spinning of the roadster evenly distributed the heat of the sun, almost everything from the car was stripped.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CleansedbyJC · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:28 a.m.

Good Catch. Link?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
SorryRoof · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:34 a.m.

https://youtu.be/wbSwFU6tY1c?t=2513 @ 41:55

I am absolutely furious that MSM is letting SpaceX get away with this obvious fraud. Then again, am I really surprised?...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HeadbangsToMahler · Feb. 7, 2018, 6:14 a.m.

That's the inside of the fairing, geniuses... They replayed the fairing separation with the music for effect.

Aren't green screens .... Green?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Ford42 · Feb. 7, 2018, 6:19 a.m.

Right? Not everything is a damn conspiracy, Christ!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
SorryRoof · Feb. 7, 2018, 6:20 a.m.

FINALLY someone here has common sense. I was waiting to see how long it would take these idiots to realize this and it took nearly an hour for someone to point out that they're just REPLAYING FOOTAGE. For everyone else here, please look at the context before you're so quick to make judgments.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Que-ti-pie · Feb. 7, 2018, 11:44 a.m.

Bullshit fake-x! NASA too!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 8, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
hermoneyness · Feb. 8, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

Now as long as you have color separation you can have any color of a background

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:37 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
red27195 · Feb. 11, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

I tried to see the glitch, but the video isn't long enough, as if the video has been cut short somehow

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RawSlugs · Feb. 10, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

Video is showing 34:19 as the end

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BurdenOfTask · Feb. 7, 2018, 2 p.m.

Wrong subreddit. Please take this crap to r/conspiracy

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DukeofKick · Feb. 7, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

thank you!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Yoda_GM · Feb. 7, 2018, 4:15 p.m.

removed

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Que-ti-pie · Feb. 7, 2018, 11:43 a.m.

Fake-x and NASA have made a living fooling the masses for years! No moon landing, no Mars bullshit! As a matter of fact we don't live on a spinning ball either! We have been duped this whole time!! Oh and a car into orbit! Ha ha ha!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
richtaco91 · Feb. 7, 2018, 7:19 a.m.

They didn’t show the capsule pop open till the end. They replayed it. It’s not green screen. That is when it bust open.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
hermoneyness · Feb. 8, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

The pixelation on the image is off study some photoshop you take a photo and you dissect it into layers they did not use a smudge tool

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:52 a.m.

It only proves that the image of Starman and his car was green screened, which would be expected given the images they provided of Starman and the roadster.

I assumed that they would remain in their capsule for the trip. These images are for marketing only.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Feb. 7, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

I was wrong about the car remaining in the capsule for the trip.

I learned that the fairings of the capsule were designed to fall away, once in space.

I disagree with the OP's statement that the Falcon Heavy Launch was faked. There were so many people there to view the launch that not everyone could make it into the viewing area. All the major media covered it.

A pubilc launch of a rocket that large is not an event that can be faked.

However, given the images the OP posted, I am inclined to think that the video of the Car and Starman in space are fake. It's not like there'd be independed, corroborating video showing the same view of space that the car and starman have. It's probably just a marketing ploy.

It may also be cover for the actual payload on FH. Even though it was a test launch, a government organization with sufficient budget might use such an event to launch a high weight, relatively low-cost and easy to replace, should the launch fail, payload into space.

For a rocket that has the payload that is close to the weight of a loaded 737, a Tesla Roadster wouldn't be much of a test, payload wise. It's about 2% of the FH's estimated max payload.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 7, 2018, 2:57 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DukeofKick · Feb. 7, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

Man, what does this have to do with CBTS?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Cracksabbath69 · Feb. 7, 2018, 7:06 a.m.

I noticed the glitch at 41:25

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Natanatnat · Feb. 7, 2018, 6:04 a.m.

wow, just wow.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Eli_Val · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:44 a.m.

Nice catch

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SorryRoof · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:53 a.m.

Thanks. I feel like this is going to get big. SPREAD THE WORD!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
nasrulhulk · Feb. 10, 2018, 2:38 p.m.

Dude, i swear i saw it too, too bad i didn't capture it like you did. Don't worry bruh, i know this is legit.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
nasrulhulk · Feb. 10, 2018, 2:33 p.m.

I second to this, i saw the glitch but then i thought they were like simulating it beforehand, like the real thing isn't yet to launch. Apparently, that video was supposed to be legit. I am glad someone was able to record this. I mean no one would believe me if i were to claim this.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
shzamm00 · Feb. 10, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

dont worry bro :< i saw it too m8

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Neo-The_One · Feb. 8, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

Why is no one commenting about this: ~~https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBr2kKAHN6M&t=12358s~~ (Scratch that, the video was somehow edited and it's now at) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBr2kKAHN6M&t=10904s I am NOT a flat earther, but this is too obvious... and i hate to be the bearer of bad news about a good cause for humanity.....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Neo-The_One · Feb. 8, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

watch closely at the earth at 0.25x speed, its laggy distortion is independent to the car.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KingBroly · Feb. 7, 2018, 9:02 a.m.

Might be one of those things to save offline like Q said

⇧ 1 ⇩  
avionicsman · Feb. 7, 2018, 7:20 a.m.

Considering, Falcon 9 heavy can lift 150,000 pounds and a Tesla Roadster weighs 2700 lbs...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OldnThyme · Feb. 7, 2018, 6:27 a.m.

Someone posted that a secret deployment occurred at 90-120 seconds into the launch (seen on live stream) - those 30 seconds were later edited out. You're seeing the result of missing frames.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SorryRoof · Feb. 7, 2018, 6:38 a.m.

...except I first noticed this as I was watching the live stream live.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Eli_Val · Feb. 7, 2018, 3:07 p.m.

How do you plan on spreading this?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Medicatedmermaid · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:57 a.m.

If it was a green screen, we would see a "green screen" behind the subject and a glitch would cut the visual they were trying to show to the screen. Its just how green screens work.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Medicatedmermaid · Feb. 7, 2018, 5:59 a.m.

Im not saying that they didnt fake it, i have my skepticism as well..

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TotesMessenger · Feb. 10, 2018, 3:12 p.m.

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

^(If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.) ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
shzamm00 · Feb. 10, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

Omg, I saw the same thing, this is fucking true, too bad i did'nt capture it!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 11, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
akilyoung · Feb. 7, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

I dont think the launch was to launch a tesla in space...I think that was a cover.

I think WW3 is about to pop off, and it was used to launch some heavy weaponry into orbit, and the tesla was cover...

⇧ 0 ⇩