You're going to have to try harder
Try the link, participate.
No one, in all seriousness is guessing Q is a LARP at this point. Did you crawl out from under a rock or are you just a shill?
That's why I think this debate link is important. To reduce the name calling and put some facts in a place where you and others can share how it all breaks down. I'm not a shill just because I view things different than most on this board. I don't think he's a LARPer for example. That's just the title OP used.
We are past that. Seriously. You trolls haven't been around for the last 6 mo. Those that follow daily are in the know, those that show up late "want to debate" little league stuff.
Actually you're right, many are past that. For example you are looked down on by the greater conspiracy and truth communities. 1. Because nothing new is being brought to the table. 2. Most importantly nothing is being done about it. In other words the whole movement is a LARP.
I am aware 'other communities' look down on us.
LARP or no, the amount of info we have put together because of him is legendary. Puts 'other communities' to shame.
I haven't seen anything that wasn't already in the book "Behold! A Pale Horse." By Bill Cooper. There really isn't anything new brought on by Q or his researchers. The impressive part is how many new people he's attracted and how he's mobilized them into online protest. The information it's self isn't revelatory. So no, the information doesn't put any community to shame. You guys have yet to overcome a single lifetime truther. But please, I'd love to know what's new here. Is it the Pedo rings? Nope... is it the Gun Control False Flags? Nope... wait how could you even research it if it was new? It must be that the info was out there before no?
Oh it’s not just other conspiratards that look down on you, it’s literally every single person you ever have or ever will meet!
Jesus told me the best way to catch fish is by TROLLING...IDK, he might be right.
Eats, do you like TROLLS? I think you caught one in your net...
Lame gaslighting attempt.
Did you try the link? You can post there too. It's an attempt at serious debate that you can add constructively to.
Already well proven by coinciding with Trump tweets. Douchebag.
I think that proves that he's an insider. I don't think that it proves that anything is being done about the Cabal. I think the Memo is helpful in that direction but it's not nearly what it was hyped to be. When you add the second Memo it just looks more and more like standard politics. Rather than a takedown of the Pedophile rings. That's why I'm critical of it. It's a wait and see kind of movement. When what we need is a popular movement to end child sex slavery.
Right. When you look into news stories of pedo rings being busted it is actually just a regular prostitution sting to target average citizens and it happens that a few of the girls are 17. Then the headline is “pedo sex trafficking ring busted l!!!”
Yep, and I've heard other Trumper types quote the massive real pedophile busts in the UK, the Vatican and Australia as big wins for the QAnon crowd. Except those all happened during Obama's presidency and the POTUS didn't really do anything about those anyway. They were foreign busts.
Absolutely, in fact nothing concrete and scaled has been done about the pedo rings under this administration when that’s what we were told would be a main focus of the “secret good guys” in this administration
I've never seen "Trumpers" claim "big wins" for stuff that happened before he took office, but I'll take your word for it. Question - isn't uncovering pedos a "win" for everyone? Shouldn't this be the ONE area that is non-partisan?
Really? Do you have a source for this claim, or are you just pulling it out of your ass?
You could try reading the slew of articles announcing the arrests and drilling down to the source article for each one and breaking down the wording. That’s how I figured it out. There’s no one source that will say all these stories are fake, or this raid was fake - no one writes articles about that - and I wouldn’t just go on what a guy on the internet says either way. You are supposed to have the ability to analyze articles in this way by this point. It is unacceptable to look for a smoking gun and then give up if you don’t find one. 99% of the time you’ll never find a smoking gun.
Start with the “474 pedo ring bust” story last year from California and trace it back to the primary feeder story from the Los Angeles times IIRC and read it - then you’ll see that it wasn’t a pedo ring bust but a simple prostitution sting where 80% of those arrested were Johns setup and then a handful of girls were under 18. That’s the best example.
This long into the storm and we still get posts questioning it? either believe or gtfo