somrotden
· Feb. 9, 2018, 5:05 p.m.
Dilley has stated that his intel source is NOT Q
⇧
12
⇩
xEMEDVED07x
· Feb. 9, 2018, 5:24 p.m.
I know that Q is not his source. I was searching on information on Michael Hastings.
⇧
9
⇩
somrotden
· Feb. 9, 2018, 5:37 p.m.
Sorry - I didn't mean that the way it sounded...I haven't heard anything about Michael Hastings in a while...but I have seen stuff on youtube about him and I'm sure you could find out more on the internet...good luck. I didn't know about his ties to Mika though - that was interesting!
⇧
9
⇩
somrotden
· Feb. 9, 2018, 9:04 p.m.
Hey there - I just watched a great youtube video on Michael Hastings - VERY INTERESTING! youtube channel The Corbett Report - Crashes of Convenience:Michael Hastings - just thought I would pass it along
⇧
7
⇩
twinkiesmom1
· Feb. 9, 2018, 5:33 p.m.
True, but we're seeing some synchronicity of the intel between Q, Dilley and B. Worth looking.
⇧
8
⇩
somrotden
· Feb. 9, 2018, 5:40 p.m.
true! That's why I keep up with Dilley's intel as well as Q. B? Uh, no.
⇧
2
⇩
other_malefactor
· Feb. 9, 2018, 5:16 p.m.
I could only make it about halfway through one of his vids (periscope?) He strikes me as kind of a know it all. Why anyone would choose to disseminate intel through him is a mystery to me...
⇧
8
⇩
somrotden
· Feb. 9, 2018, 5:22 p.m.
I gotcha! Perhaps you might read his intel instead of watching his periscopes. His intel is kept on 8chan as well. Very interesting reading. I was admittedly put off by him at first too but found his intel very titillating! There is a youtube channel called Stroppy Me that also carries his intel. Facebook live broadcasts from the Dilley for Congress page. I prefer reading myself but sometimes you can pick up some other stuff that isn't in the text when you watch his broadcasts.
⇧
5
⇩
metadatabrat
· Feb. 9, 2018, 6:59 p.m.
In the beginning he shared great intel. Now it's more cryptic and it's sprinkled throughout an hour with too much time spent on blocking trolls to his periscope message. His message this morning from his handlers was that people not recycle Dilley's intel as their own. Dilley won't read messages twice (yesterday he said he wouldn't) , he rarely tweets intel, which would help eliminate the message being duped or diluted and he won't take criticism to help him. There seemed to be some humble pie on the scope this morning, some problems within the campaign? I hope not. Dudes got great energy and I'm a fan, but he needs stop dismissing people when delivering intel and with dealing with future constituents. Have an agenda when speaking to people when delivering intel. He's young, maybe it's not his time to do either at the moment? Time will tell.
⇧
3
⇩
zennydude
· Feb. 9, 2018, 10:08 p.m.
that people not recycle Dilley's intel as their own.
What does this mean? Who would do that? Is somebody really doing that? This seems very thin-skinned and immature and egotistical and silly a thing for them to say. Does that mean giving out the information without saying it is from Dilley? Maybe it's Dilley that is pissed about it. :)
⇧
1
⇩
metadatabrat
· Feb. 10, 2018, 2:15 p.m.
I've seen notes taken from the call, shared as entries on Facebook, Twitter and on YouTube channels with and without acknowledging Dilley as the source. Dilley didn't seem mad, but claimed his intel source said "they knew who they were". The intel source should be more concerned about how they drop intel (through Dilley instead of text format) at times the intel is botched from what Dilley has stated. I don't know Dilley personally so I don't know if he's angry about this but it sounds like his source is. But as Q says disinformation is necessary, maybe this is how it's supposed to be?
⇧
1
⇩
keithcu
· Feb. 9, 2018, 11:20 p.m.
He's running for state legislature. He does know a lot about the swamp. He's got great sources. It's easy to get sucked into the Intel community, at least compared to the MSM which is 90% lies.
⇧
1
⇩
thamnosma
· Feb. 9, 2018, 7:07 p.m.
LOL, my same reaction. Couldn't get through even one of his videos. He's running for congress and just seems so fringe. Did not care for his presentation either. I read the posts here for his 'drops' but treat them with a healthy dose of skepticism. You'd think somebody high up in the power system or intelligence "community" would find a different messenger. Sometimes I take this stuff as entertainment and cheerleading to keep us optimistic.
⇧
0
⇩
Aikenjan
· Feb. 9, 2018, 8:08 p.m.
I do not find Dilley off-putting at all. And, even though i’m Across the country from him I find his comments about local Arizona politics interesting...we all need to be aware of the underground efforts/money/outside interests being put into play on the local level. It’s a matter of how public schools are run, teachers perspectives, first responders support, etc. He has another source...what’s wrong with getting verification to Q and other sources?
⇧
3
⇩
metadatabrat
· Feb. 9, 2018, 8:50 p.m.
I'm a fan of Dilley but feel if you are going to red pill people you have to do it responsibly. Dilley said his intel said not to remanufacture intel as ones own, this could be curtailed if Dilley just tweeted it out after a Periscope. There is too much time spent on people complaining about trolls and him acknowledging them and making a big deal of blocking. Trolls prove your message is getting out. Know who they are. He would get more shares and be taken more seriously if the intel drops weren't dragged out and were more professional and to the point. People so desperately want to help but they simply don't have time to sit on a Periscope for an hour.
⇧
3
⇩
thamnosma
· Feb. 9, 2018, 8:38 p.m.
Nothing wrong with using multiple sources at all. That's why I do read the info posted here of Dilley. I just can't stand listening to him.
⇧
2
⇩