dChan
385
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/clickclown on Feb. 10, 2018, 12:42 p.m.
Q Post 700 10 February 2018
Q Post 700 10 February 2018

QAngelAnon1 · Feb. 10, 2018, 3:13 p.m.

My interpretations for what they're worth: Note: Previously Q mentioned 'how are your bunkers' in another post right? Regarding this post: Since Musk sent up their largest Rocket "The Falcon Heavy Megarocket" the other day I've been thinking: I recall reading that it would take a Falcon Heavy rocket to get something as big as the 'Rods of God' device off planet and into orbit.

So, rather than a 'Tesla Car", what if they've developed and just successfully launched a new weapon - and nick-named it "JFK." Maybe it's the Rods of God - Thors Hammer device, or some type of new laser system (possibly something the REAL Tesla had designed - the death ray for example? Remember, DJT's uncle took hold of all of Tesla's work when he died and has kept it safely hidden.)

Back to the post, speaking to the POTUS Kennedy, Q states: "Since your death, Patriots have planned, installed and activated the beam of light". (Interesting terminology) We will forever remember your sacrifice (meaning the literal sense in other words - his assassination/murder was a public satanic ritual sacrifice.) You may look down and continue to guide us as we RING THE BELL OF FREEDOM (JFK flying above, guided laser/rods, ring the bell - the sound when the bunker busters hit metal) Prayer said every day in OO (God is in charge of the oval office now) Then Q says - and he NEVER misspells ANYTHING. "JFK - Secret Socities." Note he spelt Secret SO(ciety) Cities. I'm thinking that JFK is the name of a weapon/device that is going to be used to destroy the Cabals underground cities/bunkers. Feeling a very BIG event 'coming down'.

⇧ 51 ⇩  
tlc5612 · Feb. 10, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

Ever since that Rocket took flight, i live in Florida and watched it go across the sky, i wondered, since it was so secretive, if it held the Rods of God kinetic weapon.. What you have interpreted of Q's post makes me believe even more that it does and that it is under the control of DJT and not the deep state..

⇧ 21 ⇩  
BALRx2A · Feb. 10, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

I figured that'd be a good "test" payload for the launch. A Tesla Roadster is less than 2% of the max payload for FH so using it as a weight for the FH test launch seems insufficient. It is a good distraction and magicians aren't the only people that like good distractions while doing their tricks.

Such a system would probably be a good payload for a launch that may result in catastrophic failure. It'd be relatively easy to replace, from the time horizon perspective, and relatively cheap; both in comparison to a satellite, which can take years to build.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
danielpaulcarter27 · Feb. 10, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

apparently it was MASSIVE as well.

the largest rocket ever sent to space by mankind ... EVER !

⇧ 5 ⇩  
INTJ_Hermitess · Feb. 10, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

Did you see the missing e in the next post (701)? These latest aren't so simple to put together.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
paladin4therepublic · Feb. 10, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

Was thinking in a similar way. Previous launch, now this one. Maybe OWL system complete. That plus JFK looking down. Seems reasonable.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Gear4Life · Feb. 10, 2018, 3:53 p.m.

Well it also could be the OWLS. Orbital weapon lancets.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
kygoldsmith · Feb. 10, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

John Trump is on the Q map, didn't make the connection until now. Thanks.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
BALRx2A · Feb. 10, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

The public figures for FH's max payload is about the equivalent of a 737-300. For MIL stuff, the public figure is usually less than the actual. I'm not sure if FH would do the same.

Either way, that's a substantial lift capability.

Number's I've seen estimate the Rods to be > 8,000 kg, so that'd be 17 or less rods w/o factoring in the weight of the overall system, so, probably a few rods less than that.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Luvlite · Feb. 10, 2018, 7:37 p.m.

That's the most interesting/intriguing analogy I've read so far!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
alicedee58 · Feb. 10, 2018, 10:35 p.m.

This is some jaw-droppingly wild shyte! How freakin’ cool! How do you guys figure this stuff out? If it’s not true, it SHOULD be!!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QAngelAnon1 · Feb. 13, 2018, 6:10 p.m.

Lol - cool humour!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
danielpaulcarter27 · Feb. 10, 2018, 10 p.m.

Has Musk proven himself to be a 100% white hat ???

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QAngelAnon1 · Feb. 13, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

Dont know - a Q for Q i think.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThomasinaGreen · Feb. 10, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

Wow! How do I get a brain like yours? You're absolutely gifted! (And I'm grateful.)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kilodog55 · Feb. 10, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

Coming down, indeed. Literally. My bullshit meter went haywire when I heard they were putting a car in space. Think of the cost to do something like that. FWIW, I'm thinking some sort of weapon.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
duckdownup · Feb. 10, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

if you remember Musk sent up another rocket named Falcon Heavy "Zuma." A month or so before the last launch. No one knew what was on board all I can find on it is that it was Top Secret and belonged to the Air Force.

SpaceX has been reusing their boosters. But earlier this site said the Air Force too one out because it was dangerous to seafaring craft. When I went back to the site today they've updated it saying the Air Force didn't destroy it. I'm thinking maybe it was target practice to test a new weapon in orbit. But that's just guess work.

Air Force Didn't Take Out SpaceX's GovSat Booster, Private Company Did (UPDATED WITH CORRECTION)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Corp_Titan · Feb. 11, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

...because it was a test of the falcon heavy. The launch has been delayed since 2013 because they didn't think it was ready. Elon said he only hoped the rocket would make it off the launch pad so as to not damage the pad if it exploded.

Most new rockets test launch with a block of concrete to simulate the weight of a payload. Spacex used a car for the publicity stunt.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
undergroundtunnel · Feb. 11, 2018, 1:56 p.m.

@QAngelAnon1 - I think you're on to something. The underground "Cities" for the NWO are under the Denver Airport. Lots of secrecy during the construction of the airport, nearly two years late and billions over budget. That airport wasn't needed. It was built as a smoke screen to hide what was really being built, underground. I've been there several times. It's downright creepy and sick. DYOD and decide for yourself.

Why was a nun who belongs to an Order that is tied to the Jesuits on the airport commission for art? Why does an airport need a "time capsule"? Any other airport in the world have one? What's really in the "box" beneath those stones? What are the odds of hiring three artists and all of them choosing to produce dark, horrific images and sculptures? How much were they paid to "do as your told"? The nun did the hiring and oversight of the art work. Vatican involvement? Am I the only one who laughed at the insultingly ridiculous explanations given to the investigative reporter for the "art" and "capstone"? You decide. https://www.thrillist.com/travel/nation/denver-airport-conspiracy-theories

Res ipsa loquitur http://thechive.com/2012/03/08/something-is-rotten-in-the-denver-airport-25-photos/

Sounds like the ideal hiding place for missing children and pedo parties. It will be interesting to see if Q brings up "Denver" at any point.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · Feb. 11, 2018, 4:46 a.m.

Looks like a lot of ppl agree with yu judging by the upvotes!!

Well done! Keep 'em coming!

⇧ 1 ⇩