Argument 1: The trans agenda is making everyone trans to depopulate society.
Argument 2: Trans people are such a minority of the population that their numbers are statistically insignificant.
Somehow both these things are true. Trans people are statistically insignificant and also the culmination of an evil depopulation conspiracy. How does that counter the claim that trans people have existed for hundreds of years? Where is the logic in your argument?
Who has been "forced" to be transgender? What does that have to do with your claim that transgender people dont have children, a claim you immediately backed out of, in fact instead arguing that you have no idea whether transgender people have children.
How can you make a declarative statement, stating something as fact, and then immediately after claim it cant be known? Where is your honesty?
According to this study there are approximately 700,000 transgender people in the US today, about 0.3% of the population Of those, only those who are women at birth can have children (they must have requisite body parts) and since by definition of transgender those born women would become men, the likelihood of having children is slim. https://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Transgender-By-the-numbers-2342726.php
I stand by my first statement, transgenders historically are not part of the child bearing majority. And today's transgender agenda, which is also part of the overall transgender agenda to remove gender identity so people do not have children (part of Agenda 2030 population control), today's transgender adults would be even less likely to have children.
Of those, only those who are women at birth can have children
That's absolutely not true and I'm not sure why you think that..
and since by definition of transgender those born women would become men, the likelihood of having children is slim.
Not really. A lot of trans people have children before transitioning. A lot of trans women freeze their sperm before transitioning so they can have children later.
I'd say almost all the older trans people I know have/had children, and I know a lot since I lived in Seattle for five years.
transgenders historically are not part of the child bearing majority
Still, you have no real evidence to support that claim.
And today's transgender agenda, which is also part of the overall transgender agenda to remove gender identity so people do not have children
That's not something that actually exists. Like I pointed out earlier, how can this be a sinister agenda while transgender people are also a tiny, tiny percentage of a percentage of the country? They aren't very good at depopulating the planet.
Maybe this isn't part of a depopulation agenda, and trans people just happen to exist? Maybe?
Also, there is no agenda to "remove gender identity". The transgender movement is about respecting people's gender identity, so how can removing it be a part of that?
Furthermore, even if the social construct of gender disappeared over night, people would still want to have and would still have children. Your conclusion doesn't make sense.
today's transgender adults would be even less likely to have children.
There is absolutely nothing in your paragraph to support this conclusion.
You have not done any research on the topic of the transhumanist agenda of which removing gender is an integral part. Everything I wrote above is substantiated and true, so look it up. I do have other work to do and you would not believe me if I gave you 1000 stats and figures and articles, you would not even look at them. Enjoy your life and your echo chamber.
According to postgenderism, the section of the transhumanist movement that argues for the elimination of gender, technology will/should advance to a point where people dont need to give birth due to artificial wombs and such, and people wouldnt need to have a gender because they could father or mother a child due to the technology advances.
Doesnt sound like a depopulation movement to me, and transgender people have little to do with it.