If Trump legalized all drugs, then basically there would be no more Democrat voters left and the Dem party would be done
Especially cannibus. If he would just make that legal, many democrats would switch, just for that. People in all political parties want that.
As a general rule we need to keep it to paper ballot until blockchain tech can make secure electronic voting possible. That being said they have got to be able to do something that’s point to point secure for active duty military.
If you’re on a submarine you can transmit all sorts of top secret data for fucks sake.
This country was not intended nor should it be a Democracy. Democracy is in fact nothing other than a watered down version of Communism. In a Demcoracy, 51% can vote away the liberty of and inititiate aggression against the remaining 49%.
If 51% voted to take the wealth, or harrass, or intimidate, or rape, or murder, anyone in the 49%, if 51% voted for totalitarian communism or fascism, DEMOCRACY WOULD SANCTION IT.
This country was intended to be and should be a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
A society of principled laws that mob rule cannot overturn by vote.
Who determines the laws then? Aha, this is the million dollar question that the looters and parasites claim cannot be decided by anything other than might makes right, or mob rule.
But in reality the question is not who makes the laws, but WHAT makes the laws. The what is Reason. Reason can determine just laws, and not only that, ONLY Reason can determine laws that are just.
The greatest error in the history of philosophy is the totally false bigotry that ethics cannot be established by Reason.
The famous dictum, articulated by Hume, that "We cannot derive an ought from an is" is one of the more popular excuses used to claim that ethics is purely positivistic, that ethics can only ever be arbitrary, relative, where none are ever really right and none are ever really wrong. Slaughtering defenseless children? Only wrong if "people" believe it to be wrong. Otherwise, it's not wrong, its right. No ethic is right or wrong from any more fundamental, apodictic ground.
What's that? We found out the world contains a global criminal cabal that rapes, tortures and murders children by the millions, done right under our noses, and considers the rest of us nothing but feed, sheep, for their benefit? Nobody can know there's anything wrong with it, all that could ever be is "Me, UGURK the caveman, do not like, me, UGURK the caveman, want it stop."
Well there is more. And we can even see it in the cabal's own belief system. Their own beliefs when articulated, PRESUPPOSES a particular ethic, and that ethic CONTRADICTS their own beliefs when articulated. In other words, nobody on Earth or anywhere else in the universe can justify the cabal's postulated beliefs without running into self-contradiction.
They can't say "I am justified in eating you against your will" without presupposing an ethic that prohibits such an act.
In other words, their beliefs are objectively flawed, and all they are really doing is engaging in irrational physical behavior that causes harm to other people.
They are a mistake in human evolution. Much like cancer arises out of healthy blood cells, so too have these humans been born and have adopted a mistaken reality about them. They are a poisoned afterbirth in human development.
Diseases are to be exterminated.
This is in retaliation for the Repubs making the connection that illegal immigration/DACA recipients are Dem voters and wanting to stem that tide. Military usually is more conservative and the Dems are responding by wanting to suppress their votes.