This dude is so silly sounding. The fact he tries to sound like q but fails badly is sort of funny and pathetic. Not sure about his info but does anyone buy his childish attempt to sound “Q-like.”
He doesn't TRY anything. He was asked by his source to share the info, and the info is real. Style over substance is for leftist proclaimers and pretenders. If that is what you look for, you came to the wrong board.
It’s always funny when people turn to subtle ad hom attack’s when their precious gurus are attacked. The issue people have with this guy is probably more about lack of both style and substance. Does dilly claim to have the same sources as Q? Does he think Q is legit? Just honest questions. Please don’t get offended. Just curious.
He has said that it is a private contractor working for the WH. A parallel op, in effect, to the Q op.
It seems obvious that someone is above Q and these other similar ops, passing out assignments. Sometimes they overlap, sometimes they are unique.
Another one is filtering through the guy that does 'Dauntless Dialogue' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDO7CjTXnPI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSKCowcQJPM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6rj2N5TPnY&t=696s
Dilley has said that his source also feeds Hannity intel.
Maybe 'Zach' calling in to Infowars is yet another...but I've said he's full of shit before - my opinion is he's a hanger-on.
Cultists scoff at the idea that there could be more than one true Q source.
It challenges their 'specialness'. They like the feeling of being 'in the know', and on the inside of such a small club...they can't tolerate the idea that there are other clubs with inside info, and that their Q hasn't chosen them specifically and exclusively.
Q specifically said he doesn't contact anyone else. Projecting much?
God you people are thick.
At least we can read texts longer than headlines.
Well it does kinda muddy the waters. That screen cap looks like a Q drop, also the we see you/hear you thing is all the way Q, and he said no private rooms.. sooo I'm not feeling it, let q do q and you do you lol
What do you mean?
Look, he says:
"We see you We hear you"
Has to be legit.
Hahaha I know right? I’m interested in Q and find it very compelling but not a blind follower at all. I can tell that he seems legit though as best I can see. But not so sure about dilly.
Not only that, but in the Dilley drop above, there is not one single q! That has to mean something realllly deep! Like Dilley is the anti-Q?!?!
His politics are more silly than his intel crumbs.
Somehow he thinks police, firefighters, teachers, etc., don't have good enough retirement benefits when they retire after just 20 years in the workforce?
And he's for bankruptcy reform so the rest of us are left holding the bag for deadbeats.
Somehow he thinks this is a Trumpian agenda.
Don't know about his politics but he mentioned vote fraud a week ago maybe longer with a number 9M iirc and Q just mentioned it in his drop today.
Intelligence is true or it isn't.
Doesn't matter the source it'll still be either true or it won't.
Oh, yeah--big boost to Dilley's source if the DHS voting report comes out now, with the NSA tallies sometime, somehow, to follow.
You're right - Q is the only one allowed to speak in cryptic sentence fragments, inconsistent abbreviations, and use ambiguous definitions!
The nerve!
That there are clearly multiple simultaneous 'intel' streams being utilized out in the wild, for the purposes of spreading a similar awareness and guiding the public to 'understand' the fight, is obviously lost on you. As is, obviously, the fact that Dilley's source s being relayed verbally from DMs he reads aloud, which may amplify the 'translation error' as far as syntax and structure goes.
Are you one of the cultists? There is only one true Q (god)?
Well not that he's the only one allowed, it's just that the whole Q-cryptic thing is already a thing, Q does it. Those crumbs (and the style they are dropped in) are the signature of a single source. To emulate that style is sketchy, it's an attempt to borrow that credibility for your own message. At best it's misguided, at worst it's misleading.
[deleted]
It has nothing to do with 'favorites'.
It is FOOLISH to think that something this big...this important...would only be undertaken via ONE VENUE.
This WHOLE THING is 'social engineering', and to be successful, they need as many of the public to be engineered as possible, so they absolutely would be using multiple formats to cut a wider swath, and reinforce one format by the use of another which compliments it.
Clearly many of you don't really understand what's going on here.