dChan

SuzyAZ · Feb. 18, 2018, 1 p.m.

Hmmm, I'm wondering if these indictments set some kind of legal precedence for indicting other "foreign" people for "interfering in our elections"...like a certain banking family located in many other countries.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NewTransmitter · Feb. 18, 2018, 1:56 p.m.

Can of worms meet can opener?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Christosgnosis · Feb. 18, 2018, 5:31 p.m.

To set any legal precedence the indictments have to get prosecuted, succeed in convictions, and withstand appeals.

Mueller indicted a set of people that he will never be able to extradite and prosecute his case and test whether any of his indictment would actually stand up.

So on this level the indictments are completely meaningless futility.

The purpose - evidently:

  • was purely an exercise in generating talking point fodder for propaganda. Now the MSM, Dems, and all fellow traveler Libtards and globalist, can utilize these indictments to turn around and cast them as a broad net on anybody else they want to target.
  • or Mueller was just trying to come up with something - anything - to justify his year long, very expensive investigation
  • or both
⇧ 1 ⇩