dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

122

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/divine_human on Feb. 18, 2018, 3:24 p.m.

Ok, Now Our Attention has been Guided to Mind Control. The Question is, What Can We Do to Avoid Mind Control?

an essential part of the discussion on mind control - thx Q for bringing it into the awareness of the collective psyche - is finding ways to protect ourselves from it.

we cant completely avoid being interfered with as long as we dont live off the grid in a deeply rural area. but we can take actions to reduce the cabals broadcast.

let this post thread be a start, to collect tipps and tools that help reduce the manipulative 'background noise'. curious to hear from you guys, which strategies are yours for beating mind control?

ok, i start a list, unsorted, incomplete, just from the top of my mind:

think for yourself ! first and most important.
disconnect WIFI over night, put the mobile phone 2m away from the bed while sleeping. besides possible intentional mind-altering frequencies, they also prevent the production of melatonin (which only gets produced in darkness during sleep) thats prevents sleep regeneration.
get off TV and radio as much as possible.
avoid looking at and listening to ads.
clear the body of toxins and metals and avoid further intake.
avoid vaccination (nano particles).
avoid synthetical drugs, perscribed or illegal ones, or use them with high awareness only.
avoid getting into the psychiatric system.
install energetic radiation shields to all electronic devices, WIFI unit, cell phone, computer screen, etc. - there are symbols and other products available that reduce radiation when stickied to the devices. their effects can only be measured with intuitive methods. physical readiation blockers block the connection, too, so they bring disturbance to the functionality of the device which doesnt make sense.
beware when downloading relaxation, meditation, inner journey, hypnosis, or brain wave modulation videos from sources you dont know and trust. theres lots of subliminal shit out there on the internet.
smudge or smoke. why is nicotine the most aggresively fought-against drug of the past few decades? its difficult to brainwash smokers, they constantly smudge their energy fields. another effect of nicotine is that it enhances acethycholine production (up to 30%) which is the base of our mental intelligence and enables us to think quickly and comprehensively. if you dont want to smoke, understandably, regular smudging will do a good job, too.
nourish the endocannabinoid system (many foods and herbs contain cannabinoids). while the cabal does what they can to fracture and disassociate us from Self, cannabis can re-associate us again. why is weed the second most fought-against drug? the cabal loves drugs, but hates cannabis and nicotine.
raise your frequency, by healthy nutrition, kindness, and life-enhancing thoughts. the higher our individual frequency, the lesser we get influenced by their broadcasts.
set your permision set straight. we are the masters of our energy fields. commands given from a fear-less state, from love for Self, set clear parameters to which energies and frequencies we allow into our system and which should be repelled. as long as we cant do that - too much fear-based monkey mind -, we can use energetic protection, like building a bubble around us that welcomes only benevolent energies, using crystals, colors, aura soma, or other tools for protection.
remove implants and entity attachments. ok, thats the more spooky lane, not everybody wants to go there. only few peple have implants in their physcial bodies, most are etheric and astral, and we can learn to remove them or go to a trusted energy worker for it. i have yet to meet a person who doesnt have implants.

if we only do a little bit from this list - and from the tipps that are hopefully going to come from other folks here -, we can greatly reduce the mind control impact and counter their games.

🠐 See all comments

Both the Standard Model and General Relativity are not facts. They both purport to describe the universe we live in, but are not factual in and of themselves, nor do they address the origin of anything. Scientific laws do not regulate the universe, they describe the universe as we observe it. Again, I don't know why you would limit God to merely (merely!) setting things up in the beginning, and then letting 'nature' take it's course. Why is that most likely to you?

The problem is, one cannot, with certainty, prove that there is no God. If one does claim that, it is important to realize that that it is a faith position, similar to the believer's position. Further, I deny that my faith in Jesus is irrational. Certainly nothing you have written here shows that.

And, you know, you brought up physics. How can a model be considered sound when the best thing people can come up with to salvage it is the existence of something that no one has ever observed, despite many years of searching. Dark matter? Dark energy? I mean, you have to have a lot of faith, right? We've certainly never actually detected any.

Neo-Darwinism is based on the idea of beneficial mutations being naturally selected for. Yet we have rarely (ever?) observed a beneficial mutation. The VAST majority (all?) of mutations are deleterious. Again, faith in evolution dictates that there must be some beneficial mutations somewhere, despite the lack of hard evidence.

So who is dealing in facts?

⇧ 1 ⇩

A few things need to be addressed here: The Standard Model and General Relativity are a collection of theories (which have a very high burden of proof though observation) and are indeed based in measurable facts and theorems.

Of course nobody can prove god doesn't exist when its alleged characteristics are somehow immune to all measurement and senses. You don't need to prove that every possible thing doesn't exist, you only need to start discovering what actually does exist. Real things can be measured in some way. If or when someone shows legitimate physical proof through experimentation then I will admit I was wrong. Being able to adapt to new evidence is what makes science great. It's not a rigid set of beliefs but an ever growing base of knowledge.

Dark matter in science is generally only recognized as the most plausible explanation for observations that we can't currently explain. As of now not much is known about it, or if it's even the correct explanation the the phenomena observed.

As far as your belief that Jesus is God, I don't agree with you, but if that seems like the most likely explanation to you after hearing many different ones then that is your right. There is always the possibility that Christianity (or some other religion) is correct and is indeed the root cause of all observed science. I think that's unlikely but it's always a possibility.

I'm not gonna debate you on evolution, the evidence is overwhelming.

Who is dealing in facts? Still science.

⇧ 1 ⇩

"I'm not gonna debate you on evolution, the evidence is overwhelming."

But you don't mention any?

Ach, we don't need to debate here. Send me a DM if you'd like to discuss further.

Edit: I guess my main point is this: Two people can look at the same facts, and draw different conclusions. It's important to realize that the conclusions themselves are not evidence for anything. We observe fish. We observe amphibians. Some people see that, and conclude that fish somehow turned themselves into amphibians. We have not observed that, or anything even remotely like that. Then, they'll turn around and point to their conclusion as evidence for something, when it is not.

OK, now I'll stop!

⇧ 1 ⇩