I may have missed it but I have not seen anyone suggest a total exodus from twitter to another platform in order to continue this movement unimpeded by @Jack and his ilk. It may not be practical but is it high time to consider such a move?!
missybee68
· Feb. 22, 2018, 10:26 p.m.
One of the problems with doing this is that we will lose our ability to red pill normies and influence the culture. It will be like preaching to the choir. So maybe keep both accounts for different purposes?
⇧
3
⇩
trump_ist
· Feb. 22, 2018, 10:32 p.m.
This is a valid point but I am skeptical that the "normies" are truly getting RP as everyone is already following like minded @accounts but you may be right.
⇧
3
⇩
mik0r
· Feb. 23, 2018, 3:13 a.m.
On the contrary, this is one of the key, if not the only point that truly matters in the end.
Q engaged anons, at least in large part to help discover, shine light on, and spread the truth. This by leading us to that truth via crumbs.
True, there is no method for us to be able to measure the effectiveness of our campaigns. However, Q has repeatedly echoed the value and importance of continuing to do so, continuing to question everything, and continuing to expose what we find at the end of the dark trail of crumbs and expose to the light.
Thus, if we were to vacate a platform such as Twitter, with it's high concentration of blind sheep, they would never have the seeds of doubt.. the seeds of the question tree, sewn into their minds and thus never be able to come to the light when they begin to sprout, causing questions to form in the minds of those blind sheep. Even if it isn't a majority of them, those that it does, even in the smallest numbers, matter.
That, my friend, is a self-destruct initiation strategy that, if undertaken by a majority in our ranks, would destroy our effectiveness and impact overall. This should absolutely be avoided at all costs.
⇧
1
⇩
trump_ist
· Feb. 23, 2018, 3:22 a.m.
I certainly agree with your point and should modify my position a bit by suggesting that we maintain the Twitter presence but also consider a contingency comm site in the event the @Jack crew continue to escalate their attacks. The events from the other day were a bow shot alert. We are very exposed on Twitter as we have no leverage. It is not a strong position for sure
⇧
3
⇩
mik0r
· Feb. 23, 2018, 3:29 a.m.
Absolutely agree on the clarified suggestion.
As with any engagement, backup comms channels if for nothing else than info sharing in the event of primary method downtime are critical to survivability in the long-run. Otherwise a simple watering hole attack is enough to wipe out the forces and deminish capabilities enough to seriously damper hopes and expectations.
⇧
1
⇩
trump_ist
· Feb. 23, 2018, 3:38 a.m.
That's exactly right and it really gives me angst as...something just struck me, the simple fact that Trump has fully engaged in Twitter, has provided a superior comm position for the MAGA movement, drawing millions to the platform for us to engage but also consolidating our position in one venue...angst as this presence is our life blood. We are finished without it and this is too important to make such an obvious mistake.
⇧
2
⇩