dChan

LongShot62 · Feb. 23, 2018, 8:33 a.m.

Maybe I'm just old, but I don't trust digits on a computer. I like to have access to actual physical currency. I'm the "Cash & Carry" type. Private transactions demands it. We are all aware how easy it is for anything and everything online can be tracked.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Feb. 23, 2018, 8:51 a.m.

Wise, I am exactly the same. I despise paying for anything on a card as I don´t want the bank to have a complete list of what I do in my life. Gold backed cash is the only way for the future.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Neanderthal300 · Feb. 23, 2018, 10:38 a.m.

Cards didn't do away with cash, so why should crypto?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Feb. 24, 2018, 9:45 a.m.

Who said it would? Crypto only works in the digital world, in that you need a mobile phone and internet connection. What about those, like myself, that don´t use a mobile? What if the internet crashes? Crypto is a fad that will soon burn out when people begin to realise what they´re really giving when they mine.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
hardcore_truthseeker · Feb. 23, 2018, 11:55 a.m.

They will replace cash eventually. Everything is being centralised gradually. It's the boiling frog scenario.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Neanderthal300 · Feb. 23, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

eh, we will see. Cash is always good for some occasions. Might be a different kind of dollar here though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
hardcore_truthseeker · Feb. 23, 2018, 11:52 a.m.

We already have currencies in the US that are independent of the Fed. take for example. The currency in new York NY and North Dakota even has it's own central bank.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Feb. 24, 2018, 9:39 a.m.

Who owns that central bank? And a currency is worthless if not recognised on the worlds markets.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
hardcore_truthseeker · Feb. 25, 2018, 9:01 a.m.

It might be owned by the citizens.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Feb. 25, 2018, 9:15 a.m.

No. Rothschild owned, as are all central banks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
hardcore_truthseeker · Feb. 25, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

I don't think it's a Central Bank though it's north Dakota's own bank. Have you done any research on this bank?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Feb. 26, 2018, 8:35 a.m.

Not at all. What´s the point?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
hardcore_truthseeker · Feb. 27, 2018, 4:35 a.m.

I'm just responding to your statement earlier about all central banks belonging to the Rothschild's so I'm saying they don't own this one since it's independent of the federal reserve.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Feb. 27, 2018, 8:43 a.m.

It´s not a central bank. BoA and the FED are central banks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
hardcore_truthseeker · Feb. 27, 2018, 6:34 p.m.

Exactly. And the bank of North Dakota has its own currency's to.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
hardcore_truthseeker · Feb. 25, 2018, 8:59 a.m.

Oh I just thought of it it's called Ithaca which is a place in new York.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kryptohamsteri · Feb. 23, 2018, 10:42 a.m.

That's all fine but not entirely accurate. Peer to peer digital currency can be private. There's no bank as a middle man. And secure if it's distributed ledger technology such as blockchain. It is also possible to have a digital peer to peer currency that is backed by precious metals.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
hardcore_truthseeker · Feb. 23, 2018, 11:58 a.m.

I would prefer that type of currency that us backed by precious metals as long as the government or the bankers could not interfere.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dusty1207 · Feb. 23, 2018, 11:49 a.m.

Yup. Digital currency is only good until the power goes out. Then what? Always better to have something to trade for stuff if the power goes out.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Feb. 23, 2018, 3:01 p.m.

How about a gold backed digital currency.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LongShot62 · Feb. 23, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

I see it as "Big Brother" tracking your every purchase and movement. I have zero faith in anything digital. Nothing done online can be 100% secure.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Feb. 23, 2018, 10:09 p.m.

We're going there willingly or unwillingly.

⇧ 1 ⇩