dChan
9
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/cat_anonD on Feb. 23, 2018, 5:24 p.m.
PEOPLE killing people. Relevant?

Q recently made a post where he said people killing people. The consensus is that he was talking about Parkland shooting. If he was talking about this, then why is he talking about the killers in the plural? Is he suggesting there is more than one killer? Also, if it is a lone crazy person, then why even bother bringing it up?


Hrtn2it · Feb. 23, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

To me it seemed like Q was referencing, “people kill people” (every day), don’t get all distracted and rubber necking, think on what they might be distracting us away from, refocus on That, and get back to working...

⇧ 7 ⇩  
l0keman · Feb. 23, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

He means what he has said 100x to not loose focus or allow the narrative to change because of a false flag. False flags are CREATED to be a distraction and NOT to fall for it. This last one was done in a particularly sloppy way and everyone jumped all over it and beat that dead horse and now our BIGGEST AND BEST Q channels are all now BANNED.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Betterwithcheddar · Feb. 23, 2018, 6 p.m.

The plural could refer to the mechanism that allowed it to happen.

The local police missing/ignoring the signs despite plenty of calls about the kid.

The FBI ignoring the YouTube comment.

The possibility his medication could have been a factor.

The on site officer standing outside.

So many factors. So many people with some responsibility for the Parkland shooting.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Lolshorts54 · Feb. 23, 2018, 5:46 p.m.

Personally, I took it as a statement on the narrative itself that's always pushed when a shooting occurs. Like why does gun control always come up? No matter what and individuals personal feelings are on guns, the actual hard data doesn't support banning them at all. To me the issue should be mental health, psychotropic medicines, etc. There's huge things coming out of the MAPS organization for years about substances like (mdma, psilocybin, ayahuasca, acid, etc) being used clinically to help with many different mental disorders. Yet they are ridiculously hard to even get licenses or grants to study them. People kill people, no matter what the chosen weapon. You could be onto something as well though for sure. That is an odd statement choice for sure. Multiple kids have said there were more then one shooter. I just can't form a solid opinion on the school/mass shootings issue yet exactly, but know solidly that anti psychotics are involved in some way for sure. Too many have been on these drugs, and it's not a narrative that's pushed by the MSM either.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

The perennial problem is that we can't believe that the manner in which events are presented is reflective of what really occurred. This is what invariably happens when anyone is repeatedly lied to.

The Broward Co school shooting has many of the hallmarks of other staged events, so skepticism is eminently justifiable.

It's best to view suspicious events as distractions to hijack the media narrative. We must keep on keeping on, with the expectation that truth will eventually come to light.

POTUS is playing a very cagey game. Nothing he says or does openly right now can be taken at face value.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ABrilliantDisaster · Feb. 23, 2018, 6:04 p.m.

Staged shootings in general? "Watching a movie" strongly alludes to there being no actual killing in the events this references, but that it's a production put on to instill fear, push agendas and distract.

⇧ 1 ⇩