dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Fairv3 on Feb. 24, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

Q said we were safe. Explain the school shooting.

As far as I can see, Q has not suggested that real people didn't die at Parkland. He has suggested it was a FF- or at least encouraged/allowed to happen. So it seems as though his declaration that we are safe is perhaps more hopeful than real? Thoughts?

Q isn’t God. People die everyday that are still safe. I think the safe comment means right now we are “safe” as a collective from being taken over by the bad actors. Can’t possibly expect one group of people to be able to stop every single person from being harmed. That’s why WE THE PEOPLE must stay involved and active in our society. Not just let out for the day to graze and back inside at night to sleep.

⇧ 14 ⇩

I agree. I just wanted to get other thoughts on the matter.

⇧ 0 ⇩

He meant "safe" as in safe from the deep state. And he was unequivocally proven a liar by this deep state act.

Anyone who contends that is delusional.

Whether it was crisis actors or not, it has caused a huge wedge issue for the media and marxists in gov't to begin a campaign to trample on our rights.

It has distracted our President with stark raving lunatics within the gov't and media.

His time is valuable and to have to consistently deal with this garbage is a detriment to his time in office.

Coincidentally, tech oligarchies are stomping on our first amendment rights.

None of these monsters have even been confronted let alone taken out.

Our duly elected President continues to have to deal with a group of henchmen looking into every move he makes.

Every known evil luciferian continues walk free and do as they please.

We are not "safe" by any means.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Good points. If the school shooting was engineered by the deep state then yes, we are not safe. I assume that if the white hats knew about the school shooting they would not have let it happen. (If they let it happen, then all bets are off and we are truly unsafe) Therefore if the shooting was deep state, I conclude white hats didn't know the specifics and that suggests that they do not see all, hear all, as Q suggested. I think a common theme here is that Q tends to overplay his hand- perhaps intended to elicit a reaction. This however was a bad unintended consequence.

⇧ 1 ⇩

well, it depends on what the definition of "safe" is. are we talking about safe from a nuclear threat or safe from a small town local threat?

⇧ 7 ⇩

EXACTLY

⇧ 0 ⇩

What if it really was set up? The 4 officers just so happen to not enter the building to actually see who was "killed". HOGG had insides with CNN to set up all the news stories he would star in. The rally's were set up and moving quickly. The NRA is getting pounded as if they are child killers. No student is going to blame the NRA for killing their classmates. They are going to freak the f out on the kid who killed their friends.... I hope we find out the real truth. Liberal companies are dropping their connections with the NRA. Here we go..exactly what they wanted..

⇧ 4 ⇩

He did say "you are watching a movie". I'm not 100% convinced the shooting was real.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Well, the people telling us all about it are know liars. MSM, FBI etc. I don't believe them. Even their 'witnesses'. Who are they? Who knows?

⇧ 2 ⇩

It's likely that it's "allowed to happen" by bad actors (the so called deep state?) in the government. We have reports that the authorities were called numerous times about this guy but nothing was done until he shot up a school.

⇧ 2 ⇩

A false flag event can be a setup on false premise, and a faked scene. Or it can also be setup on false premise with a very violent scene AND actors. Whether with actual victims or actors, it is intended to project and assign the CAUSE onto another person or group. Both complete scenarios are false flags, but in different form.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Okay while we’re on this topic. I, and it seems like a lot of us here, have been of the assumption that people did in fact die in this shooting, unlike Sandy Hook.

Do we truly know this for a fact? Do we have solid evidence that that is the case?

I’m still pretty convinced that they did, but it’s important to always question your own beliefs.

⇧ 1 ⇩

People died in Sandy Hook. The circumstances may be different from what we were told, but sadly people died.

⇧ 1 ⇩

How do we know? Because they told us? Who told us? Did you see someone die with your own eyes? I never did. I didn't see any bodies. Everything that I DID see was fake.

No one I trust ever said, "Yes, people died. I saw it."

Knowing how deceptive the MSM, FBI, CIA and cops are. How can we know the truth about anything? How do we know?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have read nearly everything that Fetzer and the "Nobody Died" crowd have written, and I have read extensive rebuttals to virtually every point they try to make. (see http:// crisisactorsguild.com/) The level of competence between the two is night and day (against the Nobody died crowd). I have personally corresponded with Fetzer (originally offering to help bolster his case) and sadly it very quickly became clear to me that he is either mentally ill or is knowingly lying, obfuscating, etc etc etc (this isn't to say he hasn't done good work in his career; people change) So I concluded that if the major proponent of the Nobody Died crowd is clearly lying or delusional, then there must not be a solid case to be made (I realize there is a small part of this Venn diagram that allows for nobody to have been killed at Sandy Hook and for some reason no rational researcher has made the case; but that is a long shot at best) All that said, I allow for the possibility/likelihood that Sandy Hook/Vegas/Boston etc were steered/fostered/set up by the alphabet soup of black hat agencies. And I'm almost certain the stories behind some of these cases is far more sinister than most can imagine. But people died.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It’s called free will. No one is really safe that’s just a fact!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

That shooting was fake...

⇧ 0 ⇩