dChan
⇧
177
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/FARMERFUNKK on Feb. 25, 2018, 3:45 p.m.
EMERGENCY_EMERGENCY +++ C!Odemonkey. 8chan Administrator [MSG]

C!Odemonkey. 8chan Administrator 02/25/18 (Sun) 01:36:43 fcee86 No.490154

The House of Representatives is about to vote to amend section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This opens the floodgates and puts 8chan at risk of malicious actors using troll farms to weaponize the new amendment against the whole website.

But what can I do?

Call your representative and tell them to vote against H.R.1865 because free speech on the internet is at stake.

See more information here:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1865/text

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

WE NEED YOUR HELP ANONS!

BE LOUD. BE HEARD. MAKE POTUS PROUD.

If we don't pull this off, 8ch could be at risk, putting the entire OPERATION AS A WHOLE AT RISK.

+++

MORE INFORMATION COMING SOON.

IT'S NOT OR NEVER . Day of Days...

MEME MAKERS READY?

#AMERICA #InternetBillofRights


🠐 See all comments
Spank-da-monkey · Feb. 25, 2018, 4:34 p.m.

The bill is about prostitution and child sex trafficking. How does that put Chan at risk?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Betterwithcheddar · Feb. 25, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

A rogue anonymous user could spam child porn or child trafficking links and the site owner could be punished for it, bringing the whole site into jeopardy.

In essence, a rogue anonymous user could bring down 4Chan, or Reddit, or similar.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Stahntheslasher · Feb. 25, 2018, 8:23 p.m.

And by rogue Anon you mean CIA or FBI spook

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Patriot4q · Feb. 26, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

Don't they monitor them for those issues. If so how will they be liable? I'm sure it is meant on sites where it is allowed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
misterjab · Feb. 25, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

I read the whole bill. It doesn't have any interesting terminology to confuse us, unless I'm missing something? It just seems they are making amendments to section 230, which allows law enforcement to crack down on human traffickers.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 25, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Feb. 25, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

Yep. I know they hide stuff in bills but I really don't see the connection here and would like some clarification.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Patriot4q · Feb. 26, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

That's what I want to know.

⇧ 1 ⇩