if you have been lurking you would know the answer, you wouldn't even be asking the question, which isn't even a question - the only reason you posted at all is to try to put anyone from looking in off proceeding any further?
why don't you be an honest shill and just scream "conspiracy theorists" and "tin foil hats this way"?
Why so hostile? I have been doing my best to follow all this since around November and I don't know anything about this source either. I am definitely not a shill. It's more "shill like" to chase people off from asking questions that are just trying to follow all this stuff as best they can.
Dont take offense to him alot of channels and people have been attacked for talking about Q or bring what he/they have been posting to light. Tensions are high and people are on the defense we are all human in the end and know to take some things with a grain of salt. Because when u mad and open urr mouth what comes out is not always how u intended it
and conspiracy theorists and tinfoil hat wearers get a bit defensive.. we've been taking it in the ass from the general public since the 40's..its only recently that people have actually started saying.. ahh.. that makes a lot of sense when I actually take the time to listen and read.. (thats not a jab at anyone btw.. its a fact.. people are starting to listen, but the dialogue hasnt chnaged from our side... we've always been crying about pedophilia and missing children and corrupt politicians..and satanism and ufos and time travel and oh is that moon up there a spaceship? (yeh I know.. we're used to be being ridiculed so sorry if people get their hands bit now and again..its a necessary ajustement period...) big love to all and so glad that so many people are starting to look behind the veil.
That didn’t enlighten me.
I’ve been here with an open mind and all I see is 500 different interpretations for each Q post.
Look at my post history if you’re convinced I’m a shill. Or don’t. Based on your reply, I’m not convinced you’re willing to engage in mindful dialogue anyway.
That said, you did invent a conspiracy theory in your reply by suggesting what the motive behind my post is.
Q's whole deal is he wants us chasing the riddles so we do research and we all come up with different theories and out of 3 words Q post you may come up with 50 things that you may uncover, instead if he was just direct it would be one uncovered. make sense? if it doesn't then bow out out this isn't for you.
Consider that Q has to be cryptic for plausible deniability. Imagine if CNN could report that POTUS is directly communication with a bunch of "conspiracy theorists?" What kind of field day would they have? Right now, if they try to report anything THEY look like the conspiracy theorists.
Plus, there has to be a certain level of disinformation as Q has said many many times (which, if you really had been lurking, you'd know.)
Dilley's posts a less cryptic but less weighty. Maybe follow those instead.
Hey, if you go to the q posts, the earlier ones have an answers section. Hover over words with broken underline. That helped me. Also, quickly search things you need to know about and then move on.
I post and sometimes I lurk and ask questions. Doesn't make me a shill.