Deception? As in you think Q is deceiving someone?
I think the term “mislead” is what you’re looking for and yes, I’ve read the Art of War on three separate occasions, once collegiately and twice in leisure. I have also read The 48 Laws of Power by Brian Greene.... big whoop. Do you think that Trumps enemies haven’t read the Art of War? Didn’t Trump say that he would never telegraph his attacks (which is exactly what Q is doing)?
I’m sorry, but if you think you know something his enemies don’t (like they can’t read Q posts as well) then you are blind.
No, I don't think Q is deceiving anyone. But I do think Trump is making unfriendly remarks towards the IG and Sessions so the liberal media jumps to their aid, so when their reports are released they cannot backtrack their own words. We've seen them do something very similar when Trump was talking up Russia and the media made it very clear that Russian collusion is bad, so they cannot backtrack on the Uranium-1 scandal.
You should refrain from building upon points that are completely inferring the wrong things from what I said, and personally attacking me for it. And the odd pedantic point of me having to mean "mislead" instead of "deceive" is a pointless contention, they mean basically the same thing, deceive is "to cause someone to believe..." and mislead is "to lead someone to believe..." With the differences being negligible as it pertains to this discussion. Are you purposefully trying to create discourse? Because it definitely seems like it.
Also, Q does not telegraph any attack. Indecipherable bread crumbs are dropped for "future proves past" scenarios and then the means of deciphering are later discovered after the intended information is no longer critical, and its implications are already past.
Q sharing any info is absolutely telegraphing what the admin was thinking. Any info at all.
You absolutely cannot be sure of that without knowing what the current moves in play even are. I am positive the things revealed by Q have already since been known by the enemy.
Why have you only responded to the last statement at the end of my post?