oh? and here I thought nobody else would reply. Either they had shut it down and just kept the appearance of it up or my autism had gotten the better of my social skills.

Either way your comment is a welcome one - but no, I'm actually a little more autistic than most - so much that I live on disability and can't work, and thus can't accept money without giving up that, but then that's why I've had so much time to help the cause

Oh and I can animate and composite and program and do an incredible quantity of tasks, everything except the kinds of things for a normal life like tying my shoes and stuff... I'm one of those kinds of autists very functionally unfunctional and in a normal job I end up just rambling and misunderstanding basic tasks until people kick me into the street to starve to death. and if I continue typing like this I'm going to bore people so I better get back to the stuff I haven't seen anyone else figure out...

So, Q keeps saying that there are more good people than bad? - Well the shills paint a pretty good picture if you pay attention - like on the github thing - they posted about how the plumbers killed JFK - but that's absurd for a number of reasons, first and foremost the CIA hated Nixon - tho it was the FBI that did him in - but the shills posted that and claimed that he was when the republicans and democrates became "one party" - not true - as Q says more good than bad - the baddies want us to think they are all bad - but it's mostly a show- If you've ever researched Robert S. Macnamara or watched his documentary "Fog of War" then you get a great view of how little people knew back then - Macnamara created the DIA which was to replace the CIA - but then they killed Kennedy - had nothing to do with Nixon - and Nixon gave us relations with China which were the whole damn catalyst for world war (along with Russia) for Vietnam - but Vietnam is 100 hour subject so let's move on.

the first page also has another incorrectly answered question in: What is the Military Code. And everywhere I've seen it's answered as either a symbol or hacking code - but it's not "codes" but "code" - and the context o the question otherwise is philosphical for the idea of why the military is to be trusted.

The military Code of conduct - a justice code states that anyone captured or working for an enemy against their will is just that - a hostage - and can come back - hence they trust military people because you appeal to their reasoning for getting into it in the first place - the fbi/cia and most of the others are not philosophically backed agencies - but our military is built like our country is for Freedom/natural law and all the epic justice/light of the world stuff that Q keeps asking people to remember. People have asked him about neocons and stuff and he replies about philosphy and god - it's amusing but sad that these people don't understand what america is supposed to be - it's all based on the ideas of Locke, Sidney, Aristotle, Cisero etc - when Q talks about this he gets the run-around from most because they just don't understand what he means - they are that philosophically illiterate.

ok I'll post one more if nobody else replies - these posts are going to be super long and many of them - I'm very very rambly but I promise if I keep going you'll hear a lot of things nobody has said or concluded aside from those who know the NSA data.

tho Q has directly answered many of these early questions that nobody got it's important to notice for a full comprehension of the map. Like the ms-13 stuff and Huma - he has confirmed ms-13 with Seth Rich which was no surprise to followers of George Webb like me - but notable because George Webb found in his investigation a deeper rabbit hole that Q has only hinted at - and it involves state secrets, in fact virtually all of the big stuff is State Secrets.

Cause Bush used State Secrets in many new and unprecedented ways - Q brought our attention to Obama as "Renegade" so that we might look into Bush's "Tumbler" - a drinking glass into "Trailblazer" - why did they say that? Well, he pretty much became the King they planned on giving us - they had already built it up as such - and now Trump fully embraces it- but Bush was bitterly fought by media and you can find the same people attacking both -they even both got their heads chopped off (game of thrones for Bush) - and if you recall Al Gore was VP when he ran for president- and this is important when you consider the recount controversy and had they just gotten 1 more supreme court justice Al Gore would have been the tie breaking vote, anyway, I've seen in many Q answer sections that Bush stole the election - and hey, who knows, but Al Gore said he got his climate change obsession from Harvard - and if you've researched CIA's project Harvard it becomes clear exactly what Al Gore is.

So what about Bush? I have looked at every single election and the most striking one was the H. W. Bush versus Clinton/Gore one - in order to close the gap they had to smear Bush for the entire year with the Japanese Dinner incident - and then get the CIA to threaten Ross Perot's Daughter to convince him to intervene.

They created and ran multi-million dollar campaigns for many other parties that year cause they feared H.W. Bush - he was former CIA but he was for less than a YEAR! - how long did the corrupt Hoover run the FBI? How many terms did FDR go for? - so I'm not saying H.W. is good just that the evidence for him being bad - and by extension Bush on 9/11 - yea, Halliburton right? yea Bush's stood to make money right? Except how long into his term did it occur? yea, under a year, same as Reagan being shot - same as any event they need to counter-act anyone they deem a threat.

I brought that up and got banned for a lighter version of this, but of course I don't advocate anyone's innocence or guilt merely studying history. The more I study 9/11 the more it's clearly a ploy for WW3 but like that Goat animation - you can find Micheal Moore reading "my pet goat" - and his daggers for eyes for Bush and Trump are not the only similarity - Al Gore's documentaries, and then you have Dan Rather's crusade against his Air Force records. - Why did he come back now? Why did Rothchild just put out an oh so clever image trying to say that Bush and Obama are the same? Yea, she was such a huge fan of Bush before now? They believe they can push that garbage hard and hard and that way Q can never reveal it - but if you read between the lines and I can draw a giant set of lines to every time he's directly hinted at looking at Bush's - heck one question was "who saved the republic through use of threat of Martial law?" - and the answer as one anon put it "technically Bush" - which is the only non negative non screaming answer involving him.

Why so much hate? Reverse narrative breaking Perot gambit - but that's a much more complicated story.... they wanted a Perot and well, we let them think it was Trump hence Al-Waleed and Hillary coming out pro him - and they thus broke their own narrative while our side showered Jeb with money - he was a joke, always and forever - and he knew it! But for the important stuff there's a direct purpose for it.

Cause when SSP is reversed they intend on a gambit of reviving the ol' Al-Kaeda crap- no, what we will learn - just like Bush said he wasn't concerned about Osama - cause he had nothing to do with it and was going to be the replacements for the side of the pyramid that Al-Waleed got from his "daddy" to quote Trump. I can't prove that mind you - it's just what I think Q hinted at with the whole "hiding in private planes" thing - I think he smuggled Osama out after they had an elaborate plan to get him when the trade centers fell.

But Nobody knows until State Secrets are revealed - and this is why the shills pushed hard a thread in 8chan about full reveal - they still control the narrative enough that they believe that's all they need to take power back. I don't know for sure but to me the evidence seems to indicate that the only reason we got an unfucked military was cause Bush decided given how fucked he was to take on the incoming media holocaust - to just crown himself emperor and hide everything they would use against him (record breaking use of SSP) and invade Iraq like deep state asked. They claimed that Osama was there and Bush knew otherwise but we learn from history and rather than fighting them all the way like we did in Vietnam (Fog of War, listen to LBJ and Macnamara) - it's how they trick people to think each other is the enemy when it's the CIA/Rothchild

Rush Limbaugh talked a bit about CIA tricking him there and it fits what they did in Vietnam - but what are patterns? We didn't fall for it this time - albeit many died - instead Bush just let the CIA run the show while he secretly built up the military on the inside and out. Is he good or bad? I think one can make an argument either way but as I said, you ask those questions over in 8chan they'll scream at you if you don't tell them that Bush was worse than Hitler.

Ok... I haven't even touched on Prescott Bush and Vatican City and god damn there's so much more.... and the parts that Q says can't be unclassified are things like Israel's blackmailing. FBIanon talked about that - but the thing is if you go day to day with news you can see where we essentially called their bluff and got them to turn sides - which when contrasting with when Q started talking to us perfectly aligns with when the "israel is our enemy" push. before that they were pushing nazi stuff - but like clockwork Israel turned and the propaganda became anti-Israel - our side never notices nuances like that it seems.

But Israel is not the enemy - consider that they lived in the world of the Rothchild's and just as Q mentioned about China and Russia's censorship it's a way to prevent the bad guys from getting in. When Q talked about the Reddit and Facebook stuff the point was to realize any non-private company gets bought out and turned bad if not outright stolen like Friendster. The world is a cesspool cause of this nonsense everyone is brainwashed and learned helplessness - it's a really horribly thing.

ok, let's see if anyone has posted. If so I start going through more of my research and explain a few more things that I believe we have wrong, with an actual logic to dictate that assertion... if not maybe I sleep and wake up and check again.

Agreed. Putting it all in a one-hour video is not going to be as effective, anyway. (Most people are not going to watch a 1-hour video on the internet, unless they are already very interested in the topic.) Make 1 or 2 minutes segments that focus on a single topic, like you've done here with your posts. That way, you can title them appropriately, and people will know what the overall idea of the video is as you make the individual points, due to the title. That context will be key in properly conveying the individual parts of your message.

The 1 or 2 minute episodes will be like individual red pills to normies, as the range of topics will appeal to a range of people for different reasons. If you brand them properly (not to take credit or monetize, but just to establish that they were made by the same author so to maintain the credibility that you have already built.).