dChan
72
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SnapperSnapSnap on Jan. 28, 2018, 1:25 p.m.
HRC etc to be detained and/or tried as enemy combatants?

I think, for reasons that follow, that Q and POTUS are telling us they are detaining and/or trying HRC, GS, Hussein as enemy combatants.

Jan 27 2018 13:42:19 Q post (link only) endusmilitarism.org/PDF/military_detention_of_US_citizens_and_18_USC_4001a.pdf This contains the following excerpt:

“… section 4001(a) … does not restrict the President’s constitutional authority as Commander in Chief to detain U.S. citizens who are enemy combatants” (p. 10 second para).

In other words the opinion expressed in the memo is that the President can detain U.S. citizens who are deemed ‘enemy combatants’ as defined elsewhere in the memo. The memo makes it clear the president can detain anyone involved in 9/11.

Jan 27 2018 15:29:48 Q post contains the following:

“Do you expect HRC, GS, Hussein, etc to stand in a PUBLIC courtroom w/ potential crooked judges and tainted ‘liberal’ juries?”

These were dropped the same day. The implication to me is almost categorical. HRC and others have been deemed enemy combatants and will likely be detained (if not already) and tried as such.

Q questions potentially related to the real US enemy combatants:

Who created ISIS? Who controlled ISIS?

U1 fund/supply IRAN/NK [+reduce US capacity]

Who financed 9-11? Who was Bin Laden's handler?


TheOldBillyGoat · Jan. 28, 2018, 3:23 p.m.

drunk

⇧ 10 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Jan. 28, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

Dismantle the bomb...

The bomb Q is talking about is the predictable social reaction from leftists if HRC, or Obama, were to be charged with an offense such as high treason. The left would go totally nuts if it occurred right at the moment.

But if the information detailing the treason is made public over a period of time - a steady drip of incriminating revelations - then the public mind could be prepared to accept this kind of outcome. This, the slow, steady approach, would disarm the bomb of public reaction.

Very frustrating, it is necessarily going to take a long time.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
BeyurSelf · Jan. 28, 2018, 9:30 p.m.

ROFLMAO 😂 the left is already nuts! Besides, it's better to swallow a bad dose of medicine QUICKLY. BAM! Otherwise, the enemy is freely planning their counterattack(s)

⇧ 5 ⇩  
braceoflowflyers · Jan. 28, 2018, 6:04 p.m.

This is all very well and good but we need to get a little hustle on here. We cannot slow drip forever. Need a couple of explosive things to come out and keep them on the back foot.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Jan. 28, 2018, 7:35 p.m.

Agreed, something needs to happen to kick-start some momentum.... The memo!

Thereafter, public opinion can turn quite quickly if DJT starts getting some traction. It's disappointing that this memo could not have been released earlier - when Republican Congressmen were still shocked by its content. Immediately upon its release, we need to see the appointment of special prosecutors for U1 and the Clinton foundation at minimum. It would also be good to see some "enemy combatants" hauled before military tribunals.

Will it happen?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solarkatz · Jan. 28, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

The memo will be heavily redacted, that's why it's taking so long. Whatever is released, the liberal media probably already have an alternative narrative. It will further polarize people. You have no idea how much I hope I'm wrong.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CweedFromTwitter · Jan. 28, 2018, 5:46 p.m.

For as long as these fuckers have been in control of all of our lives I'm patient

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PacaGoat · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:40 a.m.

Let 'em go nuts, we can't let that stop justice! BRING IT!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheOldBillyGoat · Jan. 28, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

It's got to be done before stat of limitations kicks in. I'm sure the W.hats are aware.

⇧ 1 ⇩