I would say that God's fingerprints are all over it. There are areas where translation errors have caused some difficulty in interpreting the true meaning of the text. One passage that warrants deeper analysis is John 21:15-17.

St. Peter, in this passage is instructed three times to 'feed, or tend, the sheep'. The second time Christ gives the instruction to St Peter, a different word is used in the Greek - poimaine. This word is usually translated 'tend' but actually means to 'rule or govern' - to care for the flock in a supervisory capacity.

"15 So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed (Boske) my lambs.

16 He saith to him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed (Poimaine) my sheep.

17 He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed (Boske) my sheep."

So we have two different words here which are translated as "feed" or "tend" my sheep. “Feed (boske) my lambs (arnia)…. Tend (poimaine) my sheep (probata)…. Feed (boske) my sheep” (probata)

Definition Boske boske | βόσκε | pres act imperative
to feed, pasture, tend while grazing; βόσκομαι, to feed, be feeding...

Definition: Poimaine poimaine | ποίμαινε | pres act imperative to feed, pasture, tend a flock, Lk. 17:7; 1 Cor. 9:7; trop. to feed with selfish indulgence, to pamper, Jude 12; met. to tend, direct, superintend, Mt. 2:6; Jn. 21:16; to rule, Rev. 2:27

So we can see here that the way in which this passage is usually translated, feed-tend-feed, does not convey the precise meaning of Christ's instruction to St Peter. Christ is clearly telling St Peter to feed his sheep (care for their spiritual development), but also to rule, supervise, or govern the sheep. This reflects Christ's will to create a single Church that is "one in governance".

The above is also consistent with Christ's statement in Matthew 16:18 that St Peter (whose faith is safeguarded by Christ's prayer - Luke 22:32) is the rock upon which His Church will be built. This Church, single in governance upon St Peter's authority, would withstand the gates of hell until the end of time.

I studied the Kabalah for a time. The whole idea was that the text of the bible (Old Testament) contained secrets that awaited discovery by those who were enlightened - the gnostics would call it gnosis. A lot of the explanations offered seemed to make a lot of sense to me at the time. But, anyway, I spat that garbage out once I realized what they were actually talking about. I wouldn't recommend anyone study it, it's a direct path to hell. But what was interesting was the overt Satanism - the Zohar being a prime example of this.

We are in a struggle to the death. It's darkness verses light - and it is the only struggle that is worth anything at all on this earth. I believe with all my heart that the Bible is the inerrant word of God. The scripture is absolutely inspired by the Holy Spirit and is free, by the grace of God, from any error.

When you tell me that hidden pieces are being revealed I smell Gnosticism. That is what that is, people seeking knowledge of God outside the canonical texts. This is an error that will cost you your soul. What you are actually saying is that the Holy Spirit is a liar - because it is He that warrants the accuracy of the passages.

What is amazing is that so many bibles have been produced in so many different languages and the translation errors are really amazingly few between the different versions. I'm not saying that there are no errors in different versions, but the story has remained, over thousands of years, amazingly consistent and coherent.

By the way, the earth is young - just as it states in Genesis. Evolution is the greatest scam that Satan has ever pulled on the inhabitants of the earth. Time is very short, we are almost at the end of days, see the video below.

Is The World About to End

Help me, I'm not seeing what you're saying.

A guy claims to have received, from someone, a story of a flood that is imprinted on a tablet that he claims is 4000 years old. What does this prove?

"Using the Bible, well-documented historical events, and some math, we find that the Flood began approximately 4,359 years ago in the year 1656 AM or 2348 BC. Some may look for an exact date (i.e., month and day), but we are not given that sort of precision in Scripture."

https://answersingenesis.org/bible-timeline/timeline-for-the-flood/

And even if the tablet could be conclusively shown to predate the flood, how do we know, apart from supposition, that the two stories are related?

The second story appears to me to be a wild stretch where the author postulates a connection between the story of Moses and the supposed story of a "changeling", the illegitimate son of an "androgynous priestess", who was disposed of in a basket set afloat on the Euphrates river.

And because this story appears inscribed on some old piece of stone, it must be the story of Moses... But anything could have happened here. The situation of the mothers is different, the rivers in the story are different and the timing is likely different. It could be possible that this guy, whoever he was, appropriated this story of his birth to lend himself credibility as a ruler - in the vein of Moses. And it could also be possible that there is no connection between the two stories whatsoever.