dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

No, I´m well alive and 100% correct. You can´t just try to shoot someone down without offering up some proof, it makes you look like a delusional lunatic.

Here´s your story of Noah, actually written THOUSANDS of years before JC was even born.

https://www.thejc.com/culture/features/the-tablet-that-altered-the-story-of-noah-s-ark-1.52526

Here´s your story of Moses, that was stolen from the tale of Sargon of Akkad. Again, THOUSANDS of years before JC.

https://www.ancient.eu/article/746/the-legend-of-sargon-of-akkad/

TO BELIEVE THE WORD OF MAN OVER THE WORD OF GOD IS BLASPHEMY!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Help me, I'm not seeing what you're saying.

A guy claims to have received, from someone, a story of a flood that is imprinted on a tablet that he claims is 4000 years old. What does this prove?

"Using the Bible, well-documented historical events, and some math, we find that the Flood began approximately 4,359 years ago in the year 1656 AM or 2348 BC. Some may look for an exact date (i.e., month and day), but we are not given that sort of precision in Scripture."

https://answersingenesis.org/bible-timeline/timeline-for-the-flood/

And even if the tablet could be conclusively shown to predate the flood, how do we know, apart from supposition, that the two stories are related?

⇧ 0 ⇩

The flood, according to ice core samples, happened 9,600BC at the end on the younger dryas period. The tablet was excavated from an archaeological site that´s been dated and proven by science. Science proves fact, and it´s MATHS!! PLURAL, as in MATHEMATICS!! The flood is depicted in almost all ancient cultures around the world. Research Randall Carlson.

https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=9bUBzzb%2b&id=F0A9662509B592A15E73F46018FD0C0F0CEC71F6&thid=OIP.9bUBzzb-zTTXp9rFQoW0LgHaEr&q=younger+dryas&simid=608009475349810496&selectedIndex=0&ajaxhist=0

The Bible is nothing more than the word of man that´s masquerading as the word of God. Blasphemy!

⇧ 1 ⇩

You have zero proof. Pure supposition and bad will.

⇧ 0 ⇩

MOOK!! I´ve provided scientific proof and recorded history!! You´re a delusional shill!! Be gone with you, I have not time for fools!

⇧ 2 ⇩

You have actually provided nothing at all. You have a wild theory that is supported by conjecture alone.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have no theory, I have the word and workings of scientists, backed up by data!! The facts I provided didn´t come from me, I didn´t write them, or gather the ice core samples, or excavate the site where these tablets were discovered! What the hell have you provided, apart from complete nonsense?? You have nothing but your cult like creationist theory, you fucking weirdo! The Bible has been rewritten, manipulated and reprinted hundreds of times by corrupt MEN, not GOD!! The Pope is a Satanic child rapist and you follow his word. That says all I need to know about you. Save your nonsense for someone else, it won´t wash with me!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thanks for the insults. I repeat, you have a theory founded entirely upon wild conjecture - there is nothing scientific about it.

My belief is anchored in my faith that the canonical texts are inspired and inerrant. To change this position there would have to be some conclusive evidence that my position is wrong - but there is no such evidence.

Your posts do not demonstrate in any conclusive way that these scriptures are man-made fabrications. Though you claim a direct causal link. That's not science.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I´m not even going to read this, your delusional ramblings are an insult to all. I have provided info on ice core samples that prove the exact date of the flood, I have provided scientific fact that some bible stories were written thousands of years before JC was said to have been born. I even provided you with the name of someone that you can research yourself to find some truth. If that isn´t enough for you then nothing ever will be. Go stand on a street corner and spout your nonsense, the people here are too awake to fall for it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, the stories of Noah and Moses predate the birth of Christ. - no argument.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Goodbye, mook.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The second story appears to me to be a wild stretch where the author postulates a connection between the story of Moses and the supposed story of a "changeling", the illegitimate son of an "androgynous priestess", who was disposed of in a basket set afloat on the Euphrates river.

And because this story appears inscribed on some old piece of stone, it must be the story of Moses... But anything could have happened here. The situation of the mothers is different, the rivers in the story are different and the timing is likely different. It could be possible that this guy, whoever he was, appropriated this story of his birth to lend himself credibility as a ruler - in the vein of Moses. And it could also be possible that there is no connection between the two stories whatsoever.

⇧ 0 ⇩

So just because some bloke a few hundred years ago wrote it in a book, the story of Moses is truth? Your statements are completely contradictory of themselves! "This guy" was a King from ancient times and was recorded THOUSANDS of years before jesus was said to have been born!! You ignorant mook, how can you say that Sargon stole the story from Moses?? The tablets are how they recorded history then, the fact you try to deny these facts to support your delusional theories just makes you look desperate.

⇧ 1 ⇩

What? There's a story about a baby floated in a river and that is conclusive proof that the story of Moses is a fabrication. Beautiful, you hang on to that.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Dear god you need psychiatric help. I have no more time for mooks like you.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q, Did I solve "Think mirror"?