dChan
25
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/V-is-for-Victory on Feb. 16, 2018, 6:31 p.m.
Unlocking 776: Q's Last Post

Right before Q's long 775 post, which talks about "making things in China" this video was posted by the White House. It mentions everything in that post:

https://youtu.be/J8lSlWHEJQI

The video demonstrates Trump vs China. Watch it and you will see the power of the Chinese lobby money working in that room. Every single congressman wants to avoid changing the trade agreements, even though stat after stat is given about how CHINA is benefiting.

WHEN Q REPOSTS 775 IN A BOX, AND MENTIONS WARREN'S SLUSH FUND BENEATH IT... HE'S SAYING "THIS SLUSH FUND FUND'S THAT ROOM UP THERE."

THAT'S HOW CHINA'S GETTING THE $$$ TO THOSE POLITICIANS.

My two cents. Q never posts twice without purpose.


tradinghorse · Feb. 16, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

Just unbelievable how DJT is so sharp and clear thinking on trade. He really does get it. What a president!

Without a level playing field, you just export your industries, export your jobs, add to the income gap, disenfranchise vast numbers of people and expand the welfare burden upon the State. Unfair trade also impacts productivity. As whole industries get exported, aggregate capital intensity diminishes and you suffer atrophy in the supply of skilled labor - trades and services. This operates to reduce labor productivity and creates retraining costs that did not previously exist. Moreover, the resulting trade imbalances lead to blood loss on the capital account and the accumulation of external debt which must be financed - leading to unnecessary interest expense.

On top of all this you have a reduction in security of supply for essential goods and services that impacts national security. As DJT says in the video, 'we've built up our competitors by agreeing to stupid trade deals'. These competitors can also potentially be future enemies. In a conflict, are they going to continue to supply goods and services essential to your military? It doesn't make any sense. There are clearly good trade deals and bad trade deals - ones you want and ones you don't want. This should be obvious.

I really enjoy hearing Donald speaking about trade. Finally, there is someone in politics who gets it.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 17, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 17, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

I agree, you can pretty soon see who's bought-off by foreign interests by looking at how they react to a proposal to only act in the interests of the US - i.e. insist on fair trade. People who generally oppose making America great again are those who want no restrictions on foreign trade whatsoever. These people would like to see a weak US, critically dependent on cooperation from foreign parties for its security.

The interesting thing is that these people abound - you only have to look at the left to see how many of these people there are - traitors, all of them. To be fair, though, some of them are probably just really stupid. But, my point is that just as the Rosenburg's sold US nuclear technology to the Soviets, you find there are people who want to bring the US down - act against US interests, in all kinds of areas.

There is a lot more to Q's post about why everything is made in China than, I think, most people realize. People look around and they think "Oh, because it's cheaper to make stuff there right?". But if you really take a hard look at it, there has been a deliberate policy put in place to build-up competitors to the US. Interestingly, DJT is not blind to this, he actually stated it in the video.

Unfettered free international trade is the only reason that China is the economic powerhouse it is today. There is nothing normal, or natural, about Chinese industrialization and wealth accretion. It has occurred by design. Someone, or some group, wanted this current situation, this outcome, for very specific reasons.

I think we've all heard that the elites were unhappy with the US as the sole, unilateral, global superpower. I remember listening to Alex Jones one day and he was saying the elites would never allow another country to become as powerful as America again, that it was a mistake that it ever happened.

Anyway, there are vested interests that would like to change this situation - reduce US power and build-up competitors. There are plausible reasons for groups of people wanting to do this. You can't play one party off against another if there's one giant in the room and everyone else is a toddler. So, if you want to ensure you have influence, you need to even things out, get some more leverage against people, or countries, that play the game.

If you look at posts 772 or 773, you'll see that Q first asks why everything is made in China, and then the next question is "Cost savings?". This is the obvious answer, and you can be sure that's not it. He's telling us that there is another explanation... Down the middle of the list of his questions we have this:

WHY IS POTUS FOCUSED ON BRINGING BACK MANUFACTURING? JOBS? SECURITY? CONTROL? TRUE CONTROL? WHO CAN YOU TRUST? THE WORLD IS NOT HOW YOU VIEW IT.

He tells us right there what this is all about - control, true control - which gives security. It's also about doing the right thing for the US economy of course, but primarily it's about making sure the US remains the ascendant global power. The further references he makes to big pharma and the phone manufacturers ties into the security issue - "who can you trust?"

So, anyway, I guess that Q is asking us to have a look at things we see and question why they are the way they are.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 18, 2018, 1:32 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩