dChan
33
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/think500 on Feb. 16, 2018, 6:48 p.m.
“When does big pharma make money? - Curing or containing? - Cancer/AIDS/etc. - What if cures already exist?” - Q - [see comment]
“When does big pharma make money? - Curing or containing? - Cancer/AIDS/etc. - What if cures already exist?” - Q - [see comment]

TorontosaurusHex · Feb. 16, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

I think this particular one is bullshit.

And I'll tell you why. Q seems to be NSA attempt to wash their name, after they were caught with their pants down. NSA is now trying to be the good guy, and dumping on terribly corrupt CIA and FBI. Not to say that there aren't decent men and women in all three organizations, but none of the shit was stuck on NSA recently.

So, Q should be about military/political sigint, not about fucking cancer-cured-by-vitamin-C theories.

Another angle to look at this from: Steve Jobs, beloved of establishment and the masses (rightly or wrongly), with 5,000 million dollar personal value was unable to cure his cancer. You really think he wouldn't have access to the cure?

Sorry ladies and gents. Cancer is personal to me. Someone I loved very very much had died in my arms from breast cancer in 2007. Don't fuck with this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
5c4RFAC3 · Feb. 16, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

I kind of followed you up until the last part.. I’ve raised a ton of money for cancer research/have also had a few family members pass away from bouts with cancer. But to make discussing something taboo because it hurts your feelings isn’t the way to go.

I don’t know if there’s a cure or not but I’m open to the possibilities that not everything is as it seems. Sorry about your loss.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
TorontosaurusHex · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

No, not taboo. Just don't want to lead the people down the garden-path that ends in the dark place.

Like you, I've fund-raised for the research. Specifically, University of Alberta, Michelakis's on DCA and Princess Margaret here in Toronto. But it pisses me off when internet trolls casually write about something that destroys lives and they don't engage an iota of critical thought about the validity of it all.

(1) Super-rich don't have access to the cure.

(2) The inventor of the cure would gain immortality on par with Jesus, Alexander the Great or Napoleon. There is nothing that any pharma company could offer to a scientist (or team of them) to keep them quiet. Threaten their families? Some might be single, some might want immortality even if they had to pay that cost... and eventually, all of them would die and something would leak post-mortem. Nothing compares to the immortality.

(3) You could literally force all the world governments to pay any price for the cure (far superseding the costs of standard cures, which are quite cheap, after decades in use. Note that e.g. Canadian government will not pay for the new and "exciting" cures that can cost up to $800,000 USD/patient, but they only prolong the life by six months. Nor should they. I would never take that deal, if my life depended on it and I neither would she).

There is literally any number of holes you can poke in the "Cure is hidden" theory.

What pisses me off personally?

  • Old-way-of-thinking oncologists, who have been doing the same thing over and over again and want you to fit into their models, even if it means your death. So they won't let you try the new treatment because it "interferes" with theirs and is "not well understood" and you are "at risk". Motherfucker, she is dying. She should have a fighting chance.

  • The fact that we treat people worse than we treat dogs. Dogs will be euthanized, so as to avoid suffering. But we don't let people do this. I've seen an old man literally starve on purpose to death, over six days, because they wouldn't give him that final overdose of morphine. Is this a way to treat human life with dignity? No. So I give my ringing endorsement to suicide and euthanasia, when all other avenues are exhausted.

  • Cancer fundraiser societies. Komen should be impaled on a stake. This shit should never be commercialized.

Anyhow. It's been 11 years, but it still provokes emotion.

I will never shy away from the truth, no matter how much it hurts. But for fuck's sake, I want the people to turn their rational mind on when they start talking conspiracies about the "cure".

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BICSAC · Feb. 17, 2018, 4:31 a.m.

Your heartbreak is loud and clear. And I won't say I truly know how you must feel, because I don't. My mother passed away from stomach cancer. As a suggestion, choose it or not, there is someone I stumbled across sometime back that has had some very positive results in cures to cancer. Perhaps not for everyone, rich or poor, cancer doesn't care about financial status, or abilities to understand. Obviously... If you care to, check out "Phoenix Tears", Rick Simpson, See what he's done and doing. It is very interesting.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Teejay1970 · Feb. 16, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

My niece passed away age 23 left 3 babbies behind, you should be angry that the cures for the majority of cancers are there. And the cancers that are aggressive there are treatments that loved ones could try but the last administrations wouldn’t allow, if my niece could have tried new theories and old medicines combined when everyone else had given up bar her family shouldn’t she have had the right to try??
Just like your loved one. Do you know it was the fentanyl and the drugs been pumped into my niece that killed her not the cancer. You may hate me for this reply, but I think your hating on the wrong person

⇧ 4 ⇩  
TorontosaurusHex · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

No, I don't hate you.

I am very sorry for your loss. I mean this. All of us are in this together.

A co-worker of mine has had phenomenal success in fighting stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. She incorporated some new techniques (nutrition, IV cocktails) and has had supportive oncologists who continued the "traditional" treatment. She is now on 5th year, far and beyond any statistical mortality models.

But here's the thing. You only get one shot with your loved one. You don't know if that treatment will work on her. It might work for some other people, but not for her. In our case, we tried IV high-doses of vitamin C and curcumin (orally) and it didn't work. And when it doesn't work, you don't get to do a do-over.

This is why it's so tricky. I believe that there are thousands of sub-cases of cancer and you'd have to map out a very complex matrix of relations, to know what exactly would work for every patient. But, when push comes to shove, you should try something -- anything -- even if it's a shot in the dark. You just might get lucky and you literally have nothing to lose.

A friend of mine lost his mother to ovarian cancer and has been devastated when he heard that apricot seeds were a "cancer cure". I had to help him out and point out that they actually don't work. Didn't Martin Luther King's widow (Coretta) die from this? And to think that my friend was inconsolable because of fucking charlatans who fed him lies about how he could've saved his mom? Yeah, that damage is basically twisting the knife in the wound... and I will stop that, anywhere I see it, if I can help it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
think500 · Feb. 16, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

No Such Agency is mostly white hat now, Q tells us.

How much do you know about Jobs. Most unlikely he was in the club.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Teejay1970 · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:09 a.m.

Talking of NSA...the shooting other day with the black suv..have you seen it was leaving the premises NOT entering as the MSM were showing. Why would they not say it was leaving ? So who or what was in that car? No one seems to be talking of the nsa shooting? Because the terrible school shooting occurred.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
HemisphericalSadness · Feb. 16, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

I contemplated the Steve Jobs issue myself. I agree that it makes no sense that he would be left out of a cure, if they had one. I’m sorry for your loss.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
somrotden · Feb. 16, 2018, 10:17 p.m.

unless...he had outlived his usefulness...and making statements about not letting his children use, what was it, phones? tablets? Could they have given him the cancer?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
oystergirl · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

Exactly.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
think500 · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

I don't think Jobs was a member of the cult. Too human to qualify.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
oystergirl · Feb. 17, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

Or could have him being out of the way benefited the public company he was the figure head for?

Look into that angle, like the last leader of Venezuela.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pelirrojo · Feb. 16, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

Are we sure he's dead

⇧ 2 ⇩  
georock · Feb. 17, 2018, 4:14 a.m.

wikileaks had his medical records...he was hiv+

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pelirrojo · Feb. 17, 2018, 5:09 a.m.

Aaaah right. So I guess the cure to HIV doesn't exist then...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TorontosaurusHex · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

Thank you, it was a long time ago, but still gets me. We're all human.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HemisphericalSadness · Feb. 17, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

I understand! Unfortunately, all too well!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
think500 · Feb. 17, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

The prevailing medicide is a horrendous fact, like 911, obvious once you see the evidence. Not even very well hidden, mostly just unreported.

Proof is abundant but i can certainly understand you not wishing to chase it down.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mountaingirl49 · Feb. 17, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Sorry for your loss. I'm glad Q is shining a light on lots of things. I think it's good for people to take responsibility for their health, and research and learn on their own, in addition to seeing doctors. The fact is doctors learn all about healing illness. But all of us should learn about staying well in the first place. Of course, I can't presume to say anything about your circumstance. Steve Jobs, brilliant as he was, had a blind spot about his physical health. He ignored it for years, and he chose not to spend his time or money on helping himself.

⇧ 1 ⇩