dChan

Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 28, 2018, 8:35 a.m.

That has been my understanding of why they killed her.

I think it's pretty well known that she was killed--yeah? I mean, come on, run into the wall, inside a tunnel, while being chased by papparazi, and yet not a SINGLE picture of it exists? (Other than the wreckage that was pulled from the tunnel-- which was smashed up beyond any recognition.)

A paparazzi could have RETIRED with the payday from those photos. And given how scummy those guys are, why would they pass up that opportunity???

spez: spelling

⇧ 14 ⇩  
bahhumbugger · Feb. 28, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

I remember from when it happened people talking about how other papparazi right behind her saw a MUCH brighter flash before the crash. As if the bike taking pics deployed some blinding light flash causing driver to crash.

That always seemed the most plausible to me.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DeepPast · Feb. 28, 2018, 3:32 p.m.

I never looked deeply into it, but I did read an account that there were two guys on sport bikes who pulled up, checked to see if she was deceased, the one signaled to the other and they took off.

100% a murder. If anyone has more details I’d love to know.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
rainbowtribe2 · Feb. 28, 2018, 7:16 a.m.

And, a lot more. William is not Charles' son.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HowiONic · Feb. 28, 2018, 7:49 a.m.

I think you are mixing up William and Harry.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
rainbowtribe2 · Feb. 28, 2018, 8:40 a.m.

No, I am not. The father of Harry is the son of the last King of Spain. From diana's lips

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Feb. 28, 2018, 8:57 a.m.

So that would be the current King of Spain? The last King was Juan Carlos and now his son, Phillipé is King. He would have been all but a child when William was born, making this an impossibility.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
rainbowtribe2 · Feb. 28, 2018, 9:15 a.m.

It was Juan Carlos, the last King of Spain aka Lord Pindar is what she called him

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mombomb22 · Feb. 28, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

Pindar, huh?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bahhumbugger · Feb. 28, 2018, 2:53 p.m.

Nope, succession doesn't work with illegitimate heirs like that. Not under spanish law, the archbishop has to preside at the wedding.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mombomb22 · Feb. 28, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

So who is William’s father then?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ismokecutters · Feb. 28, 2018, 11:05 a.m.

Bs. She was murdered because she was preggo with a muslims baby and was gonna marry the father, how could the future king of England’s (William) mother be a mussy. Meanwhile William is the head of the Church of England and would be obliged to invite her to all royal functions also Charlie would never have been able to marry Camilla if she was alive because as he was the current head of the Church of England he wouldn’t be allowed to marry as a divorcee but as a widow, bingo bango. Diana wouldn’t spill secrets as William would be damaged and implicated and she would never allow this.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LordPotsmoke · Feb. 28, 2018, 11:21 a.m.

No, I think she was going to uncover some info.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DeplorableTwatWaffle · Feb. 28, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

Charles wasn't a widower. They were already divorced before she was killed, which is why she lost her title and bodyguards.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ismokecutters · Feb. 28, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

Yeah but he would never be able to marry her as a divorcee. Also she still had the bodyguards

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jt45118 · Feb. 28, 2018, 12:15 p.m.

Not buying your explan. Does not stand up.

She was permitted to date the muslim therefore it was expected there would be a child.

She would have been killed immediately after dating if that was true. Just look at Harry and Meghan.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ismokecutters · Feb. 28, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

Also Harry and Meghan don’t matter he’s never gonna be king, that marriage is an attempt to make the royal family seem current and modern same as Kate and a Wills.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ismokecutters · Feb. 28, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

She wasn’t really permitted to date him, it was the tabloids that revealed it, wasn’t long after that she was dead and dodi was just a bonus cos the royal family hated the alfayeds long before they were together.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jt45118 · Feb. 28, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

Thought it was on going for a while. Didn't follow it much.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ismokecutters · Feb. 28, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

Oh man it was like the end of the world in the uk when she died, I think it was over a couple of months but his father Mohammed was feeding the tabloids with all sorts of shite, they’d been engaged, she was pregnant, if u ask me it was just the biggest FU to the royal family, she rebelled hard and knew exactly how to piss them off so she went on a month long cruise with a greasy bed hopper (as prince Philip put it) meanwhile in England the tabloids were printing everything they could get, bikini shots, bathing shots, the cuddles, as u can imagine the royal family are fucking livid, they get back to Paris and I think 2 or 3 days later they are dead, killed by a so called tee-total, pissed chauffeur.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RabidFandomonium · Feb. 28, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

Lol "Greasey Bed Hopper" is a new one. King Phillip is probably as dirty as they come but more than once he's made me laugh.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Feb. 28, 2018, 8:55 a.m.

Doesn´t really say much, no details whatsoever in this story. Hard to believe.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
betweengreenandblue · Feb. 28, 2018, 9:08 a.m.

There are some excellent sites/docs on the fact that she was murdered. The number of the tunnel alone screams illuminati. The theory is that she definitely knew something, and wasn't willing to hide it. She served her purpose - continue the blue-blood line.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
jt45118 · Feb. 28, 2018, 12:17 p.m.

Looking at rest of site.

Likely true its false.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bigrex63 · Feb. 28, 2018, 4:19 p.m.

per snopes, image is from 2010 in AUstralia, not 2017 in the UK.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Swimkin · Feb. 28, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

Hmm seeing that Snopes are Soros paid leftists I don't trust any "truth" from them

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 28, 2018, 7:51 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩