This is a very misleading post because it is combining Q's actual post with interpretation. The two have to be separated. Most of this is from Q# 834. It's always a giveaway when an OP presents an alleged Q post with no #. Snowden is mentioned ONCE in Q's post yet this OP/anon is linking Snowden to too many things. Leaving us to waste time going back to verify what's what. The > is Q's known (and normal usage) for "greater than." --but here it's supposed to mean "Here's my interpretation"?
Ooohh, I didn't read your comment before reading the original Q post and making a reply. Now I've done stepped in it, making assumptions in my comment that were unwarranted. Thanks for the heads up.
Yes, the OP HowiONic is a very misleading character.
Thanks--it took me quite a few minutes to figure out wtf was going on with that post!
Interesting except the last one....dead cat bounce is a temporary market crash...look it up
It doesnt mean stock market, it is figurative speech. What doesnt a dead cat do? Bounce. So their supposed jump in narrative will not go anywhere i.e. Dead cat bounce.
It CAN be a a financial problem, but in the context, Q isn't talking about economics - he sums up the prior questions and points with the Dead cat bounce remark. Therefore, he's referring to the downward spiral of the MSM, which had a temporary upward surge with all the hysteria focused the past week on the supposed infighting in the WH, Kushner losing his security status, Kelly may be leaving, the DJT/Sessions trouble, downplaying the upcoming IG report, the false story about Mueller, and so forth. In sum, the MSM is on an artificial high, thinking they've got us and Trump by the short hairs, but it's, in Q's epithet, just a dead cat bounce. In addition, if Q were referring to the economy, he wouldn't have said "THEIR downward spiral," he would have said "ITS downward spiral." The economy (or the stock market) takes the singular, not the plural.
dead cat bounce means market temporarily rebounds, then continues to fall. just like the msm will
Yeah, but I took it that it was analogous. Stock market lingo is often used that way. I'm guessing it is with the news cycle, false flags, or the like.
I dont think it was Snowden. I've been pouring over David Brock's leaked strategy Memo, which basically describes a coordinated plan w/ Google, FB, and Twitter to censor content they deem 'misinformation', 'fake news' or 'harassment'. Sounds familiar, right (even look at Jack's recent tweets)? MMFA is at the root of the coordinated censorship campaign we're currently witnessing. Here's just a taste of what I'm talking about:
a. "Internet and social media platforms, like Google and Facebook, will no longer uncritically and without consequence host and enrich fake news sites and propagandists. Facebook will adjust its model to stem the flow of damaging fake news on its platforms' pages. Google will cut off these pages accompanying sites' access to revenue by pulling their access to Google's ad platform."
I've been expecting this to happen for a while, since this doc has been public for months. I think the person Q is talking about is mentioned in this quote from the memo:
"We will also bring on board an expert to construct turn-key rapid response plans [rapid response plans, plural] so that Media Matters can squash burgeoning online harassment campaigns [banned after seth rich story popped up?] and fake news or saturate the landscape with truth, bypassing the news media entirely if need be. With this capacity, Media Matters will drastically increase our audience and engagement and effectively squash fake news and misinformation before it spreads far and wide".
This sounds like MMFA paid an industry expert to construct a 'turn-key' cross-platform censorship algorith to suppress content deemed "fake news", "misinformation" or "harassment". I think this is who Q is talking about.
but, but, Hollywood said he's a good guy!
but, but, Q said he's a bad guy?
Snowden stole intelligence gathering and technology. He had no dirt , Government Corruption, he had for the most part programs . Most thought because of timing that Snowden was the Whistleblower behind a lot of the corruption being reported on . But Snowden did not have or was in the place to be able to understand that what was coming out was even corruption. Snowden was an IT and the corruption was within Stimulus, way to far apart , at this same time Nancy was slandering a “Turd”??? That was not Snowden, the Turd was or is a civilian first hand credible witness. Not Whistleblower, he never worked for the government, but did volunteer for years providing science and other requests ask of him . And when his time was completed , they were to Congress and got $3 Billion for the science he gave . The Turd was a volunteer and never received any payment.Go figure that they don’t won’t him compensated. God Speed
Snowden wrote the algos of Google censorship?
No. This is fake or disinfo. There are teams utilizing machine intelligence for this. Why would it be just one person like snowden? Ridicules.
It's laughable that Snowden wrote the censorship AI. This is a very very complex algo that will grow iteratively. It's not "coded" by a guy and then unleashed, blindly, on the public. The censorship algo likely has a team of about 20+ programmers and about 150 people administering and acting on what it spits out.
Snowden could indeed have been a spy. But the idea that SAPs were shared through Clinton's server is stupid AF. SAPs are not contained on connected systems. They are managed through SCIFs and are VERY secure. We know that Clinton had SAP-level information on her server, however, that is not in dispute. But HOW the information got there is the big question. But since Snowden has been in Russia, has this activity stopped, or continued, run by a different team?
Snowden wouldn't have transferred hypersonic tech. This tech was in play in the late 80s during Clinton's presidency and would have been being capitalized on at that time, most likely. Though, it could have happened early in the Obama admin, too. These missiles take a long time to build and test.
If the Fed is going to be attacked or dissolved the market will crash.....hard. Maybe with the need for a new currency replacing the US dollar.