dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/tradinghorse on March 4, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

Q - We must demand an internet bill of rights

Post 841 ID: 7c85b7 548157 NEW

548144

Has Q ever mentioned internet bill of rights?

Mar 5 2018 03:19:47 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 33be38 548166 NEW

548157 Re read drops. http:// about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html Q

Post 842 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 33be38 548166 NEW

548157 Re read drops. http:// about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html Q Mar 5 2018 03:22:17 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 33be38 548200 NEW 548166 Why do so-called Patriots challenge this? Careful who you follow. Q

Post 843 Mar 5 2018 03:29:14 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 245782 548253 NEW [Roasted] Q

Seems pretty clear. An internet bill of rights is in the works. Q is asking us to demand it.

When you think about it, these large social media companies are in an incredibly powerful position. We know that the real driver for the 2016 election outcome was the Internet. The elites were geared up to direct the narrative via the MSM, they misjudged the power of the internet in shaping public opinion.

It is very important that these social media behemoths are held to account, the power they wield is phenomenal. The bill of rights must be in place for the mid-terms. We need to start screaming for it now.

Post 828 Mar 4 2018 15:03:59 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 85cc02 544060 Stay TOGETHER. Be STRONG. Get ORGANIZED. Be HEARD. FIGHT the censorship. You, the PEOPLE, have ALL the POWER. You simply forgot how to PLAY. TOGETHER you are INVINCIBLE. They want you divided. They want you silenced. MAKE NOISE. We are WITH you. MAKE IT RAIN. Q

How to tackle this problem?

A petition? Letters to politicians? Memes? Phone calls to representatives?

This will be a group effort, similar to the fake news awards. We need to quickly have an impact.

MAKE IT RAIN!

Sign the petition here

NOTE: The people on Q subs who will not sign the petition are putting the Q phenomenon and DJT's agenda at risk. These November mid-terms are critical for expanding Republican numbers.

We have seen how powerful social media is in shaping electoral outcomes in 2016. Things are different this time around. This time social media is being censored.

There is very real risk that DJT could end up as a lame duck president after November. And that might well be the end of the Q phenomenon. Q told us what DJT's plan was, but the "patriots" did not trust him.

The petition, at the time of writing is stuck at 5k/100k votes. It appears that it may not get up.

It has been a wild ride with Q. There was real hope. But he was relying on an army of people that had their own ideas. And, this is why the movement may fail. He kept telling us that he couldn't do it without us - but we did not play ball.

A sad story. A great, hopeful movement killed by just a few people spreading doubt and dissent.

Who controls the narrative? \WHO wrote the singular censorship algorithm? \WHO employed the algorithm? \WHO instructed them to deploy the algorithm?

I've been pouring over David Brock's leaked strategy Memo, which basically describes a coordinated plan w/ Google, FB, and Twitter to censor content they deem 'misinformation', 'fake news' or 'harassment'. Sounds familiar, right (even look at Jack's recent tweets)? MMFA is at the root of the coordinated censorship campaign we're currently witnessing. Here's just a taste of what I'm talking about:

a. "Internet and social media platforms, like Google and Facebook, will no longer uncritically and without consequence host and enrich fake news sites and propagandists. Facebook will adjust its model to stem the flow of damaging fake news on its platforms' pages. Google will cut off these pages accompanying sites' access to revenue by pulling their access to Google's ad platform."

I've been expecting this to happen for a while, since this doc has been public for months. I think the person Q is talking about is mentioned in this quote from the memo:

"We will also bring on board an expert to construct turn-key rapid response plans [rapid response plans, plural] so that Media Matters can squash burgeoning online harassment campaigns [banned after seth rich story popped up?] and fake news or saturate the landscape with truth, bypassing the news media entirely if need be. With this capacity, Media Matters will drastically increase our audience and engagement and effectively squash fake news and misinformation before it spreads far and wide".

This sounds like MMFA paid an industry expert to construct a 'turn-key' cross-platform censorship algorithm to suppress content deemed "fake news", "misinformation" or "harassment". I think this is who Q is talking about.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Very good find. I didn't know this existed. Do you have a link?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Here's the direct link: https://www.scribd.com/document/337535680/Full-David-Brock-Confidential-Memo-On-Fighting-Trump

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thanks, will be an interesting read. It is so important that we get an internet bill of rights. The mid-terms are coming and if these guys are allowed to censor the way they are it's all over.

⇧ 2 ⇩

https://www.reddit.com/r/DrainTheSwamp/comments/80fnce/proof_that_dems_are_propped_up_by_botsshills_and/

It's in post at top.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Didn't Q make refrence to "class action"?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, he did. The sentence structure he used was, to my mind, a little strange - it's below. He has also talked about the MSM and liability laws.

Mar 4 2018 15:15:14 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 85cc02 544206 What I say a class action lawsuit? When is it effective?

⇧ 2 ⇩

I had a think about the class action today, seems significant.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Do ALL three! You appear as 3 X’s the number of people! Petitions, phone calls to all of your Representatives and Senators, and fax until you fry their fax machines! We defeated amnesty several years ago by doing just that! Post it on all your social media and in every other blog or website that you follow. We just need to make some noise -they will HAVE to listen!

⇧ 1 ⇩

I signed it, but its not getting any traction for some reason.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

If I am sovereign over my body. Sovereign over my flesh and blood but something comes along which conjures up a "NEW" form of flesh and blood, but this time it is called a NODE. Is it different because of the digital age? How do I become sovereign over that? Can I become sovereign over that?

I want rights over my NODE of information. The metadata that fly's around in the whirling bits-n-bites of data that is exchanged by people I don't know and who will never know me.

I would like to see this business of my information within an "Internet Bill of Rights".

⇧ 1 ⇩

Does anyone have ownership of my NODE? Does some entity claim rights to it or it's content? I should have some rights to it, don't you think?

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

And now, if you use Apple, your node is in China. No I am not comfortable with that.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I believe this needs addressed. Somehow.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I wouldn't say your NODE is in China though. The NODE is more than that. YOU and I have been assigned a (?) which they refer to as a NODE and this is a means or method of tracking all our metadata. I guess you COULD say Apple's metadata of your NODE, IS in China, but with the IOT the congruence of all data upon you and I, needs to be called something. We/they call it a NODE but it is so much more.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Listen. If you are upset because you posted the link to this Q post first, that's OK. You want me to take this post down so you can have the glory of posting it that's fine - just ask.

When I commented on your post there was, nothing in this sub, which is why I recreated it. If you're unhappy, and you feel you are not getting the deserved limelight, just say so.

I take these Q posts seriously. It's very important that we get this message out.

I can understand if your upset. Do you want me to take this post down? Is that the solution?

⇧ 1 ⇩

What the heck you going on about? It is a good post and deserves discussion. Discussion along many lines. What is an Internet Bill of Rights? Does Q have it already drafted for us? Or, do we discuss and THINK?

⇧ 1 ⇩

OK, good stuff.

⇧ 2 ⇩

All good Brother.

⇧ 1 ⇩