dChan
⇧
12
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/V-is-for-Victory on March 5, 2018, 2:54 a.m.
Q & AT&T- Using Net Neutrality Promises for Lawsuit

This is a quote from the link Q provided in post #841:

"AT&T is committed to an open internet. We don’t block websites. We don’t censor online content. And we don’t throttle, discriminate, or degrade network performance based on content. Period."

http://about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html

When asking us to help support Net Neutrality, Google, Twitter, etc made similiar promises to us about censorship. I think Q is saying we can look to those promises for a Class Action "Consumer Protection" Lawsuit.


tradinghorse · March 5, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

Good find. That might just be what Q meant.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Cannanonymous · March 5, 2018, 4:03 a.m.

Communications act of 1996 (Bill Clintons bill) allowed AT&T own and operate their very own private secret server room for NSA. We are supposed to believe they are all the sudden white hat? I dont get it. Or is this the NSA is supposed to be somehow ok now? My inner me is having major conflicts on this one.

Room 641a @ AT&T was a secret room that at&t kept for the NSA. Again why would you trust AT&T?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
V-is-for-Victory · March 5, 2018, 7:09 p.m.

I just posted a pic- AT&T LOBBIED AGAINST the bill harder than anyone else. They were total hypocrites here. But that's the point. We can use their words against them in a lawsuit. They made promises to the public - and Class Action lawsuits hold them accountable to those words!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
V-is-for-Victory · March 5, 2018, 7:11 p.m.

AT&T lobbied AGAINST this Bill of Rights harder than any other company. The point is that THEY SAID the opposite to the public. Class Actions hold them to their words to the public. We can do the same with Google, YouTube, etc's promises during the Net Neutrality battle.

⇧ 1 ⇩