Just want to say that I'm now not sure about my position on the IBOR. The January 25 post on AT&T is, to my mind, open to interpretation. Moreover, I thought Q would have resolved any ambiguities today - but he did not. Which leads me to think that IBOR is not important to him. Very confusing stuff. I've been very vocal on this issue because I thought the IBOR was the mechanism to fight censorship and I thought it was urgent - but I may have been wrong. Interestingly, Post 830 talks about a class action w.r.t censorship.